Labels Problems in popular cars

Labels problem is a common vehicle problem that happens to most car brands and models. The following is a sample list of Labels problems reported in most popular vehicles.

car   Labels problem of Chevrolet S10

The vehicle involved is a 2000 Chevrolet S10. The vehicle identification number (VIN) of this Chevrolet S10 is 1GCDT19W9Y_. Letter from to the administrator re product safety recall 00v258001 affecting 2000 Chevrolet vehicles with the incorrect payload capacity listed on the vehicle certification label on the driver's side door. The consumer stated the label read 3,872 lbs, when it should have read 1,434 lbs. Gm informed the consumer, they were not going to re-open the recall. Updated 03/02/12 the consumer also stated the heat stopped working in the vehicle. Updated 03/09/12 updated 04/20/12. The failure date was Mon., Jan. 2, 2012.

See all problems of Chevrolet S10 and all Labels problems of Chevrolet S10.

car   Labels problem of Chevrolet Tahoe

The vehicle involved was a 2002 Chevrolet Tahoe. Recently I noted a grinding noise in the rear end of my Tahoe. A repair shop showed me the "back plates" on the rear wheels. They were completely corroded to the point that pieces were falling off the plates. I was informed that this would not affect my braking but could lead to the inability to use my emergency brake. The manager said he had never seen anything this bad. A technician nearby spoke up and siad he saw a set on a chevy truck recently. I am submitting this material for only one purpose. I suspect there may be use of substandard, faulty material that is not resistant to corrosion being used in at least the Chevrolet line of trucks. This could result in failirue of the emergency brake and potential loss of life. I intend to get mine repaired but how many could be out there undiagnosed?. It was Dec. 2, 2004 when this labels issue occurred.

See all problems of Chevrolet Tahoe and all Labels problems of Chevrolet Tahoe.

car   Labels problem of Dodge Ram 2500

The car involved is a 2001 Dodge Ram 2500. The vehicle's vehicle identification number (VIN) was 1B7KC23691_. I bought this truck new on 6/01/01. On 6/26/01 returned to dealership for a recall and at that time I informed the dealer of the missing "vehicle certification label". Dealer stated "he would have to contact district manager to see about this item. I have contacted this dealer 3 more time over the past year about this item and each time have been told, "we are working on it". Dealer seems unable to aquire this required label from Dodge.

See all problems of Dodge Ram 2500 and all Labels problems of Dodge Ram 2500.

car   Labels problem of Dodge Ram 1500

The vehicle having this issue was a 2004 Dodge 1500. The right front wheel assembly broke free from vehicle while driving at 40mph nice straight road st 933 going from notre dame to niles michigan. The assembly rotor calipers lug nuts suspension and rim with tire. As the assembly rolled under the truck is caused me to go airborne this happened at 1:30pm on a beautiful day. 08/25/09. After the truck came to a stop I got out and could not believe what just happen. It was just a matter of minutes before the state police arrived. His first question was am I ok do I need medical attention. His second q uestion where is the other vehicle I told him there is none. Question 2 where is the rest of the truck. I said I do not know. My insurance is bent on getting the truck auction off trying to recoup some of there money. I got on your homepage and found a recall notice campaign id number 04v221000 affecting 6183 vehicles. The truck sits at copart salvage case exp. 0001961. I also called the manufacture they said it must have gotten lost in the mail. Thew recall was in 2004 two months after purchase of the truck they offered no help. What is there was some traffic that day there would have been many deaths including myself. The failure date was 08/25/09.

See all problems of Dodge Ram 1500 and all Labels problems of Dodge Ram 1500.

car   Labels problem of Ford Windstar

The car is a 2000 Ford Windstar. The VIN of this vehicle is 2FMZA5244Y_. Vehicle was sold without certification label. Dealer notifed. The dealer wants the owner of the vehicle to pick up replacement but the owner indicates to prefer the mailing of the sticker since the dealer is half hour drive away. This issue happened on September 11, 2000.

See all problems of Ford Windstar and all Labels problems of Ford Windstar.

car   Labels problem of Ford Windstar

The car was a 1998 Ford Windstar. Although not apparent on new labels, the composition is plastic covering over printed base, with the base having the necessary adhessive to affix to the master cylinder reservoir. While using a clean, dry cloth to clean up around the engine compartment, I wiped over the labels and the plastic outer covering slid, smearing the printed information and making the english label illegible. The brake warning statement is still entirely visible, but only the french version print is legible, since I did not rub over it. At the time, the engine compartment was warm, since the engine had been running. This labels problem happened on Saturday, April 1, 2000.

See all problems of Ford Windstar and all Labels problems of Ford Windstar.

car   Labels problem of GMC Yukon

The vehicle involved is a 1999 GMC Yukon. When a passenger got inside of vehicle and closed rear driver's side door, consumer started driving, and door opened up. There wasn't any warning sign on the dashboard letting consumer know that door was open. It was May. 1, 1999 when this labels issue happened.

See all problems of GMC Yukon and all Labels problems of GMC Yukon.

car   Labels problem of GMC Sonoma

The vehicle identification number (VIN) of the car was 1GTDT13X24_. Consumer letter regarding the recall for 2004 GMC Sonoma air bag warning label located on the sun visor. The consumer received an e-mail which stated he would receive the labels to install, however when he went to inquire about it at the dealer, they stated they had no knowledge of the recall. The consumer went to another dealer who installed a temporary decal. The consumer still has not received the permanent label. This labels problem happened on 03/01/2005.

See all problems of GMC Sonoma and all Labels problems of GMC Sonoma.

car   Labels problem of Honda Odyssey

Have had two Honda Odysseys (one new 2008 and one used 2006). Both had issues with the right and left rear automated sliding doors. The new van had this problem much less than the older one, but both have had multiple occurrences of this problem. The problem sometimes come and go sporadically and sometimes needs to be taken to the shop to be fixed. The door usually shuts, but then pops open just enough that it is not fully closed. Sometimes they will not latch at all. I thought that this was just "our luck" but after looking online I realized that this is obviously an ongoing major safety issue that is well known on the web. In our families case, I can say that the incidences were not related to anything that could have been done to "break" the door. I feel that if indeed this could be labeled as a wear and tear issue that this is an unacceptable safety issue that needs a widespread permanent "fix" from Honda. It was Wednesday, May. 16, 2012 when this labels issue happened.

See all problems of Honda Odyssey and all Labels problems of Honda Odyssey.

car   Labels problem of Honda Pilot

The VIN of the problem Pilot is 2HKYF18174_. Consumer would like reimbursement for two tires replaced on a 2004 Honda Pilot. The consumer mechanic noticed uneven tread wear on the rear tires. The vehicle was taken to the tire dealer for inspection. The technician informed the consumer that she definitely needed new tires but that there was nothing they could do other than sell her new tires. The tire were only two years old. The consumer purchase new tires elsewhere for a better price. The consumer mechanic stated that low tire pressure could cause wear. The mechanic checked the other two tires pressure and discovered that the tires were underinflated at 32 psi. The pressure in the doorjamb of the vehicle also indicated 32 psi. The mechanic looked on the tire and saw that the max psi was 44 and informed the consumer that she should maintain 40 psi, no less. This problem occurred on April 1, 2006.

See all problems of Honda Pilot and all Labels problems of Honda Pilot.

car   Labels problem of Hyundai Sonata

The car was a 2006 Hyundai Sonata. The VIN of this vehicle is KMHET46C86_. The safety labels on the visors have curled up and lost their adhesion to the visors making the labels unreadable. The vehicle was manufactured on 4/26/05. A NHTSA safety recall, campaign id no. 06v234000 was issued for this defect for vehicles built may 15, 2005 through August 2005. This recall was inadequate to include all affected vehicles. It should be expanded to include these earlier built vehicles. This labels problem happened on 02/02/12.

See all problems of Hyundai Sonata and all Labels problems of Hyundai Sonata.

car   Labels problem of Hyundai Tiburon

The car involved was a 1999 Hyundai Tiburon. While driving at various speeds the transmission would down shift from high gear to lower gear and then lock up. The vehicle would jerk forward and remain in the lowest gear when this happened. The wheel would lock up just prior to being release. The vehicle has been to the dealer who changed the speed sensors 3 months before the transmission was replaced. The speed sensor was replaced 2 times. The pulse generator was replaced a total of 4 times. The thermostat has also been replaced. Also there was a tire label replacement. Stopper and elr seat belt was installed. Blade fuse and wire repairs. Hood latch cleaned. Dealership most recently found the transmission had internal problems and replaced the transmission and flushed the cooler lines. The failure date was Jun. 9, 2000.

See all problems of Hyundai Tiburon and all Labels problems of Hyundai Tiburon.

car   Labels problem of Jeep Wrangler

The car is a 2005 Jeep Wrangler. Consumer complaint regarding tire pressure in the 30 inch tires. The vehicle came factory equipped with 30 inch tires, which was an upgrade option from the standard 15 inch tire. However upon having the vehicle serviced the consumer was informed that the tire pressure on the specifications label - 29 psi - was incorrect. The correct tire pressure for the 30 inch tires is 40 psi. The consumer contacted the manufacturer for clarification and was told that the correct tire inflation was actually 38 psi. The dealer informed the consumer that the label was correct and that the listed value of 29 psi is a minimum pressure only. A new label was supposed to be mailed but never arrived. Updated 11/16/05. This labels issue occurred Jan. 1, 1901.

See all problems of Jeep Wrangler and all Labels problems of Jeep Wrangler.

car   Labels problem of Jeep Wrangler

The vehicle was a 2001 Jeep Wrangler. The vehicle identification number (VIN) is 1J4FA49S21_. The tire placard on the door states wrong information, tire size (p215/75r15) with a tire pressure of 33 lbs, consumer states that the 2002 owners manual has been changed to show all tire sizes with correct air pressures .

See all problems of Jeep Wrangler and all Labels problems of Jeep Wrangler.

car   Labels problem of Lexus LS400

The vehicle involved is a 1998 Lexus Ls400. Air bag warning labels are very distracting due to location.

See all problems of Lexus LS400 and all Labels problems of Lexus LS400.

car   Labels problem of Lexus ES300

The vehicle was a 1997 Lexus Es300. The owner is six feet tall and his vision is impaired by the large yellow/black air bag warning label which reflects onto windshield. Lexus corporation says this is the way the vehicles were shipped. Please describe details.

See all problems of Lexus ES300 and all Labels problems of Lexus ES300.

car   Labels problem of Mazda RX8

The car involved was a 2005 Mazda RX-8. The vehicle certification label on the inside door panel shows the gross vehicle weight information and the VIN number, but the tire pressure and wheel size information is left blank. This issue happened on Thursday, May 11, 2006.

See all problems of Mazda RX8 and all Labels problems of Mazda RX8.

car   Labels problem of Mazda MPV

The vehicle involved is a 2000 Mazda Mpv. The vehicle's vehicle identification number (VIN) is JM3LW28G0Y_. The door label and the tire specification table in the owners manual is incorrectly marked, the tires do not need to be replaced as a result of this recall (dunlop). Nlm.

See all problems of Mazda MPV and all Labels problems of Mazda MPV.

car   Labels problem of Mercury Sable

The car was a 2000 Mercury Sable. The VIN of the car is 1MEFM59S1Y_. The vehicle failed to conform to the requirements of Ford's tire selection and rims thus the vehicle cannot be loaded with the maximum amount of people (8) and luggage at the same time, the consumer is very unhappy with the recall (oov-242) and believes the vehicle was falsely advertised. Nlm.

See all problems of Mercury Sable and all Labels problems of Mercury Sable.

car   Labels problem of Mercury Sable

The car was a 2000 Mercury Sable. The vehicle identification number (VIN) is 1MEFM5952Y_. Dealership refused to do recall 00v242000 concerning equipment certification label. Made many attempts, still no suggestion. This issue happened on Oct. 15, 2001.

See all problems of Mercury Sable and all Labels problems of Mercury Sable.

car   Labels problem of Nissan Altima

The car was a 2002 Nissan Altima. VIN of the vehicle was 1N4AL11E92_. The consumer stated that the vehicle is lacking a sticker which shows the correct tire pressure to be maintained. This problem occurred on 11/16/00.

See all problems of Nissan Altima and all Labels problems of Nissan Altima.

car   Labels problem of Nissan Altima

The car involved was a 2002 Nissan Altima. The vehicle identification number (VIN) of the car was 1N4AL11E92_. The consumer stated that the vehicle is lacking a sticker which shows the correct tire pressure to be maintained. This labels issue occurred 11/16/2000.

See all problems of Nissan Altima and all Labels problems of Nissan Altima.

car   Labels problem of Subaru Legacy

The vehicle involved is a 1998 Subaru Legacy. A tire went flat, so consumer put on spare, this resulted in damage to the rear differential and transfer case, these parts overheated and had to be quickly hosed down with water to prevent a fire, in the owners manual it states that the all wheel drive system needs to be disengaged if a spare tire is ever used, however consumer did not notice these special instructions and feels this damage would not have occurred if a warning sticker would have been on the spare tire, consumer is requesting reimbursement.

See all problems of Subaru Legacy and all Labels problems of Subaru Legacy.

car   Labels problem of Subaru Legacy

The vehicle involved was a 1998 Subaru Legacy. A tire went flat, so consumer put on spare, this resulted in damage to the rear differential and transfer case, these parts overheated and had to be quickly hosed down with water to prevent a fire, in the owners manual it states that the all wheel drive system needs to be disengaged if a spare tire is ever used, however consumer did not notice these special instructions and feels this damage would not have occurred if a warning sticker would have been on the spare tire, consumer is requesting reimbursement.

See all problems of Subaru Legacy and all Labels problems of Subaru Legacy.

car   Labels problem of Toyota Sienna

The car involved was a 2011 Toyota Sienna. Vehicle identification number (VIN) of the vehicle is 5TDDK3DC7B_. The tires on my van have excessive wear and need to be replaced after only 20,000 miles. I installed a hitch on the car myself shortly after purchasing the vehicle and used it to tow. I received a safety recall notice from Toyota for my 2011 Sienna awd minivan that reads "the tire and loading information placard does not state the correct vehicle capacity weight as the rated load for the combination of cargo and occupants. Incorrect information on the vehicle placard may lead to tire overloading and possibly cause tire failure, increasing the risk of a crash. " it goes on to say "based upon this information Toyota has determined that the following actions will brin your vehicle into compliance with the applicable requirements: replacement of the factory installed tires with new extra load tires. " it also says ". . . The dealer will replace the tires and label/placard noted above at no charge to you. " I spent over 90 minutes at the dealer and 20 minutes on the phone with Toyota. They refused to honor their recall because the hitch on the car was an after-market hitch and not installed by Toyota. I fail to understand why they are not honoring their recall and their offer to replace the tires simply because the hitch was not purchased through Toyota. It was Thu., Aug. 1, 2013 when this labels issue happened.

See all problems of Toyota Sienna and all Labels problems of Toyota Sienna.

car   Labels problem of Toyota Tacoma

2007 Toyota Tacoma. Consumer writes in regards to 5 recalls on vehicle the consumer stated over the last five years there were approximately five recalls on the vehicle and the dealer refused to remedy them, which made the vehicle almost worthless. This labels issue occurred Sat., Sep. 1, 2012.

See all problems of Toyota Tacoma and all Labels problems of Toyota Tacoma.

car   Labels problem of Volkswagen Eurovan

The vehicle was a 2003 Volkswagen Eurovan. No certification labels and instructions on air pressure for the front and rear tires. Dealer stated ,call the manufacturer, but at the same time can inflate front tires at 28 pounds, and rear tires at 32 pounds. It was August 25, 2003 when this labels issue happened.

See all problems of Volkswagen Eurovan and all Labels problems of Volkswagen Eurovan.

car   Labels problem of Volvo S60

The vehicle is a 2013 Volvo S60. The vehicle identification number (VIN) of this Volvo S60 is YV1612FS7D_. The tire and loading information label on my car has 4 errors. 1. Loading: the installed label specifies a weight limit of 1200 lbs. The correct weight limit for my car is 1025 lbs. 2. Front tire size: the installed label says my car has 215/50r17 front tires. The car has 235/45r17 tires. Volvo cars of north America confirmed that 235/45r17 tires were installed at the factory. 3. Front tire pressure: the installed label specifies 38psi, but the correct value is 36psi. 4. Rear tire size: same error as front tire size. 5. Rear tire pressure: same error as front tire pressure. It was 12/31/2012 when this labels issue occurred.

See all problems of Volvo S60 and all Labels problems of Volvo S60.

car   Labels problem of Volvo S40

The vehicle was a 2003 Volvo S40. Consumer indicated that the isofix guide that the manufacturer sent for recall 03v284000 could not fix the problem. It was Monday, February 9, 2004 when this labels issue occurred.

See all problems of Volvo S40 and all Labels problems of Volvo S40.

car   Labels problem of Audi A6

The vehicle is a 2001 Audi A6. The vehicle's vehicle identification number (VIN) is PLEASE FIL_. Consumer called complaining about two sticker on the vehicle that specify tire pressure one that recomends 30psi and the other that recomends 40psi also states that when he had the tire preasure at 30 psi he two tires that fell and ended with blisters. Goodyear original equipment.

See all problems of Audi A6 and all Labels problems of Audi A6.

car   Labels problem of Audi A6

The car involved is a 2001 Audi A6. Vehicle identification number (VIN): WAUED54B71_. According to the vehicle tire sticker on the driver's door the tire pressure should be 46-psi per tire. The dealer technician stated that the maximum air pressure should be 44 psi per tire. When the consumer contacted the manufacturer they asked the consumer to ignore the sticker and inflate 34 psi air pressure per tire. Seeking NHTSA help in this matter. This labels issue occurred November 4, 2003.

See all problems of Audi A6 and all Labels problems of Audi A6.

car   Labels problem of BMW 750

The vehicle involved was a 1996 BMW 750. The VIN of this vehicle is WBAGK2327T_. No country of origin labeling sticker and no monroney/msrp sticker.

See all problems of BMW 750 and all Labels problems of BMW 750.

car   Labels problem of BMW 325

The car involved was a 2002 BMW 325i. My new car came with 4 225/45 zr 17 tires, both the owners manual and door jam sticker do not give the recommended tire pressure for the rear tires. I've contacted the dealer and the BMW owners line on multiple occasions and no one has been able to provide me with the mfg. Reccomendation nor have they been willing to provide an updated sticker for the tires that came with my new car. I feel that having the proper mfg. Recommended tire pressure is a critical safety issue and to date BMW has not provided me with the information.

See all problems of BMW 325 and all Labels problems of BMW 325.

car   Labels problem of Buick Regal

Vehicle identification number (VIN): 2G4GV5GV6C_. The vehicle involved is a 2012 Buick Regal GS. The contact stated that the tire pressure indicator sticker, located on the front driver's door, specified to inflate the tires to 80 pounds per square inch. The contact notified the tire manufacturer, who stated that the tire label information was incorrect and the correct tire pressure was 38 pounds per square inch. The manufacturer of the vehicle was notified and was unable to provide assistance. The failure mileage was 220. It was Sunday, May. 6, 2012 when this labels issue happened.

See all problems of Buick Regal and all Labels problems of Buick Regal.

car   Labels problem of Buick Regal

The car involved was a 2001 Buick Regal. The vehicle's vehicle identification number (VIN) was 2G4WB55KX1_. There is an air bag warning sticker located on both sunvisors, it distracts driver's view. Cannot remove label by hands. Dealer refused to remove label, stating by law it can not be removed. This problem occurred on 09/03/2002.

See all problems of Buick Regal and all Labels problems of Buick Regal.

car   Labels problem of Jaguar XJ8

The vehicle is a 2001 Jaguar Xj8. The consumer has experienced the following: the rear defroster is inop, the ashtray cover is not closing, the subframe is defective- developed a crack a week after driving, and the new subfame has multiple welded areas. Scc.

See all problems of Jaguar XJ8 and all Labels problems of Jaguar XJ8.

car   Labels problem of Jaguar XJ8

The vehicle involved is a 2001 Jaguar Xj8. The consumer has experienced the following: the rear defroster is inop, the ashtray cover is not closing, the subframe is defective- developed a crack a week after driving, and the new subfame has multiple welded areas. Scc.

See all problems of Jaguar XJ8 and all Labels problems of Jaguar XJ8.