Table 1 shows one common seat belt related problems of the 2024 Honda CR-V.
| Problem Category | Number of Problems |
|---|---|
| Seat Belt problems |
The contact owns a 2024 Honda Cr-v. The contact stated that the passenger’s side rear seat belt failed to remain secured inside the buckle. The contact stated that the seat belt sensor remained illuminated, and the seat belt was not secured. The part number was 6155974. The dealer was contacted and confirmed that the part was not covered under warranty. The manufacturer was informed of the failure and directed the contact to the dealer for the vehicle to be inspected and repaired. The failure mileage was 39,715.
I purchased a 2024 Honda Cr-v hybrid (VIN [xxx] ) that was represented as having only an airbag replacement. A certified Honda dealer inspection has revealed multiple serious safety defects: •driver seat belt buckle malfunction (dtc b0050-f0): the seat belt does not function properly and cannot be repaired without replacing the floor harness. This violates fmvss 209 (seat belt safety standards). •rear differential/esc fault (dtc c1851-18): the differential shows signs of prior impact damage, metal shavings were found in the fluid, and the gearbox must be replaced. This affects awd and electronic stability control (esc), which is federally required under fmvss 126. These issues were not disclosed by the selling dealer. The vehicle was sold “as-is,” but selling a car with a defective seat belt and esc system creates a major safety hazard. Repairs are estimated at $8,692. 92 on a vehicle with less than 2,000 miles. This vehicle is unsafe to drive and should never have been sold in this condition. The vehicle was purchased from central autohaus, dallas, TX, on [xxx]. The dealer only disclosed an airbag replacement but did not disclose the seat belt defect or impact damage to the power train/esc. Information redacted pursuant to the freedom of information act (foia), 5 u. S. C. 552(b)(6).
The driver seatbelt mechanism when clipped is shaped in such a way that it presses on the driver hip joint causing nerve damage, pain, numbness in the pain and back. Because of the seatbelt mechanism shape and placement, seat adjustments cannot be made sufficient to alleviate the pain without impairing the driver’s ability to see over the steering wheel and/or reach the pedals.
I placed a bid on a vehicle at the CO-part location in [xxx] . I reviewed the damage etc. And found it to be an acceptable risk. It was advertised that the car was in an accident with the passenger side and front grill damage. Here was allegedly no damage to the motor and most importantly the airbags had not deployed. It was being sold with a salvaged title. Knowing these issues, I purchased the vehicle, had it towed to miami and began the repairs. I purchased all genuine Honda parts from the dealer and still I could not have all of the lights reset. Upon taking it to another dealership, I learned that my rear seatbelts needed to be replaced, as well as all of the airbags as they had been cut out of the vehicle and the areas where they were located have been closed using drywall screws, some of which are still there. The described condition of the vehicle directly influenced my decision to purchase this vehicle. The lack of airbags could not be discovered from an inspection. I spent over $27,000 to purchase and repair this car as I believed that it was a newer car with much longevity. I was misled by the offer from copart, and the actions of this company amount to deceptive business practices and possibly even fraud in the inducement. The description of the vehicle and its condition, specifically that the airbags were not deployed, led me to believe that the car was as described. Copart either knew or should have known based on the information provided from the lien holder/insurance that either the airbags had all deployed, and those would have been shown in the photos or that they were still in the car and somehow went "missing" while in the custody of copart. Copart knew this and yet they continued to advertise the airbags as intact. Copart knew that the condition of the car was worse than advertised and that the "as is" terms do not shield copart from the liability of this misrepresentation as this was apparently intentional or reckless. Information redacted pursuant to the freedom of information act (f.