59 problems related to brake disc rotor have been reported for the 1996 Jeep Grand Cherokee. The most recently reported issues are listed below.
When applying brakes under regular braking conditions, no inclement weather, there is a lot of vibration and shaking. The rotors were turned at 30000 miles because they were repeatedly warping. Currently, at 40,000 miles the condition is back. 8ak.
Vehicle experienced failure of the recall component (00v-136) prior to recall notification, consumer requesting reimbursement.
Vehicle experienced failure of the recall component (00v-136) on several occasions prior to recall notification, consumer is requesting reimbursement.
Rear left rotor rusted/corroded, brake pads are not touching rotor. Brakes make loud squeaking noise. According to dealer, not a safety matter brakes working normally. Replaced rotor, now new rotor has rusted/corroded.
Both front brake rotors warped. In addition, transmission failed 3 times; engine head cylinder had eight misfires; power seats fold down into back seat; defective transfer case and air conditioning switch failed.
Replaced noisy right front brake rotor.
Consumer received recal 00v136000 in Jul 5, 2000 for rotors, and less than 8,000 miles there was a sign of corrision on front rotors again. Please provide further information. The rotors were replaced again by the dealer because the rotors were exposed to some kind of solvent.
Recall 00 v 136 000. Replacment rotors have gone bad, resulting in extended stopping distance.
While looking brakes over noticed back brake rotors were rusted. Consumer states rotors on front and rear are extremely deficient, the front rotors had a recall and the back rotors are as bad and affect the emergency brakes.
While traveling when depressing brakes noticed vibration and pulsation. Technician stated that rotors needed to be replaced. Please provide further information.
In order for the consumers vehicle to be equipped with desired options the dealer sourced the vehicle from canada, consumer recieved recall notice 00v-136 for faulty rotors and made an appointment, the service dept logged the vehicle in but the consumer was told that they could not perform work because the vehicle was coming up as being register in kilometers instead of miles, the consumer stated the the vehicle was changed over to miles before he took delivery but dealer still refused repair vehicle because the change was not recorded with Chrysler by the dealer. Nlm.
I sent a detailed letter to daimler Chrysler after being refused by dealer. They only refunded my money for the cost of the front rotors. They would not reimburse me for the labor charges. I can't understand how they can do that when I had them replaced before the recall. That should show there is a problem. I wrote about all my problems with this "lemon" but I could not claim it was a lemon because I was leasing it at the time and in PA, a vehicle can only be declared a "lemon" when it is purchased, not leased. Very dissatisfied with daimler/Chrysler because they simply washed their hands of the entire problem. I have other problems to report, along with the receipts to prove they were investigated but nothing was ever done to correct the problems. Please contact me to forward all receipts proving complaints before warranty expired. Thank you.
The vehicle's front rotors were starting to pit and corrode. The dealer has been contacted. There is a recall for the same problem. Recall # 00 v 136 000. Both dealer and manufacturer refused to honor recall repair on consumer's vehicle. They're claiming that the recall doesn't apply to the vehicle because was not in ohio when recall was issued.
Vehicle experienced failure of the recall component (00v-136) prior to notification, consumer was charged for service.
Rear brake rotors have cracked and corroded to the point where dealer cannot machine them down. Rotors had to be replaced. Front rotors were replaced under recall 879.
Front brake rotor problem was covered by daimler recall 879. Seems that rear brake rotors should have been covered, too, since they needed to be replaced for the same reason of corrosion.
Vehicle experienced failure of the recall component (00v-136) prior to recall notification, consumer is requesting reimbursement.
Front brake rotors failed prior to recall notice (00v-136). Yh.
Rear brake rotors are severley corroded, causing major groves on the inside and outside of the rotors. Please give any further details.
Rear brake rotors have prematurely corroded, cause unknown. Recall issued for front corroded rotors. Back brakes and rotors also checked and they were also found to be corroded. Replaced at owner's cost.
Vehicle experienced failure of the recall component prior to recall notification and is requesting reimbursement (00v-136).
Vehicle experienced recall component failure prior to recall notification, at time of incident rotors were pitted and full of holes, owner requesting reimbursement. (00v-136) 8mjs.
The consumer has had the brakes and rotors turned or replaced every 3-6 months. Nlm.
After having the brake pads replaced dealer noticed rotors were rusting out or flaking which was creating an unsafe condition. Also, due to the brake rotors flaking, hub may eventually separate from the rotors. Please provide any further details.