general problems of the 2012 Mercedes Benz C300 - part 2

The contact owns a 2012 mercedes-benz C300. The contact stated that while having an oil change performed on the vehicle by an independent mechanic, he was informed that the cross member was severely corroded. The contact was informed by the mechanic that the vehicle was unsafe to drive. Neither the dealer nor the manufacturer had been notified of the failure. The vehicle was not repaired. The failure mileage was approximately 125,000.

Rare subframe breaking off parts are not available for at least 6 months. I have kids and mechanics advise me to keep it off the road. My only means of transportation.

Subframe corroded/rusted out. Car is in excellent condition with no other rust or corrosion. Car has 58,800 miles and regularly maintained by dealer. Took car to tirediscounter because of noise. Mechanic put car on lift and reviewed corrosion and other damaged cause by failed part. Mechanic called mb service department and was told that parts on 5- 6 months back order because of this issue. But no recall even though problem is wide spread. Rear tires and gas tanked damaged by loose subframe.

Diagnosed with broken rear sub frame: "broken rear sub frame, left side lower link is broken off and contacting fuel tank. Rear tires are also bald and care is unsafe to drive". Recall in canada, but not USA. Sub frames on backorder until January 2023. I have three years of payment left, and am now being quoted 6,300 from the mb service ctr in wilmington DE to fix this problem. Again, the items are on backorder due to heavy demand. Im a single mom we depend on my car to get us to work. This is the ultimate catch 22 as the car is extremely dangerous to drive and put us all in serious jeopardy - but no one will take this broken car as a trade in. I am forced to drive the vehicle while I wait for backordered parts and pray that I can get a loan to pay for it. "". . . . . And contacting the fuel tank". . . . .

The contact owns a 2012 mercedes-benz C300. The contact stated while driving 25 mph going downhill, the rear end of the vehicle shifted independently to the right. The contact stated no warning light was illuminated. The contact was able to continue driving at a slow speed to her destination. The contact stated her husband inspected the vehicle and became aware that the rear subframe cross member had fractured due to corrosion. The vehicle was not diagnosed or repaired. A dealer was not contacted. The manufacturer had been informed of the failure. The failure mileage was approximately 149,000.

Dealer states that the rear subframe has rusted and degraded to the point of requiring full replacement. The car is 10 years old with 98,000 miles on the odometer. This is premature degradation of an essential component.

The contact owns a 2012 mercedes-benz C300. The contact stated that upon taking his vehicle to a dealer for maintenance repairs; he was provided an estimate for the repair of corrosion to the rear subframe of the vehicle. Upon investigation, the contact discovered that the failure could lead to a potential braking system failure. The manufacturer was notified of the failure and informed him that there were no recalls on the vehicle. The vehicle was not repaired. The failure mileage was approximately 97,000.

The rear sub frame has rusted out and broken causing the car to veer suddenly to the left during braking. A quick search of the internet reveals that this is a common problem with this car. The dealership has quoted me $4,000 for the repairs.

I ran off the road and my rear suspension sub frame literally broke in half. Upon further research I’ve learned that these parts are faulty and several people have had theirs rust completely in two. Mine had lots of rust damage and that is likely what caused the damage to mine when I ran off the road (minor impact that should have never caused that much damage). Mercedes has recalled this part in several countries including germany and canada. When I drove home after running off the road my car was nearly impossible to drive. It was jerking all over the road and when I tapped the brakes the rear end of the car would come up off of the road (into the air)! this was in June. It’s now September and I still have not been able to obtain a part from mercedes. So many people are having this issue with their vehicles that the part is on back order until q1 of 2023. This is a part of the cars sub frame that is rusting in two! one would argue a broken sub frame is dangerous. And it’s such a prominent issue the part is on back order. Furthermore, mercedes has changed the type of metal used in replacement parts, which is an acknowledgment of the parts defect.

So here I am - another "happy" driver with a rotten subframe. Started noticing instability on the highway speeds a few months ago. Cracking noises lately. Since I use this car my very honest mechanic immediately told me that my rear subframe is completely done and I should not be driving the car until it is replaced. He quoted me $4500 (oem parts + labor), but suggested that I take my car to mb and insist on covering the repair costs as this issue did not seem typical to him at all. I started googling and ended up here. Seems like this is a common issue and sounds like mb will replace the subframe for free in some other countries (cananda and germany, . The dealer said the repair will cost over $5000. 00 this is a safety issue, a real big one. And the fact it's covered in other countries is so not fair. I own another mercedes and now I feel the cars are not as safe as they used to be. Please let me know what I need to do next.

Part number: 207-350-97-02 this is the sub frame part number, during routine maintenance I found a cracked rear sub frame mount. Upon googling, there are hundreds of owners with that same problem. Cars with milage ranging from 40,000-150,0000 with the same issue. Under hard braking the car is unstable. When I called the mb dealer to inquire about the problem they did confirm that the problem is known but is not a safety recall and the repair bill is near $5,000. So mercedes, confirmed it’s a known issue with a faulty part, confirmed it was a safety issue with the 2008-2012 mercedes C300 and is not covering it.

The contact owns a 2012 mercedes-benz C300. The contact stated while driving 70 mph, there was an abnormally loud sound from the rear of the vehicle. The contact lost control of the vehicle. There was no warning light illuminated. The contact was able to continue normal driving once he regained control of the vehicle. The contact scheduled an appointment with an independent mechanic for the vehicle to be inspected. The contact was informed that the rear subframe had detached from the passenger’s side of the vehicle due to severe corrosion. The dealer was notified of the failure and informed him that there were no recalls related to the failure on his vehicle. The manufacturer was not notified of the failure. The vehicle was not repaired. The failure mileage was approximately 138,000.

The contact owns a 2012 mercedes-benz C300. The contact stated while driving at 65-70 mph, he heard abnormal clicking sounds coming from the rear of the vehicle. Additionally, the contact stated that while driving and depressing the brake pedal to come to a complete stop, the vehicle swerved while stopping. The vehicle was taken to an independent mechanic where it was diagnosed that the rear driver's side subframe was severely corroded and fractured and needed to be replaced. The dealer was notified of the failure and informed the contact that the vehicle would be repaired at his own expense. The vehicle was not repaired. The manufacturer was notified of the failure but did not provide any assistance. The failure mileage was approximately 75,000.

The rear k frame on Mercedes Benz C300 totaly rusted through and broke apart causing the entire rear of vehicle to rest upon the fuel tank. The failure also caused stress on rear brake lines. The vehicle is 10 years old with 90,000 miles purchased brand new and garaged. Mercedes has performed a recall on canada vehicles but no USA vehicles. This is total negligence. This is going to cause a fatality. Either a vehicle will catch fire or brake lines will fail and cause an accident. The vehicle is known by the dealers to have this damage/failure. I googled and found numerous cases. Mercedes was not willing to stand by the vehicle and repair. This should be a recall like it is in canada. I was quoted $5000. 00 to repair by mercedes.

Failure of rear subframe causes car to lose control. Only found out about the problem after I received a mercedes extended warranty in mail March 2023, roughly 6 months after oem undercarriage failed and forced me to purchase another undercarriage in cash/no insurance involved because part back ordered for many months. Car thus inoperable for roughly 4 months. At moment of the oem failure, total loss of control. Mercedes refuses to reimburse for cost of replacing undercarriage regardless of the fact that failure occurred before notification and regardless of fact that part unavailable for months.

From the mechanics notes: four-wheel alignment could not be completed. Attempts to align the rear axle were unsuccessful due to flexing/movement in the rear suspension. A brief road test revealed occasional suspension “clunking” coming from the rear of the vehicle. Close examination of every suspension component mount revealed heavy cracking on the passenger side lower drag link subframe mount (see emailed image). The driver’s side low drag link mount location is also starting to show signs of overstress and rust/flaking. This is a known design defect that has been the subject of a manufacturer’s recall in canada. Given the substantial safety impact of this design defect/failure, it is expected that a us recall will be forthcoming. Proper repair of this failure involves removing the entire rear axle/subframe assembly and either rebuilding/re enforcing the subframe or replacing it with a new unit and transferring all the suspension components to the new subframe. A current check of subframe availability is showing nla (no longer available) status from mercedes wholesale dealers – likely due to recent high demand and inability to satisfy that demand. This supply issue may also be playing a role in mercedes’ failure to address this high level safety issue with a us based recall campaign. The manufacturer may be ramping up production of this component to address anticipated need – waiting to announce a recall when it has sufficient parts on hand to execute the campaign. It is strongly recommended that you file an NHTSA complaint for this issue and limit driving until the problem is rectified either independently or under the auspices of a recall campaign. The passenger side rear drag link has not yet completely separated from the subframe but is likely to do so soon which can result in an accident or loss of control as this critical suspension link is responsible for maintaining steering direction of the right rear wheel.

I took my vehicle in for a state inspection and was informed the rear subframe was rusted/rotting and on the verge of detaching. Had this happened while driving, the results could have been catastrophic. The vehicle cannot be driven until this $4k dollar repair is completed. Upon speaking with the mechanic, this is a well known issue within mercedes. Had I not asked for an alignment, this would have remained undiscovered until it inevitably broke off while driving the vehicle. This is a major safety issue and a safety recall should be issued.

I drove over an object on the highway and noticed my car veering left and wobbly when turning. A week after, it is squealing like a load of piglets in my trunk whenever I go over a bump, then my battery light came on and I took it to the shop and contacted my insurance, who denied my claim saying it was 'wear and tear'.

While performing service inspection, technician found rear sub frame rusted and ready to break. Told they needed to show me the problem on the lift, as it was a serious safety issue and should be immediately replaced. Dealer and service acknowledged that this is a known and widespread problem in c class vehicles. Cost to replace quoted at $4200. No warning - thankfully inspection found before I was in a serious accident! mercedes should issue recall for failed/corroded frame. Not the "safe" vehicle that mercedes claims. (car has been dealer serviced regularly, garaged, and 34,000 miles. ) owners shouldn't have to suddenly come up with $4,200 in order to drive their seemingly normal car. Dangerous.

Rear subframe failure caused me to loose control of vehicle almost resulting in a serious highway accident. Rear driver side stabilizer subframe mount was completely corroded and broken away from the subframe. There is no other significant corrosion on the subframe. Mb claim normal corrosion however the pictures tell a different story.

2012 Mercedes Benz C300 4-matic; failure of rear subframe, significant crack of an important support member; very limited minor corrosion of the other parts of the frame, seems to be a manufacturing quality defect in a very specific part. Vehicle has been inspected by a highly qualified independent mechanic and by the closest manufacture's dealer in massachusetts. Car cannot be driven because it is unsafe to do so. Both the dealer's service department and the independent repair shop have advised and confirmed this. Limited research online seems to indicate that this problem is well known by Mercedes Benz, and the manufacturer has issued recalls in other countries and has taken some responsibility for this defect. However, in the USA, Mercedes Benz has not issued a recall, to the best of my knowledge. It certainly seems that they should have done so. It is highly likely that many owners with this problem lack the knowledge or experience needed to report this problem to the appropriate authorities. I happen to have an above average knowledge regarding automobiles. I first became aware of this problem in Nov. , 2021. The vehicle is available for inspection by your department if you deem appropriate.

The rear drivers side had a loud chunking/clanking noise while driving and the vehicle was unable to control and break when in motion. Driving was impossible as the breaking component was a total failure and car could not be controlled while traveling down 45-50mph zone. I reduced my speed to 20-25 mph by letting off on the gas to get better control of the car if breaking would need to be suddenly made. I relied on the shoulder to pull off if any sudden breaking was needed. The car was immediately take to be reviewed by a specialized Mercedes Benz mechanic and further inspection proved that the rear subframe on the driver’s (left) side was corroded and broken. The connecting arms are rusted, corroded and rendered the car inoperative. I notified my insurance company as well as car manufacturers corporate office. I researched this issue further and discovered that this reoccurring issue with this make and model. There are a pheletera of recounting of this same issue on various message boards to validate the same issues and callouts I found. The car was taken to the dealership that it was purchased and further inspection showed that the left side subframe/ subframe arms were corroded with rust and broken. The brake lines and fuel tank were equally rusted and corroded. The service manager confirmed that this is defect of the car but it had been part of a recall. I had the car towed for 2nd opinion to another dealership service department to access the car and this callout further validated the corrosion and rust was wide spread and has rendered the car inoperable unless these damages were fixed.

Rear subframe (as recalled in previous years) was completed corroded - failed virginia inspection - in such poor shape that entire subframe had to be replaced - corrosion riddled the piece so that huge holes resulted in no possibility of welding to fix/supplement weakness - auto repair place had not seen such a weak frame in such a relatively new car. Luckily - no accident occured but could easily have occurred due to corrosion. No other part of vehicle was corroded - so part was manufactured incorrectly (no corrosion control?/shipment from germany issue?) - Mercedes Benz has recall for this part in previous model years - pictures of subframe available upon demand.

The rear subframe rusted through causing mounting point of the torque link to fail. As a result, the car looses control when braking going sideways. Luckily, I discovered it when testing brakes after pad replacement in a safe setting. To my understanding, there are many other w204/w212 cars affected in the us with that issue. Mercedes so far does not want to take responsibility and recall cars for this issue which is a huge concern.

Driving low speed in town in fair weather and hit brakes, noise and strange "looseness" in back end. Had nearby service station inspect and rear sub frame had rusted out, searched and found multiple reports of exact issue. Confirmed w/ local mb dealer known issue and they are seeing about 1 month now.

The back sub frame rotted away from rust.