general problems of the 2005 Subaru Outback

See attached document for complaint.

Vehicle brakes failed while driving, the brake pedal went to the floor and almost caused a serious car accident. Yes, vehicle and brake lines are available for inspection upon request. My safety, the safety of others and more importantly my life and the lives of others were severely threatened because of the major break failure that occurred. It is terrifying to think that I was unknowingly driving around this vehicle with an imminent accident that could happen anytime, without any warning, which could have killed me. After taking pictures of my brake lines, recording videos and doing some quick research, I called a local to inspect my brake lines. I told them the scenario that I experienced and reported to them that my brake lines were covered in rust. I told them that I found out my vehicle had a recall remedy done on the brake lines in 2017, which is before I owned the vehicle. I told them that the rust and corrosion was in the same spots that were supposed to be fixed in the recall repair and that I am positive that the repair was done incorrectly or the repair was not done at all. I requested they take pictures of the brake lines and show them to the manufacturer or use the photos I took but they ensured they would take care of all of that. Called for update a week later and was unable to get in contact with anyone. I waited over a month before one of my calls was finally answered. I was told they still hadn’t looked at my vehicle yet. Having no vehicle had a very negative impact towards my job because I had no transportation for so long. I called back a few days later and was told that they would not repair my vehicle. My vehicle was not inspected by the police or insurance because I wasn’t in an accident. I was less then a minute from home when this life threatening incident occurred and thankfully was able to pull the car into my driveway. No warning lamps, no messages and no symptoms of the problem were present prior to this life threatening occurrence.

The contact owns a 2005 Subaru Outback. The contact stated while driving 30 mph, the brake pedal was depressed and went to the floorboard. The brake warning light was illuminated. The contact was able to drive home where he inspected the vehicle and discovered severe corrosion at a connection point on the brake line. The contact stated that the brake line was leaking brake fluid. Upon investigation, the contact linked the failure to NHTSA campaign number: 14v311000 (service brakes, hydraulic). The manufacturer was notified of the failure and informed the contact that the vehicle had already been serviced previously under the recall. The vehicle was not repaired. The failure mileage was approximately 180,000.

Vehicle experienced sudden complete brake failure while driving due to a rupture in brake system in the exact area of a known defect / recalls NHTSA Subaru recall wqg-43 and wqk-47 (both completed) which had been issued to inspect and repair the defect. Safety of driver / occupants were immediately put at grave risk due to inability to slow or stop vehicle. Car was traveling on a two way high traffic road at a speed of approximately 30+mph. I was able to stop slowly using the emergency hand brake though only after attempting to pump the brakes which became absolutely unresponsive (this took approximately 7-10 seconds while pumping the brake pedal). It was pure luck that there was no one directly in front of me at the time. If anything had been in front of me my choices would have been: a) swerve to the right into parked cars b) swerve left into oncoming traffic or c) run into or hit whatever was in front of me. None of those would have been acceptable options and all could have potentially injured or killed occupants within the vehicle not to mention the potential to have injured or killed any other parties involved in a collision. I am frankly amazed that a brake system defect of this nature was not fully repaired and or replaced using a non-defective design and parts. I view any application of a aerosol surface treatment as temporary & superficial at best. It's only a matter of time for the brakes to fail on every 2005-2009 Subaru that has this defect. The risks to vehicle occupants and any other individuals involved in potential accidents are simply too high. Vehicle is currently at ira Subaru in danvers massachusetts and has been inspected by them confirming the problem with photo documentation. There was no other prior warning before the sudden complete brake system failure. It is unclear if the vehicle or component has been inspected by the manufacturer. No other party has inspected the vehicle. Vehicle is available for inspection upon request. Mileage: 77,884k.

Puddle of brake fluid under car no brakes after looking at it 4way joint connector at rear of car is leaking . Online says recall was done but specifications for the repair are ludacris to spray wax over corrosion ! the lines are already damaged and that would just seal the corrosion in and continue to deteriorate! that recall in itself is a safety hazard and needs to be reevaluated!.

The contact owns a 2005 Subaru Outback. The contact stated that after starting the vehicle, the brake warning light remained illuminated and the brake pedal extended to the floor while depressed. Upon inspection, the contact discovered brake fluid had leaked from the rear passenger’s side wheel area. Further inspection revealed rusting and corrosion of the brake lines. The cause of the failure was not yet determined. The local dealer and manufacturer were notified of the failure. The contact was informed that the vehicle was not included in the NHTSA campaign number: 13v110000 (service brakes, hydraulic). The failure mileage was 150,000.

I was driving home from work on the highway when I pressed the brake pedal as normal to slow down and the pedal went soft and I had no brakes. I was able to make it home using the emergency brake to stop. Upon inspection the lines were leaking from the same place repaired in recall wqk47, NHTSA campaign 14v311000. Visual inspection could confirm that the initial recall wqk47 repair completely failed causing serious danger to my life. I researched complaints about wqk47 recall and came to the conclusion that I am not the only Subaru owner with this serious life threatening issue. I called my dealership and even spoke with corporate Subaru and both said since recall was performed once repair/replacement will cost me. I cannot fathom why, if the first recall repair failed resulting in a life threatening situation, Subaru wouldn't want to immediately fix the problem and ensure all their customers who had this recall performed are still safe and functioning to proper standards.

I have a 2005 Subaru Outback that had a recall for break line rusting. Recall #wqk-47. The breaks no longer work do to being completely rusted out. The dealer tells me the repair is impossible to complete and therefore the car is inoperable. The dealer and corporate Subaru claim that they have no obligation to repair, replace or reimburse for this car. I believe the rusted breaks are covered by the recall and the car is inoperable solely because of the breaks. Is Subaru legally obligated to correct this issue or not?.

The contact owns a 2005 Subaru Outback. While the vehicle was stopped at a light, the brake pedal was depressed and traveled to the floorboard. The vehicle was not diagnosed or repaired. The vehicle was serviced per NHTSA campaign number: 14v311000 (service brakes, hydraulic), but the remedy failed to repair the vehicle. The manufacturer was made aware of the failure and stated that the recall had expired. The failure mileage was approximately 192,000. The VIN was not available.

Takata recall. The contact owns a 2005 Subaru Outback. The contact received notification of NHTSA campaign numbers: 15v323000 (air bags) and 14v311000 (service brakes, hydraulic); however, the parts to do the repairs were unavailable. The contact stated that the manufacturer exceeded a reasonable amount of time for the recall repairs. The dealer (serra Subaru of traverse city, 1747 s garfield Ave, traverse city, mi) was contacted and confirmed that the parts were not available for the recall remedies. The manufacturer was notified and was not able to confirm when the parts were to become available. The contact had not experienced a failure. Parts distribution disconnect.

On December 18, 2014 the day was clear; there had been no rain or snow that week. The pavement was dry. At the point of the issue I was in stop and go traffic, thus had used my brakes at an average of 12-18 times since I had left the house that morning. Traffic was maybe moving at 20-25 miles an hour, stop and go. At one point I went to apply my brakes at a normal pressure and they started to pulse in the ¿anti-lock� fashion. The pulses were exceptionally long, between braking (pulsing), nothing like I had ever experience before with this car or any other vehicle. However I kept my foot applied to the brake and did not try to pulse it myself. Before I was able to get the car stopped it hit the car in front of me. I had about 1 and â½+ car lengths between us, again only rolling and absolutely could not get the car stopped. The collision was not hard enough to deploy the airbag on either cars. The 2012 Ford escape in front had nearly no damage to the rear bumper, however due to the placement of the Ford¿s bumper to my grill, my repairs were $5,534. 67. My fear is it happening again. Due to the make of the car my insurance company can't access the electronic information on the day of the accident. Thus they will not be part of my complaint that I have filed with Subaru of America, filed 3/24/14. I done research on the subrau's abs system. I found that people have been disconecting their abs due to this issue. Including finding youtube videos on how to do it. The issue is obvious if this is what people feel safer with than the Subaru factory abs system. Subaru's claim department has no interest in investigating it without my insurance being part of the claim, even thought I am a customer of their product that is defective. Obviously this is not a ¿customers� claims department. Who will handle my claim if the next incident I am severely injured or worse yet?.