general problems of the 2008 Toyota Tundra

The 2016 Toyota frame rust settlement (burns v. Toyota motor sales, u. S. A. , inc. ): this $3. 4 billion class action directly addresses premature corrosion in 2007–2008 Tundras (and similar models). It claims Toyota “knowingly failed to apply adequate rust protection,” leading to frame perforation despite later treatments like hof. The settlement’s “recurrent perforation” clause applies even after hof. My rusted-through fuel tank strap and holes in the rear cross member qualify. Hof ro# xxx. Claim #xxx my 2008 Tundra sr5 trd was treated with hof in Nov 2017. In November 2025 my mechanic told me the gas tank was falling out as the straps that hold the tank in place were completely rotted out. And rust perforation was on the rear cross member. He instructed me to get a safety inspection at a Toyota dealership to document the rust. Toyota of waldorf didn’t even schedule a appt, they told me to call the brand engagement center and that there was no possibility of repair because Toyota had no frames. Brand engagement refused to provide any guidance. I scheduled an inspection at koons Toyota of annapolis, which it failed inspection with multiple >10mm frame holes and a rusted-through tank strap (held by bungee). They deemed it unsafe to operate and unrepairable. They kept leaving out the information about the rust or the holes until they realized I was not leaving until they documented it properly. I have 3 versions. Despite zh7 expiration, this is a post-hof recurrence and safety hazard. I requested goodwill repurchase at 1. 5x kbb (~$12k) under the settlement’s intent. The brand engagement center had me call them and [xxx] ” announced she was my case manager, then almost as quickly announced it was going to “internal dept” for repurchase review, that she would no longer be my case manager, and that they would get back to me in 60 days. I said the average is 2-4 weeks, not months and that I expected a response in 3-7 days. Information redacted pursuant to the freedom of information act (foia), 5 u. S. C.

Standard vehicle components failed. My 2008 Tundra [VIN [xxx] ] was inspected in Nov 2017 under hof/wep, passed with crc applied, but now has a 2-finger-wide perforation in the frame and rusted through the gas tank support—a clear safety defect in a salt state like maryland. The undercoating failed prematurely; I need goodwill frame replacement or buyback per the $3. 4b settlement’s spirit. ” (reference the 2017 class action, case no. 3:14-cv-03538). Toyota brand engagement center has refused my request for repair or replacement or buy back. They also refused to provide written refusal. They admitted to recording the conversation, but refused my request for a copy or to record the call myself. There is literally no rust on any other portion of my truck as it is garage kept. Information redacted pursuant to the freedom of information act (foia), 5 u. S. C. 552(b)(6).

I was washing my truck October,1,2023 and while spraying the underside with water I noticed the fuel tank hanging extremely low from the back while further inspection I observed the rear fuel tank strap had rusted off and the tank was hanging by the front strap which is very corroded along with all inner structure and frame rails which is rusted corroded and completely rotted out. This truck has been very well maintained and has only 104354 miles on it.

Took my truck in for maintenance and a bracket was hanging down. Dealer brought me back and showed me corrosion of mid framing and that gas bracket had rotted off. Gave me a proposal of over $7000 to repair. I had said to them that I had the frame frame coated during the recall,and why weren't the cross members sprayed at that time. They replied Toyota said it was not needed. Did some research yesterday and found that rusting cross members was a problem,and that tire holders,and gas brackets were a problem. Called Toyota and they explained to me that certain VIN #'s were covered but that mine was not. I asked them why my truck with the same issues was not covered? was told corporate policy. Do I have any rights in this issue. My cell # is 2679074751, my e-mail is nick852@aol. Com.

The air injection pumps went out. Vehicle could not get out of limp mode, was very dangerous as I couldnt get up to speed while merging onto traffic. Had to put hazards on and drive vehicle home under 25mph. Vehicles were going around me. Vehicle is scheduled to be looked at by a dealer, but still recommend this be a safety issue!!.

Toyota acknowledges a problem with their air intake valve and has extended the warranty period. The warranty is too short, too little miles, and only covers the repair one time. My vehicle is experiencing this problem for the 3rd time even though they claim that their repair fixed the problem the first time, and claims no one else experienced the problem a second time (although I have).

Check engine light is lit. A few weeks later vsc light started blinking.

This compliant compliments the current Toyota recall that is related to the sticking accelerator pedal. The pedal in my 2008 Toyota Tundra does not get stuck at acceleration point but is sticky during the acceleration process. This is a physical issue that is related to the pedal movement as depressed from a stopped position. This has occurred at least 70 % of the time since I owned the vehicle (purchased new). Since my vehicle is on the recall list I feel that this is a situation that should also be investigated. My spouse has notice the difference in acceleration varying from a very smooth take off to a harsh jerk and that launches the vehicle forward.