Tire Tread/belt problems of the 2000 Ford Expedition - part 1

While traveling south on I-95 at approx 65 mph, the passenger right rear tire failed. It appears that the failure mode was tread separation/detachment. The tread ended up wrapped around the rear axle. At the moment of the failure the 2000 Ford Expedition torqued hard to the right, but control was maintained. Further information on this incident is that the failed tire was a replacement for a recall (NHTSA campaign id number: 02t012000) by continental tire CO. And replaced by a Ford dealership. The failure of the replacement tire fits the exact description as stated in the NHTSA investigation report.

Own a 2000 Ford Expedition (original owner) and had tires replaced as part of recall of 2002. Tires were replaced at local Ford dealership with general grabber aw p275/60/r17. Recently I noticed "steering" and "bumpy" ride, so I took vehicle to get it checked out. Mechanic showed how one tire had "bowed out" feature and explained that this was a "tread separation" and needed to be replaced. Remembering prior recall for same reason, was concerned this was a possible manufacturer defect. Researched on internet and found # to call at continental to report. Called and spoke with "bill" who recorded my concerns and created a file #22239. Told me a could go to national tire and battery and have it checked out. Went to ntb and the technician examined the tire and said he could not prorate the warranty. I explained that I just wanted to inform the manufacturer of the possibility of a manufacturer defect in case there were other complaints for the same type of tire. He said that with the apparent age of the tire it could have been caused by a bump that had caused the weakness. My expectations for a tire is for the tread to wear out before any other breakdown.

2000 Expedition tire tread separated.

'recall campaign' tread separation. Consumer contacted the dealer who sold him the tires. Found that there was a recall for continental, p275/60r17 0051612. While driving the consumer noticed a vibration. The vehicle was taken to have an alignment when he was informed that the passenger side front tire tread had separated and that a second tire was having a similar problem. The consumer replaced the tires and later found out that they were recalled. The consumer request reimbursement for the faulty tires.

While driving 65 mph consumer heard a loud knocking noise coming from the rear. Consumer pulled over, and noticed that the passenger's rear tire tread was separating. Vehicle was taken to the dealer for inspection, and mechanic determined that the tire needed to be replaced.

I had a tire separation while driving 70 mph. Please see tire recall campaign number below. Tire recall campaign id number 02t012000 I have 5 of these tire on my 2000 Expedition. According to Ford customer relationship, my VIN was not a part of a recall. The tires, however were. Dot numbers were verified with continental. There were 596610 units affected, yet Ford only is showing approximately 500 vehicles with only 300 actualy qualifying. This seems like a game to me as thes five tire were originally on my vehicle.

While driving at low speeds front right tire blewout, causing tread separation. Consumer managed to pull over. Had taken vehicle to dealership, but the problem had not been resolved. Tire size 275/60r16.

While traveling on the highway and without prior warning all four tires has tread separation. Continental, p275/60r17.

The consumer replaced the original continental general grabber aw tires prior to the recall, however in 09/02 he received a recall letter from the manufacturer regarding the tires. Consumer requested reimbursement, however continental denied the claim, they stated the deadline had passed.

While driving and without prior warning the passenger side tire tread separated from the vehicle.

Consumer requested reimbursement regarding the tires, however the claim was denied.

The consumer was denied reimbursement for faulty tires because the purchase date of the tires did not fall with the purchased date allowed (continental tires).

Continental tire reimbursement. The consumer experienced tread separation on the right rear tire. The conumer purchased his tires prior to the recall.

Nar 1/29/2003. The consumer replaced all 4 tires prior to the recall due to poor tread wear. The consumer submitted all the necessary paperwork and was told he would be reimbursed, however there has been no refund. 8jb.

Dotadt044t369 p27560r17 general grabbers, consumer states while traveling at 60 mph the right rear tire tread seperated. Consumer was able to keep control of vehicle. Please provide any further information.

While in motion the right rear tire blew. The tread separated from the tire, consumer discoverd prior to the incident that the tires were on recall, however when he contacted continental he was told a system had not been set up as of yet to handle recall situations. (continental tires p275/60r17, dot# adt044t369).

Tread separation of left rear tire and rollover on interstate 75 in collier county, florida.

While driving, rear driver's side tire had tread separation. Afterwards, front passenger side tire had the same problem. Original equipment, 22ooo miles, continental general american 275/60r17, mounted on a 2000, Ford, Expedition. *akthe dot number right front tire and the left rear, dot adt 044t369.

The left rear tire experienced tread separation while the consumer was driving causing damage to the vehicle. Then a right rear tire developed a bulge. (continental tire 275/60r17 and dot # adto 44t 1600).

Four 1' cracks around perimeter of sidewall near tread; belts broken inside tread; still has greater than 3/32" tread; tire has always been properly inflated. Belts should not break in tires. What is cause ? ? ?.

At 70mph tire tread started to separate and could have caused an accident. Cause unknown. Dealer notified. Size/dot# unknown, please provide.

All four vehicle tires had separated tread, one major, the vehicle was not driven over 70 mph highway and was not taken off-road at any time. Tires were replaced by discount tire 1300 e expressway 83 mcallen TX 956-668-9789 on 6-18-2002. Tires were kept inflated properly, alignment maintained with normal tread wear on tires. One tire had been repaired for a flat. General tire was contacted and demonstrated no concern over four tire treads seperating on one vehicle under normal use on 6-19-2002. I believe general has a severe safety issue with this tire that needs immediate attention.

Consumer states that the right rear tire experienced tread separation, consumer is requesting that all four tires be replaced, general grabbers aw, 275/60r17.

I have a 2000 Ford Expedition. Last June, just after having the car serviced, I noticed my general grabber tires delaminating and coming apart. I immediately called my local Ford dealer and was told there was no recall on the tires, but to save any receipts when I purchase new tires in the event there is a recall. I replaced the tires and saved the recept. I received a recall notice from Ford later in the year. When I called them they said to bring the vehicle in. I explained that I had replaced the tires. I was told my claim was with continental tire, not Ford, and that continental would be contacting me. They never did contact me and I finally had the opportunity to call continental tire with a phone no. Given to me by Ford. Continental tire now says that the recall is over and there is no way to recoup my expenses. I need your help. In my case no one was injured because I made a vehicle inspection and had the tires replaced (before the recall was made). If there had been a death, we'd be in court right now, but because there wasn't I'm being penalized for the cost of the tires and being vigilant.

My wife was driving our 2000 Expedition on the freeway at 60mph when the tread separated on the right rear tire, causing a blow out and an accident, almost causing a catastrophic rollover. I am fortunate she was not killed. What irritates me the most is general tire has a reputation for this problem, especially here in arizona, and the consumer has no idea. These tires were not worn and were properly inflated, and the only legal recourse I would have against general tire would have been if my wife and infant child had been seriously injured. I am incensed about this as the only reason general will get away with this is due to the fact my wife's driving skills saved her life. My opinion is general and Ford continue to deceive the public about the safety of the product they are putting on the road, and there is no repercussion for their negligence.

The left rear tire experienced tread separation.

Tread belt separation/came off, causing loss of control and roll over accident w/injury.

Tread belt separation, causing loss of control and roll over accident w/injury.

The consumer requested reimbursement for the tire(s). Mr the consumer didn't receive the letter of reimbursement until after the deadline. Continental tire(s) scc.

While traveling about 50-70 mph on highway there was a loud noise coming from wheel. Consumer was able to pull over to the shoulders, general grabber aw adto44t0200 right tire separated. Another day, the left front tire separted. 3 weeks later another tire separated.

While traveling about 55mph on highway consumer heard a noise. He was able to pull over to shoulder. Rear passenger tire tread separated from tire. Tire goodyear, grabber aw, general,p275/60r17.

Continental grabber aw size 275-60r17 dot#: adt044t2600 original equipment. Consumer states that while driving the tread on the left rear tire separated causing the vehicle to sway from side to side resulting in damage to the vehicle. The dealer has been notified. Please provide additional information. Nlm.

General, grabber aw, p275/60r17, dot unknown, original equipment on a 2000, Ford Expedition with 19700 miles. While driving 70 mph drivers rear tire experienced tread separation, causing damage to vehicle. Dot# adt044t2000 consumer stated he was able to control the vehicle.

While driving 65-70 mph and without warning, general tire size 275/60r17, dot adt044t2300, right rear and left rear tread separated. Consumer has notified dealer and manufacturer.

The center tread of the left rear tire came off while the consumer was traveling. The tread damaged the back quarter panel and the rear of the vehcile. The consumer was seeking reimbursement for the cost of the tire and repaire to the vehicle. Tire was gereral p275/60r17.