Other Fuel System Problems of Nissan Juke - part 2

2012 Nissan Juke has a very strong gasoline odor whenever the car is started. The odor dissipates while on the road, but if the vehicle is parked for any length of time and then re-started, the odor returns. This began a few months ago, but was very intermittent initially. Now it is very frequent.

See all problems of the 2012 Nissan Juke 🔎.

Tl the contact owns a 2012 Nissan Juke. While operating the vehicle, the odor of fuel was present inside the cabin. The vehicle was taken to dar cars Nissan of rockville (15911 indianola dr, rockville, MD) where it was diagnosed that the fuel pressure sensor was faulty. The vehicle was not repaired. The manufacturer was notified of the failure, but no assistance was offered. The failure mileage was 98,000.

Tl the contact owns a 2011 Nissan Juke. The contact smelled fuel and noticed fuel leaking from under the middle of the vehicle. The contact stated that the vehicle exhibited the same symptoms as listed in NHTSA campaign number: 12v690000 (fuel system, gasoline). The vehicle was not taken to a dealer to be diagnosed or repaired. The manufacturer was notified of the failure. The failure mileage was approximately 90,000.

See all problems of the 2011 Nissan Juke 🔎.

I have a Nissan Juke 2011 and had to replace the fuel pressure sensor because it was leaking gas. I feared for my safety and the safety of passengers. Nissan refused to repair my vehicle because my car was not apart of the VIN number selected for recall. I had the same problem and could have been killed. They should be responsible. Grainger Nissan, 1550 chatham parkway, savannah, GA, 912-358-5858 repaired my vehicle. Nissan need to refund my money.

Note long ago. , my car was taken for an oil change. Afterwards oil began to appear on the ground. I took the vehicle back. I was charged $163. Oo for diagnostic but never given a invoice address the issue except to say check engine light was on with code po 1113. Po11c and po 171. They replaced something but only gave a receipt for a diagnosis. Then I received a month later, a notice about an evaporative emisson vapor vent tube. I believe I should receive the money returned for the diagnosis because it was the error of the dealership and I need a copy of the work performed for my records; which was not provided except what was mentioned above.

Dose not even get close to the est gas milage should 25city 30 highway it really geys 18 city and 22/23 highway.

The contact owns a 2011 Nissan Juke. The contact smelled strong fuel fumes inside the vehicle. The vehicle was taken to executive Jeep (900 universal dr n suite b, north haven, CT 06473 (203) 239-5213) where it was diagnosed that the fuel pressure sensor needed to be replaced, and that the vehicle was excluded from NHTSA campaign number: 12v069000 (fuel system, gasoline). The manufacturer was notified of the failure. The approximate failure mileage was 47,000.

The contact's wife owns a 2011 Nissan Juke. On several occasions, the vehicle smelled of fuel. The contact stated that the fuel odor became strong and spread throughout the vehicle. There were no warning indicators illuminated. The vehicle was taken to the dealer where it was diagnosed that the fuel pressure switch needed to be replaced. The vehicle was repaired but the issue recurred. The contact referenced NHTSA campaign number: 12v069000 (fuel system, gasoline). The manufacturer was not made aware of the failure. The failure mileage was 51,000.

Vehicle experienced odor of raw gasoline in ventilation system to passenger compartment while vehicle was on, particularly after startup. This odor could also be smelled on the exterior of the vehicle. Vehicle was taken to dealer and it was determined that a fuel pressure sensor leak was the problem and performed repair. After the vehicle was repaired, a web search showed that this same problem had a safety recall on this same vehicle (12v-069), but this vehicle just "out of the VIN range" for the recall. The safety recall should be extended and owners advised of this safety issue that may occur, potentially causing a fire.

Increasing odor of fuel in the cabin. First noticed when the weather became cool. No obvious cause or engine performance issues noted. No leaks noted around the vehicle. Nissan dealership quoting $450 minimum to diagnose and needs the car for 2 days in order to find the problem.

The contact owns a 2011 Nissan Juke. The contact stated that the fuel system was leaking. The vehicle was taken to the dealer where it was diagnosed that the fuel pressure sensor needed to be replaced. The vehicle was repaired. The manufacturer was notified of the failure. The contact was informed that the vehicle was not included in NHTSA campaign number: 12v069000 (fuel system, gasoline). The contact stated that the vehicle experienced the same failure listed in the recall. The failure mileage was 90,000.

There's been a fuel leak from the fuel rail sensor after the recall was performed. It is concerning that Nissan would not cover the cost of this leak even though they say they performed the recall and repair the problem they did not replace the fuel sensor gasket when doing so which I believe caused the current leak. This seems to be a reoccurring problem and feel Nissan should take care of such a risky fuel problem just above the starter that could cause a spark.

Several times my 2011 Nissan Juke sl awd has lost significant power. Every time it happened speed dropped to approx. 20mph. These were also on interstate drives where quick deceleration is very dangerous. It is my understanding that Nissan did recall Jukes with the same issue but my vehicle was not included. I have read many complaints on, the internet, about the same problem and those people were not included in the recall. I would appreciate consideration of investigation into possible extension of the recall. Thank you.

My 2011 Nissan Juke has been sitting in austin TX. Waiting to be towed from clay cooley Nissan. The motor has been rendered unfixable due to sludge from the engine. The Juke was recalled for a timing chain replacement on Dec 16,2015 at mileage 96,133. In their report it states that due to the timing chain having been stretched and rubbed into the side of the engine and timing cover;aluminum shavings from the block soaked in oil from the leak the chain created, is the reason the engine was malfunctioning this time around. It was only "patched and not fixed" states the mechanic from ed hicks Nissan. I purchased the extended warranty for 100,000 miles and at 108,000 miles the engine blows and Nissan does not want to claim responsibility for the damage. I took care of my car since it is all I have and believed in Nissan mechanics when they said it was fixed and ready. Not having my vehicle has caused so much stress in my life. It has been since 8/17/2016 that I have been dealing with Nissan corporate and there consumer affairs department. It seems at this time they do not want to communicate with me anymore. Thank you for your time and hope to hear from you soon.

2 turbos out and sitting waiting on a 3 lost all power on interstate.

See all problems of the 2013 Nissan Juke 🔎.

Sent a warranty notification that a clog may develop in the evaporated emission vapor vent tube. Nissan stated that if this happens that the software cannot accurately pinpoint this issue. What Nissan failed to state is what can happen in the event that the evaporated emission vapor vent fails!.

See all problems of the 2016 Nissan Juke 🔎.

See attached letter - fuel leak - previous recall.

I am very angry. . I wish I had done my research before purchasing my 2013 Nissan Juke. The extended warranty is a joke. My son and I were nearly in an accident on the highway due to the faulty turbo. The car began to decelerate and went from 65mph to below 20mph. Nissan is declining the claim. I even submitted proof of oil changes and etc. . . I have registered a complaint to Nissan since this has happened, I did research. Juke's from 2011-2014 have turbo issues. How can all these people be wrong?? the 1st time, happened in March. I took it in to the shop and they 'repaired" the car. Then it happened again. This time they are saying it is the turbo. . I registered a complaint with Nissan case #22368872 they said they will call me tomorrow. I need this resolved. It is very scary and dangerous.

The contact owns a 2013 Nissan Juke. The contact stated that the vehicle leaked fuel vapor inside the vehicle through the vents and leaked fuel onto the ground on numerous occasions. The vehicle was taken to be repaired under a recall, but the issue recurred. The manufacturer was made aware of the issue. The VIN, NHTSA campaign number, and failure mileage were unknown.

There were 2 recalls on my car and I was never notified of the problems the,fuel pressure sensor and the Juke air inlet tube. I was driving down the highway , and I just had a larger problem with my power stirring, I was in the high speed lane traveling 70 miles an hour and my power stirring let go. I called Nissan of America to see if there were any re-calls on my car and I was told no, my car has been tied up at tasca Nissan in dartmouth, MA for more than 1 week, I was told the part would be in Feb 22. . Nissan offered to pay for the part which cost 1,908. 29. But I have to pay for the shipping cost which cost 120. 00dollars and I have to pay for the labor cost which is 480. 00 dollars I am frustrated and angry, know one seems to care that I could of got killed or seriously injured in this car. Now I find out there were 2 re-calls on this car and I was never notified! I service my car regularly, I just spent over 800. 00 dollars for new tires, wiper blades, oil change replacement of a tire sensor and I am renting a car at the present. . I noticed in my research that the rogue is being called back for power stirring problems, what the hell is going on? as far as the power stirring repair my warranty ran out, I feel this was a defect in the power stirring, but I am expected to pay for the repairs. I do have a case # it is 21635903 and I spoke with a man named jim his # is 615-725-7254. Tasca of dartmouth have been wonderful, they even tried to get the cost to me lowered but it fell on deaf ears. , they also told me they would not let me drive my car because it was to dangerous for me to drive, at least they cared about my safety, thank god. I am a 63y/o female who works hard for my money, but I guess I am going to have to eat this bill!.

Extend the fuel pressure sensor recall. . . . I have a strong gasoline smell in cabin. While car is [parked or driving] and engine is running, the air conditioning and/or heat is on a extremely strong gasoline smell fills the cabin and can suffocate you and your passengers. Worst when air is coming in from outside and not reusing the cabins air. Mechanic couldn't find any leaks and told me about a recall on Jukes. My Juke is not apart of the recall and is having the same problems as the fuel pressure sensor recall because of improper tightening. There are many complaints on forums online with people not being on the recall that have this problem.

Strong gas odor in car coming from air vents fuel pressure regulator was re torque under a recall. No visible leak gas odor under the hood also. Strong odor under hood. Nissan will not cover they say they already repaired part alone is$ 800. 00 and wont even look at it with out charging me had it independently verified bye a qualified mechanic.

Noticed gasoline smell in car; smell got progressively worse. Fuel found leaking under car. Car taken to mechanic. Mechanic investigated leak and Nissan Juke recalls. Mechanic found fuel leak under intake -see recall 14v683. Nissan says not covered by recall. Intake removed and found the fuel pressure sensor not adequately torqued. Touched with wrench an spewed fuel. Then turned off by hand. Matches the symptoms of the recall exactly.

Strong fuel smell inside cabin and outside of car every time car is running, along with significantly reduced mpg (~18 city - 20hwy).

My Juke has been dececlerating while in highway doing 75mph and has been jumping gears which all had been a problem since purchasing the car and was not found until today that the entire valve body control in the transmission which controls cvt needs to be replaced. This is a safety issue that should have been recalled as my car is 4 years old and should not have this problem with less then 130000 miles. I had extended warranty until 120000 and continuously reported this to dealership during each service which they never could diagnose and found today telling me the cost to fix it and replace and resolve these issues is over $1800. My Juke has had several problems on top of these issues all to do with safety over the years and several similar complaints have been reported and not recalled by Nissan which is unacceptable, unsafe, and a legal issue which I will possibly be pursuing due to the several accidents I have also experienced throughout the years which these problems were also present and not resolved due to no safety recalls being on file with Nissan. My car has also shut off twice while in traffic and stopped accelerating on highway several times almost causing accidents. Other owners have reported these same issues and no recalls have been done although the Juke also stopped being made in 2015 right after I purchased mine brand new. I have kept up on all routine maintenance throughout the years and fees that these issues are unacceptable, unsafe, and all which I will be reporting to better business heresy, Nissan, and exploring legal case if Nissan does not look into recalling these several safety hazards on the 2014-2015 Jukes, including my Juke. I want a resolution and not to have to pay for these safety concerns that should have been recalled and resolved and still have not been to this date of today where issue was identified, see attachment.

See all problems of the 2014 Nissan Juke 🔎.

The contact owns a 2011 Nissan Juke. The contact stated that while attempting to start the vehicle, the contact noticed fumes and a strong fuel odor emitting from the air vents. The vehicle was taken to a dealer. The technician diagnosed that the fuel pressure sensor needed to be replaced. The vehicle was not repaired. The failure recurred on numerous occasions. The manufacturer was notified of the failure and stated that the vehicle was previously repaired under NHTSA campaign number: 12v069000 (fuel system, gasoline). The failure mileage was 54,000.

On wed, January 21, 2015, I arrived home around 7pm and went inside. I was not in the house 5 minutes when I heard a massive explosion in my driveway. I then saw a bright orange glow outside my window, which was my car engulfed in flames. The fire dept suppressed the fire and that night I called my insurance company to report the incident. The car (a lease), was incinerated and deemed a total loss by the insurance adjuster. My insurance paid off the car to the leasing company. When I researched this issue, I saw a letter the NHTSA sent to Nissan north America regarding a loose fuel pressure sensor in my 2013 Juke and prompted them to issue recalls. That letter was dated Dec 8, 2014. My car was, in fact, on the recall list and I finally got my letter one week after the incident. Nissan was very slow to inform their customers of a very serious and potentially fatal issue. Nissan corporate did an investigation on my car and focused on the fuel pressure sensor. After 1 month of waiting for them to contact me, they called me wed, February 25th, 2015 telling me that the fuel pressure sensor was not the issue, however they are not able to pinpoint what exactly did happen. They admit that no external factors could have contributed to this fire and that it was, indeed, an issue with the car. The only thing they said they could do for me was offer a discount on a new Nissan, however I told them I would never drive another Nissan, especially since they aren't sure what made the car blow up. I know in my heart the fuel pressure sensor was to blame. Why else would my car be engulfed in an obvious fuel fire in my driveway. I find it horrible that they are not accepting responsibility for their faulty engineering. You may want to look more into this since they "don't know what caused it". Also, they said they could not release the report to me as it's Nissan's property.

I had noticed fuel smell inside cabin for some time. After some research, I realized this was related to a recall that apparently had already been done to the vehicle. I dropped the car at local dealer and after service department denied smelling fuel or detecting any leaks, many phone calls and another visit to show them it really smelled like fuel inside, it was eventually fixed free of charge even though warranty was expired. The invoice sheet states fuel pressure sensor was loose and was re-tightened per bulletin.

Tl-the contact owns a 2012 Nissan Juke. The contact stated that there was an odor of fuel coming from the inside of the vehicle. The vehicle was taken to a dealer where it was diagnosed that the fuel pressure sensor needed to be replaced. The vehicle was not repaired. The manufacturer was notified of the failure and stated that the VIN was not included in NHTSA campaign number: v14v683000 (fuel system, gasoline). The failure mileage was 46,000. Djr.

Starting approximately 12/1/2014, we began to notice a strong smell of gasoline in the passenger compartment within minutes of starting the vehicle. The smell would diminish as the car warmed up, but would not go away completely. We contacted the local dealer service dept. , and were told there was a recall on this issue. Upon taking the car in to be serviced, they confirmed the fuel leak was from the fuel rail pressure sensor, which is the precise problem which prompted the recall campaign. On further investigation, they determined the recall service (technical bulletin reference ntb12-021b) had already been performed on this VIN, and Nissan would not cover the repair at this point. Nissan's recall campaign id# is r1201, NHTSA#12v-069. It appears, at least in this case, the recall service was ineffective in correcting or preventing the fuel leak issue, making it possible that all affected vehicles may still be prone to this fuel leak problem . Nissan customer relations further stated they did not consider an engine compartment fuel leak to be a safety issue. I strongly believe an "increased risk of a fire" is a safety issue and Nissan should still be liable to correct an inherent safety vulnerability in their vehicles.

Tl the contact owns a 2012 Nissan Juke. The contact stated that the fuel indicator illuminated. The vehicle was serviced at loving Nissan (1433 s medford dr, lufkin, TX 75901, (936) 634-4488) for an unknown NHTSA campaign, but the remedy failed to repair the vehicle. The contact mentioned that the fuel warning indicator remained illuminated after the recall repair. The manufacturer was notified of the failure. The failure mileage was 111,000.

The contact owns a 2011 Nissan Juke. When the vehicle was started, the contact smelled fuel inside the vehicle without warning. The failure recurred each time the vehicle was started. The vehicle was taken to the dealer, but the failure was unable to be determined. The vehicle was not repaired. The contact stated that the VIN was not included in NHTSA campaign number: 12v069000 (fuel system, gasoline). The manufacturer was not made aware of the failure. The approximate failure mileage was 60,000.

Noticed a fuel / gas smell in cabin , especially while car was standing still with engine running.

Tl- the contact owns a 2011 Nissan Juke. The contact stated that while driving at various speeds, there was fuel odor emitted into the vehicle. The vehicle was taken to Nissan bros Nissan dealership located at 5750 mesmer Ave a, culver city, CA 90230 (310) 313-3400 where it was diagnosed that the timing chain needed to be replaced. The vehicle was not repaired. The manufacturer was contacted and made aware of the failure and did not offer further assistance. The approximate failure mileage was 94,000. A.

The contact owns a 2014 Nissan Juke. While driving approximately 10 mph, the vehicle idled at a high rate between gears one and two. The vehicle was taken to dealer, who stated that the vehicle was working up to specifications. In addition, after refueling the vehicle, a strong fuel odor emitted inside the vehicle. The vehicle was repaired under NHTSA campaign number: 14v683000 (fuel system, gasoline); however, the failure recurred. The manufacturer was made aware of the failure. The approximate failure mileage was 20.