Tire Problems of Acura TL - part 1

See attached document for complaint.

See all problems of the 2005 Acura TL 🔎.

The contact owns a 2000 Acura Tl with yokohama avid tires, size: 205/60/r16. The contact stated that while driving 50 mph, she noticed a vibration from the car. The vehicle was taken to the dealer for diagnosis where it was stated that manufacturing defect lead to a knot in the front passenger's side tire. The tire was not repaired and the manufacturer was not notified. The VIN was not available. The approximate vehicle failure mileage was 247,000 and the tire failure mileage was 400.

See all problems of the 2000 Acura TL 🔎.

Tread has separated from tire carcass on one tire, imminent on other three tires according to dealer. Suspect defective adhesive or application during manufacture of the tire.

See all problems of the 2006 Acura TL 🔎.

I have a major safety concern with my 2005 Acura Tl. In April, 2010, the Acura dealer replaced broken compliance bushings during a routine service (82,000 miles). After the service, I immediately noticed my car felt unsafe to drive and had a very rough ride. After numerous dealer visits, they replaced the rear strut assembly. None of this improved the handling or ride. At this time, the dealer stated I had the wrong tires and needed to replace them with original equipment michelin pilot mxm4 tires. I had nearly new michelin pilot sport a/s plus tires and not experienced a problem prior to the replacement of the bushings. I checked at costco, where I purchased the tires, and they indicated that michelin pilot sport plus tires were an acceptable upgrade for my vehicle. The owners manual does not mention that the Acura suspension requires tires only purchased at the dealer. On Nov. 8, 2010, during a routine service visit, the dealer noted fingernail size chunks of rubber pealing off my 2 front tires. They recommended I immediately change them since they were unsafe. Costco agreed to prorate and replace them with the dealer recommended tire. I notified the dealer of the purchase and then was told that michelin made special tires only available at the Acura dealer. Until today, the dealer never stated that michelin pilot mxm4 tires manufactured especially for Acura were the only tires that would work with the Acura suspension. I have several problems with this. Nowhere does it say you must buy replacement tires from the dealer to have a safe car. Acura should not sell a car that can be safely driven with tires only purchased from them. I am very concerned that had I not taken the car in for service, I may have had a major tire failure causing serious injury or death. I am requesting that the ntsb investigate this issue and determine if other Acura drivers are at risk due to the purchase of tires from anyone other than the Acura dealer. Updated 01/20/11.

Pulling out of my garage this morning, I noticed my car was making a clunking sound on the passenger side. It disappeared promptly as I exited the garage and pulled out onto the street, and I figured it was simply due to the chilly weather, with it being about 25f outside. About 5 miles down the freeway, I noticed the clunking sound came back, and was quite violent this time, and I started to smell burning rubber. I pulled over to the side of the road, hoping to ease my way to the nearest service station to see what was wrong; however, my car did not make it. I got out and inspected all sides, and that's when I saw that the tread separated from my front passenger side tire, and there were chunks of tire on the road. According to the dealer at the last visit two months ago, there still had been . 7 cm left of tread, and what they told me was plenty to drive on for quite some time. To correct the issue, I replaced the tire with a spare, and have an appointment to get new tires tomorrow.

See all problems of the 2003 Acura TL 🔎.

I recently purchased a dealer-certified used 2005 Acura Tl with new, dealer-installed bridgestone turanza el42 tires. In my first experience driving the vehicle in rain, I nearly lost control of the vehicle at 60 mph when I hit a shallow standing water (~1" deep) in the roadway. Being a front-drive vehicle, I was very surprised to feel the front tires distinctly hydroplane and cause me to almost lose control of my vehicle. These tires only have 2,000 miles on them and I find their lack of hydroplaning resistance to be well below normal expectations and therefore distinctly dangerous.

- the contact owns a 2005 Acura, and complained about the tires. The contact had 3 incidents with the tires that were on the vehicle at the time of purchase. During the first incident, the driver's side tire lost air due to a nail. The tire was repaired on may 6, 2006. In July the contact noticed the same tire was losing air, and was repaired on December 1, 2006. Also, the contact had the tires rotated, aligned, and the tire pressure checked. On December 31, 2006, the contact was driving and noticed the vehicle was slowing down . She then accelerated, but the vehicle continued to slow down. Suddenly a cloud of smoke appeared on the front passenger's side . The police escorted the contact to a safe location. The tire was burnt, and the rim was damaged. On January 2, 2007 all 4 tires were replaced at the dealer. The contact felt that Acura should not use this type of defective tire.

Complete failure of right rear tire purchased new in a set of four approximately one month before (November 16, 2006). Tire failure occurred while driving at approximately 70 mph. Failed tire flew off rim (wheel) causing car to be nearly uncontrollable and causing damage to the front rim (wheel) and tire on the right side of the car.

See all problems of the 2004 Acura TL 🔎.

Premature tire tread wear.

This complaint refers to the original equipment tires (bridgestone el-42, 235/45-17 93w ) supplied on the 2004 Acura Tl with 6 speed manual transmission. After just a short time I have found this tire to be entirely unsafe and unsuitable to this vehicle. I believe that both Acura and bridgestone should be held responsible for replacing this tire on all existing vehicles. This tire exhibits unsafe characteristics in wet weather, with noticeable drift and hydroplaning in any amount of standing water, even as little as 1/16 inch. In heavy rains, even with no standing water present, the tire seems incapable of dispersing water as quickly as it falls, again leading to vehicle instability. From a ride quality point of view the tire is also unsatisfactory in that it flat spots every morning, especially in cool weather but even in warmer weather as well, leading to vibrations in the initial miles of any drive. It is also especially harsh over roadway expansion joints, and is so loud on concrete pavements that it poses a safety hazard due to driver fatigue induced by the continuous noise. I also understand that there may be an issue regarding the rating as an "all season tire" with many owners reporting that this tire is virtually useless in any kind of snow conditions.

Bridgestone turanza e42 oem tire on 2004 Acura Tl have flat spotting issues and were worn out after 15,000 miles. Very poor traction in rain and snow for an all season touring tire. Acura and bridgestone should recall and replace these tires.

My 2004 Acura 3. 2 Tl uses bridgestone turanza el42 tires (235/45r17), w speed-rated. The el 42 tires had a so called "flat spot" problem and they were worn out only at 15,500 mile. There has been many complaints about this type of tires on the internet. Many of them mentioned that "flat spot" problem could become a safety issue.

I purchased a new 2005 Acura Tl in August 2005. My car is a non-navigation 6 speed manual transmission model delivered with bridgestone el42 tires. The first time I drove the vehicle in the rain, I noticed that even at low speeds on wet roads, the tires do not have any traction at all. On ramps at 20 mph the front tires loose grip. As of today, the weather is getting colder and the tires are flat spotting on top of that. These tires are all season rated and delivered on a $35,000 vehicle. They are absolutely unsafe in anything but dry weather, but are rates all season. I fear for my safety on the highway at freeway speeds and even more fear the first day of snow. Acura has so far refused to do anything and referred me to the tire manufacturer. They do deliver other Tl models with michelin tires that are rated by customer much much higher. While the el42 tires present a big problem from wet weather traction, over flat spotting to premature wear, Acura has chosen not to do anything about it yet. How shameful for otherwise such a great car, putting on tires that will land them a lawsuit if anything happens at all! it it their choice to put these tires on some of their cars, so their responsibility to fix the problem!!.

I have called the Acura customer service number and did not get through with anyone. My 2004 Acura Tl has a consistent vibration problem when the car is running between 50 and 60 mph. The vibration seems to come from the front of the car. I reported the problem to the Acura dealer and they have assured me the problem was with the tires. I also had a second opinion from another dealership whom also assured me the problem are the tires. I find that this is a very common issue with the bridgestone tires, and I feel that these tires are unsafe and Acura/bridegstone should recall and replace these tires. The consumers should not have to pay to replace these tires. My car has about 10,000 miles and this is a real problem for consumers who just purchased a brand new vehicle to have to worry about tires, which I feel may have a design or manufacturing defect causing a vibration in the car. This may lead to accidents and I also know that there are many other 2004 Acura owners complaining about the same problem. I hope this problem gets resolved as soon as possible.

The rear tires on a 2005 Acura Tl lost all thir tread with only 8000 mile on the odometer. The tires supplied by the vehicle manufacturer were bridgestone turanza el42 p235 45 r17 with a tread wear rating of 260. The tires were rotated by the Acura dealer at 4000 miles and no unusual ware was reported. This totally unexpected rapid wear resulted in the vehicle becoming unstable on wet pavement. This could have resulted in loss of control. The extreme tire wear problem was found when investigating the vehicle stability problem. These tires are either totally unsuitable for this vehicle and should have never been provided by the manufacturer or the rear suspension of the vehicle was not properly designed for the vehicle. All Acura Tl cars with these tires should be recalled and the tires replaced. It should be noted that recent vehicles are being shipped with michelin pilot hx mxm4 tires so the manufacturer appears to be aware of the problem.

There were original tires on the vehicle. The rear passenger tire was smoking and went completely flat while driving at 60-65 mph. It damaged the rim. The dealership gave the consumer the number for the manufacturer and they told her that the tire was tested and it was not defective. This was caused by a nail puncture.

Oem tires (bridgestone el42) completely worn out after 10,000 miles. From very beginning, "all season" tires would routinely hydroplane at speeds as low as 40mph and were unusable in the snow.

I'm very upset about the oem tires on my 2005 Acura. I've had it since March of this year and complained from the beginning that the tires should be replaced because of the flat spotting and vibration. I complained to Acura in California who had my car in twice so far. They acknowledge the vibration in many of their Tls but won't replace the tires. They placed a small dampening rubber by the engine mount but it's still very obvious and very annoying. We as citizens come to you as a last resort many times to voice our concerns over safety issues. I cannot believe that with all the numerous complaints for over two years now about these tires failing, vibrating and very premature wear from new car buyers all over the country, nobody there is doing there job! Acura and bridgestone should be made to replace all bridgestone turanza el42 tires immediately.

: the contact stated the original rear tires were replaced at 15,000 miles due to baldness two-thirds from the outside to the inside. The tires were replaced by the dealership. The tires are bridgestone turanza p23545r17.

During light rain my 2004 Acura Tl with bridgestone turanza el-42 tires hydroplaned and lost control. It hit the center divider and spun and ended up on the right shoulder. The front left wheel broke off. Fortunetly my car or the broken wheel did not hit another car. There were quite a few cars on the freeway all at normal freeway speed. I was actually following my wifes 2003 Honda accord lx in the same lane at the time of the accident. I have filed a complaint with Acura (800) 382-2238 and my case # b012005-02-2300320. So far the complaint has accomplished nothing for me.

I own a 2004 Acura Tl with original equipment bridgestone el-42 tires. While the tire preformed acceptably during the summer the preformance on wet roads and particulary in snow and ice was absolutly terrible. My family and I took a 500 mile trip in michigan over the christmas holidays and I almost had to park the car and get a rental to get home. I replaced the tires 2 days after getting home. The tires had only 12k miles on therm.

Brand new Acura Tl 2004 (vibration )bridgestone teranza tires el42 flat spotting. Acura national customer service notified ,has had several complaints fail to do anything. Many users complaining see edmunds . Com new model 2005 no longer uses bridgestone changed to michelins. Dealer no help.

Due to vibration dealer dealer balanced tires on 7/21/04. Vibration did not go away. Dealer replaced all 4 tires on 8/26/04. Vibration continued.

In my opinion the manufacturer is knowingly was selling the 2004 Acura Tl with the bridgestone/firestone el-42 tires knowing that these tires had a design or manufacturing defect causing them to flat spot without warning the buyer first about the problem. Not only this is deceptive and in my opinion violates implied warrantly but it was dangerous as it forced us to drive the car at slow speeds because of the vibration in high speed roads.

El42 bridgestones that came with my new 2004 Acura Tl are unsafe. They flat spot and hydroplane in the rain. The tires are very unsafe in rain and they are considered "all season" they are not all season in my opinion. I lost control on a number of occasions with the el42 bridgestones because of hydroplaning. The faltspotting causes the tires to vibrate and bounce until they warm up. The car came with the original pvc type (early build) and the dealer refused to put the new "tu@" on my car. Ratings on this tire are terrible as shown on "tirerack. Com" Acura dealer refused to replace my el42 pvc original tires with acceptable safe tires. I have no choice but to put michelin pilot sport all seasons on my car quickly because I do not feel safe driving this car with the el42. Please advise- I know many people with the 2004 Acura Tl are unhappy with the el42's that came with them. The el42's are unsafe in the rain and snow they are not all season and should be investigated agressively before people lose control and get in accidents.

This complaint refers to the original equipment tires (bridgestone el-42, 235/45-17 93w ) supplied on the 2004 Acura Tl with 6 speed manual transmission. After just a short time I have found this tire to be entirely unsafe and unsuitable to this vehicle. I believe that both Acura and bridgestone should be held responsible for replacing this tire on all existing vehicles. This tire exhibits unsafe characteristics in wet weather, with noticeable drift and hydroplaning in any amount of standing water, even as little as 1/16 inch. In heavy rains, even with no standing water present, the tire seems incapable of dispersing water as quickly as it falls, again leading to vehicle instability. From a ride quality point of view the tire is also unsatisfactory in that it flat spots every morning, especially in cool weather but even in warmer weather as well, leading to vibrations in the initial miles of any drive. It is also especially harsh over roadway expansion joints, and is so loud on concrete pavements that it poses a safety hazard due to driver fatigue induced by the continuous noise. I also understand that there may be an issue regarding the rating as an "all season tire" with many owners reporting that this tire is virtually useless in any kind of snow conditions.

Vibration and shaking of steering wheel during normal driving. Replacement of the tires and numerous rebalancing have had no effect. Acura dealer is not responsive and Acura customer care has informed me this "a charateristic of the car" while at the same time admitting that "we have received numeous complaints about steering wheel vibration and our engineers are investigating the problem" I was also told there we was no timeline for resolution. Given the situation, I am growing concerned about the handling and stability of the vehicle in its current state. Acura has admitted there is a problem but has not fully disclosed the details. I am also worried because this seems to be a widespread issue affecting many Tl owners given the number of web forums I have visited on the subject.

This complaint referred to the original equipment tires (bridgestone el-42, 235/45-17 93w ) supplied on the 2004 Acura Tl with 5 speed automatic transmission. After just a short time I have found this tire to be entirely unsafe and unsuitable to this vehicle. I believe that both Acura and bridgestone should be held responsible for replacing this tire on all existing vehicle. This tire exhibits unsafe characteristics in wet weather, with noticeable drift and hydroplaning in any amount of standing water, even as little as 1/16 inch. In heavy rains, even with no standing water present, the tire seems incapable of dispersing water as quickly as it falls, again leading to vehicle instability. From a ride quality point of view the tire is also unsatisfactory in that it flat spots every morning, especially in cool weather but even in warmer weather as well, leading to vibrations in the initial miles of any drive. It is also especially harsh over roadway expansion joints, and is so loud on concrete pavements that it poses a safety hazard due to driver fatigue induced by the continuous noise. I also understand that there may be an issue regarding the rating as an "all season tire" with many owners reporting that this tire is virtually useless in any kind of snow or ice condition. I have tried to resolve this issue with both Acura and bridgestone to no avail.

Bridgestone turanza el-42 tires that are oem on my new 2004 Acura Tl have serious problems with "flat spotting". This perfect car runs like a flintstone car until tires warm up and round out. Acura is replacing with same brand and model tires that are supposed to be fixed.

The vibration in the bridgestone el42 turanza tires on 2004 Acura Tl resulted in accident in February 2004 and $1500 worth of undercarriage damage. Flatspotting and vibration in tires caused loss of control of the vehicle when attempting to stop the vehicle in inclement weather. Flatspotting and vibration started 1 week after purchase of vehicle. Have documentation of numerous attempts to get the problem resolved by dealer, but dealer was complacent in dealing with the issue thus resulting in the aformentioned accident. Loss of control caused vehicle to end up in oncoming traffic lane almost resulting in head on collision. Car slid into curb causing the 1500 damage. Tires have been replaced with michelin pilot sport tires. America Honda/Acura and bridgestone needs to be held accountable for their complacency in dealing with this issue. Please investigate quickly as lives can be at stake.

Tire vibration. At about 50 mph, the tires cause the entire car to vibrate. This continues at all highway speeds and does not seem to go away. I have contacted Acura several times and Acura's engineers 'are looking into it'.

Severe vibration from the factory installed bridgestone turanza el-42 tires on my new 2004 Acura Tl. The vehicle has only 1400 miles on it and has been to the dealer four times for the flat-spotting in the tires. I am concerned that these are not safe. Acura of dayton, ohio, Acura corporate and bridgestone say they is nothing they can do. Other 2004 Acura owners have filed complaints with Acura and there are many who have complained on various internet sites including one called tire rack.

Consumer noticed that after having the tires rotated at 10,000 miles and while driving at 60 mph vehicle vibrated uncontrollably. Consumer was able to maintain control of the vehicle, and pulled over. The vehicle was taken to the dealer for inspection, and mechanic determined that the tires needed to be replaced due to tread separation.

While driving 10-15 mph the passenger side front tire ruptured after it struck a shallow pothole. The replacement tire ruptured 2000 miles later when it hit a manhole cover. Michelin agreed to reimburse the consumer for the one tire. The consumer plans to replace all four tires.

Michelin tire failed at low mileage. Consumer found front left tire was low on air. Tire merchant not willing to do antying.

See all problems of the 2002 Acura TL 🔎.