Tire Problems of Chevrolet Malibu - part 1

I had a tire installed by a repair shop approximately one month ago. I recently discovered that the tire installed on my vehicle is the incorrect size. My vehicle requires size 225/55r17, but the shop installed size 245/45r17. This creates a safety concern due to improper fitment, which can affect handling, stability, and overall vehicle performance. I only discovered the issue after experiencing a separate flat tire and inspecting all tires on the vehicle. I contacted the business to have the issue corrected, but they refused to assist me. During multiple phone calls, both the manager and assistant manager were dismissive, unprofessional, and terminated the calls without providing any resolution. The incorrect tire remains on the vehicle, and the business has failed to correct their error.

See all problems of the 2018 Chevrolet Malibu 🔎.

See attached document for complaint.

See all problems of the 2013 Chevrolet Malibu 🔎.

The contact owns a 2023 Chevrolet Malibu equipped with continental tires, tire line: pro contact, tire size: 245/40/r19, dot number: 6y66wbr27. The contact stated that while his wife was driving at highway speeds, there was a blowout of the front driver's side tire. The cause of the failure was not yet determined. The tire was replaced. The contact stated that later while inspecting the vehicle it was discovered that the front passenger’s side tire had developed a sidewall blister. The cause of the failure was not yet determined. The manufacturer was notified of the failure. The local dealer was not contacted. The failure mileage was 11,000.

See all problems of the 2023 Chevrolet Malibu 🔎.

Tires came on vehicle oem firestone ft140. 205/65/r16. The vehicle, a 2016 chevy Malibu LS, has 25, 652 miles on it. The tires are maintained, rotated regularly, correct tire pressure etc. No signs of uneven wear, cupping etc. No wheel alignment needed etc. As per dealer. The tire tread is down to 4/32 in the rear and 6/32 in the front. Tread wear seems to be excessive for the rear tires on a vehicle with only 25k on it. I reached out to firestone and Chevrolet. Oem tires should not be wearing out this premature. When I asked the firestone rep about tread life they told me that they did not know what the expected tread life was on oem tires because they were made to specifics provided by vehicle manufacturer. If I were to buy the same again now as a replacements, they have a 50k tread life warranty, nut I am concerned about the premature tread wear. I will need to replace the tires at close to $1000, an an unexpected cost with such low mileage.

See all problems of the 2016 Chevrolet Malibu 🔎.

The contact owns a 2021 Chevrolet Malibu equipped with firestone ft140. The contact stated while driving during the rain while coming out of a complete stop the tires began to spin not gaining traction on the road. The manufacturer was not contacted. The failure mileage was approximately 2,000.

See all problems of the 2021 Chevrolet Malibu 🔎.

The contact owns a 2015 Chevrolet Malibu equipped with continental tire, tire line: contipro contact, tire size: 215/60r/16. The contact stated that while driving at a slow speed, the passenger’s side front tire experienced a blowout. The cause of the failure was not determined. The manufacturer and local dealer were not notified of the failure. The approximate failure mileage was 5,000. The VIN was not available.

See all problems of the 2015 Chevrolet Malibu 🔎.

The contact owns a 2016 chevy Malibu equipped with michelins tire line: the defender, tire size: 205/65/r16, dot number: b5ev01tx4919. The contact stated that the tire tread is worn within an untimely manner. The contact stated that the tires were replaced two years ago. The vehicle was taken to an independent mechanic where it was diagnosed that the quality of the tires were of a different material. The vehicle was taken to the dealer where service was denied due to the tires still had half the tread. The manufacturer was notified of the failure and informed the contact of the warranty. The failure mileage was 68, 618.

No traction, car slid into another car. Not the first time lost traction, just couldn't control it. Tires are only 1 yr and 3 months old. Have passed 2 state inspections. About of tread still on them. Have lost traction even in good weather. When I commented to someone at firestone that I kept losing traction they replied they aren't good tires.

See all problems of the 2012 Chevrolet Malibu 🔎.

Vehicle was unable to pass inspection due to tire (tread) separation on all 4 bridgestone potenza 's inspector pointed out that all 4 tires were cracked throughout the entire circumference on all 4 tires and dangerous/hazardous to drive on. Had to purchase new tires in order to pass inspection. . . Have taken photos of all the tires. . . Tires were purchased in oct, 2010 and replaced in Nov, 2015 -- tire had a total of 24,183 miles on it. . . And still has plenty of tread left.

See all problems of the 1999 Chevrolet Malibu 🔎.

I purchased 4 new 70,000 mile general altimax rt tires in February 2013 from walmart #3581. The tires now have exactly 10,774 miles on them. They are making loud thumping noises that I describe as a helicopter sound. The sound varies depending on vehicle speed, but it seems most noticeable around 35-50 miles per hour. Steering is difficult, and the car feels unstable. 70k tires should last longer than 10,774 miles on passenger car. These tires are defective and dangerous.

See all problems of the 2002 Chevrolet Malibu 🔎.

On 3/21/15, while driving at a speed of 60 mph, my right rear tire shredded completely causing me to swerve off of the road onto the shoulder. The tire is a remington emerald lx 215 / 60 r15, dot pjmw 6pkr (gswr30895).

The contact owns a 2008 Chevrolet Malibu equipped with goodyear lls2 tires, tire size p225/50/r18 and dot number: me6111012. The contact stated that the front passenger side tire failed prematurely. The tire was unable to retain air. The manufacturer was not made aware of the failure. The tire was not replaced. The approximate failure mileage was 3,000.

See all problems of the 2008 Chevrolet Malibu 🔎.

The contact owns a 2014 Chevrolet Malibu equipped with continental pro contact tires, line size: p215/60/r16. The contact stated that there was a large blister in the front passenger's tire. The contact mentioned that the tire pressure was low. The vehicle was taken to the dealer who inflated the tire. However, the tire low pressure indicator illuminated again. The tire and vehicle failure mileage was 701. The dot number was 6yx8bn4 3613.

See all problems of the 2014 Chevrolet Malibu 🔎.

I experienced a sudden tread separation on a goodrich passenger tire, leading to immediate and complete tire deflation. Luckily, I had just pulled out of a parking lot and was traveling <5mph. On inspection, the other 3 tires showed initial signes of similar failure, and all have been replaced.

See all problems of the 2001 Chevrolet Malibu 🔎.

The contact owns a 2006 Chevrolet Malibu. The contact stated that while driving approximately 70 mph, the tire became flat, the vehicle flipped four times and landed. The air bags did not deploy. The vehicle was destroyed. There were no injuries and a police report was not filed. The manufacturer was notified of the failure. The approximate failure mileage was 100,000. . . Updated 08-26-14 updated 08/29/2014.

See all problems of the 2006 Chevrolet Malibu 🔎.

While driving 70 miles per hr on the highway a loud noise and slight vibration was felt. After slowing down, the noise was not as loud and the vibration was less. On exiting the highway onto a busy road driving no more than 45 to 50 mile per hour the noise was not noticeable and the vibration seemed to be gone. On getting out of the car and looking at all four tires it was determined that the noise and vibration was coming from the highway surface. On pulling out of the garage the next morning the noise was back and the vibration was very noticeable. Road service was called to check to see if their was a flat tire or a problem with the wheel lugs. On arrival the service technician drove the car and discovered the back right tire had separated in several places causing the sound and the vibration. His statement was "someone up there must love you", this would have killed you if you had continued to drive on it. The tire was removed and will be taken back to the place of purchase. This is a firestone tire purchased 11/27/2010 31.

Odor from leaking cooling system. Car pulls to left. Driver does seat not adjust with the control. Front tires are worn down cords showing. Bought car at ourisman chev. Car dealer (34,523 miles) with platinum coverage. Car current (49,512 miles). They insisted that I should pay for new tires$295. Transmission flush $249. 00. Fuel induction service $179. Coolant hose$10. That my plan only cover surge tank which I have to pay $100. 00 deductible. I brought the car 5/17/12. Reading through complaints 2009 Malibu have similar car problem. I don't have the funds for all these problem for a car that own for this short period of time.

See all problems of the 2009 Chevrolet Malibu 🔎.

In 2006 I purchased 4 new cooper lifeliner touring sle tires from a local dealer for a 2002 Chevrolet Malibu. Tires were highly recommended and touted as being top of the line. Just after a few years of service, I had to frequently add air to the tires. This was especially worse under the weight of the front axle. Instead of checking air pressure once a month, I had to check about every 2 weeks. Causes the car to handle poorly on the road, steer harder, and fuel efficiency goes down. Returned to place of purchase, and tires were removed and reinstalled to reseal. Tires were always well maintained, rotated, cleaned, garaged, and properly aired to the specs of the vehicle. I even avoid pot holes. Shop owner commented how nice they were wearing. After only about 35k miles of service and 5/32 tread remaining I returned to the shop for 2nd or 3rd time again with same complaint of having to add air too frequently. Tires were again removed and shop owner stated the tire needed replaced due to a split on the inside and potential for complete tire failure. Shop owner stated that the tires are not warranted due to age. Tires gave no indication of imminent failure. Tires are not dry rotted, no noise, no repairs, no vibration and plenty of tread depth with at least 5/32 remaining. Tires conveniently just made it past the warranty. The shop had to install my temporary spare so I could get home. I found it a bit unusual that the shop owner wanted to keep the bad tire without charging me disposal fee. I still have the tires, and curiously all 4 have hair line splits on the insides. You can't see any indication on the outside of the tire. It has to be removed from the rim to see the problem areas. Not including my experiences, I know of at least 3 other instances of cooper lifeliner touring tires having air pressure issues. I consider this premature failure and potential for accidents.

The contact owns a 2002 Chevrolet Malibu equipped with uniroyal tigerpaw tires, size 215/60/15 (na). While driving 25 mph, the steering wheel started to vibrate violently. The contact merged to the side of the road and noticed that the tire had a knot on the tread belt. The failure occurred on four other occasions. The manufacturer was made aware of the failure. The tires were replaced by the manufacturer. The dot number was unknown. The failure mileage was 140,000.

The contact owns a 2004 Chevrolet Malibu equipped with toyo versato tires, size: 205/55/16. The contact stated that the tires were recently installed on the vehicle and while driving approximately 45 mph, attempting a right turn, the vehicle began to pull in the opposite direction. The contact stated that she did not experience a problem with the vehicle until the tires were installed. The manufacturer was made aware of the failure and referred the contact to the dealer. The vehicle was not taken to the dealer for diagnostic testing. The tires were not replaced. The VIN was not available. The approximate failure mileage of the tires was 15,000. The vehicle failure mileage was 165,000.

See all problems of the 2004 Chevrolet Malibu 🔎.

Vehicle at highway speeds of 65 - 75 mph will experience a vibration that can be felt in the seats and in the steering wheel. Vibration will not go away and will worsen after a wheel balancing. Manufacturer has stated that the vibration is inherent in the vehicles design and they will not repair the vehicle. The vibration causes premature tire where that could lead to possible tire failure.

See all problems of the 2011 Chevrolet Malibu 🔎.

The contact owns a 1997 Chevrolet Malibu. While driving 60 mph the vehicle was shaking and vibrating on the rear driver side. The vehicle was taken to a dealer tire shop and after inspecting it they found that the rear driver side tire was warped and had tread separation. The brand name was laramie, model, performer hp, size 235/60r15. The dealer where the tire was purchase was not notified. The manufacturer was called and confirmed based on the dot number that the tire was not on recall. The failure mileage was 159,598.

See all problems of the 1997 Chevrolet Malibu 🔎.

On 6 August 2010, I purchased 3 tires from ray's tire & service in st. Augustine, FL 32084, having a goodyear logo touted on their invoice and a huge goodyear sign on their buildings, therefore, one would assume that tires being bought and installed are goodyear. . . Well that's no so. . . While driving to cleveland, ohio suburb last Monday (20 sept 10), my left front tire separated on I-75 running at approx 74 mph heading north in london, ky. Had it been a woman driver with lesser driving skills, lord only knows the horrors. Upon returning to town and visiting ray's tire for a rebate, I was told it was not responsible and that tire installed was a kumo tire. . . Not a goodyear. . . Thus, I ask those of your overseeing highway safety, is this acceptable as a "truth-in-advertising" issue? thus I ask of you overseeing highway safety, is this acceptable to goodyear corporate board of director stewardship? thus I ask, is this acceptable from a highway safety standpoint and trustworthy, the average consumer can feel comfortable with? this 84 year old ww ii overseas veteran consumer does not believe so and feels strongly you shouldn't either.

On June 18, 2010 I had an accident that I believe was caused by a tire failure. No other vehicles were involved in this accident and there were no injuries. The vehicle was declared a total loss by my insurance company. On June 18, 2010 at approximately 6:00pm I was driving on the pennsylvania turnpike. My vehicle was headed west somewhere between the donegal exit and the new stanton exit of the turnpike. The weather conditions were what I consider ideal driving conditions. I was in the right lane of the two lane roadway and as I was approaching a moderate curve in the roadway my vehicle pulled severely to the left, I attempted to control the vehicle by using the steering wheel and moderate pressure on the brakes. No amount of control I tried to exert was of any value and within seconds my vehicle had struck the jersey barrier on the left side of the highway and spun into a position against the right jersey barrier facing traffic. I would like to add here that I had owned and driven this vehicle for over 10 years and approaching 75,000 miles, I was completely accustomed to maintaining control of this vehicle even while driving under the worst of conditions at highway speeds. At the time of the accident my vehicle was equipped with four p215/60r15 93t yokahama avid tour s s319 bw serial no. M6orplhr1410 tires. These tires were purchased and mounted on June 15, 2010 and had approximately 150 miles on them. The immediate and severe loss of the control I experienced is the basis for my opinion that one of these tires failed catastrophically to cause this accident. My auto insurance company has researched the matter and found that there were no manufacturer recalls, investigations, or technical service bulletins relating to the conditions described. I urged them to make a physical inspection of the vehicle to determine if the tires or any other defect of the vehicle could have caused the loss of control, but they were unwilling to do so. Updated ivoq 09/22/10.

We were driving on interstate 84 westbound at cascade locks where there is construction. We had a sidewatt blowout on the left front tire. The tire was purchased new from les scwab tires in portland oregon. We are taking the car there tomorrow March 8, 2010 for the tire to be replaced. The information off of the invoice is a follows. 205/65r-15 94t tourevo all seasons blackwall. We had the tires replaced on June 9, 2008 just prior to a vacation. We did not see anything hit the car or the tire, and there did not appear to be any cuts on the tire prior to the trip. The tread that is left on the tire is about 3/16th of an inch or more. The tread looks fairly good.

2009 Malibu,I have replaced 1 tire when side wall broke after hitting a bump also have a bent rim on a different wheel,tires are weak don't ride well, complained to dealer and gm was not willing to compromise on cost of new rim and different brand tires. Was told that gm does not warranty the tires. I have owned chevy's for 40 years,I presently own 3 that are all on the road no more gm's for me.

2006 chevy Malibu with defective tires. The tires have splits and cracks on all four tires. The tires were manufactured by continental. Gm says this is normal and safe. Only 28k miles.

2006 chevy Malibu with defective tires. Customer states that the tires have splits and cracks on all four tires. The tires were manufactured by continental. All of the tires were replaced with a different brand name. Updated 09/20/07. The consumer stated the dealer did not return the defective tires to the manufacturer. Updated.

I've had 2 tires manufactured by cooper tire fail due to faulty construction. Both tires have failed within the past year. They are 215/60r15 avenger gt rwl tires manufactured by cooper tires and I purchased them at kauffman tires. Serial #u9mwff6032.

Consumer noticed the original front and rear tires were rotten from inside to outside, and are leaking air. Firestone model, size, and dot# unknown. Please provide detailed information.

Front tires wear and lose air pressure prematurely.

See all problems of the 2000 Chevrolet Malibu 🔎.

Consumer states that the vehicle needs new tires every 30,000 miles. Please provide any further information.

See all problems of the 1998 Chevrolet Malibu 🔎.

The car jerks at 70 mph, dealer could not find the problem. The cruise control was stuck in the on position when starting the car (was not activated), dealer could not find the problem. The car feels unstable and shacks at 50+ mph (since the time of purchase the tire pressure has not been adjusted), the dealer said the tire was over inflated, tire pressure was corrected, but the shacking has become worse.

Tires, especially the ones in front had developed wear out in middle without prior warning. Consumer contacted dealer, but they could not state what had caused wear just on front. Firestone, p-215/60r15. Please provide more information.

All four tires are splitting in the grooves. Tire size p215/60r15 , dot# w2mwaaa278 contacted dealer, and dealer stated the tires are dry rotting. *akit is 1997 Chevrolet Malibu 4 dr.