Brake Disc Rotor Problems of Chevrolet Silverado - part 1

The contact owns a 2002 Chevrolet Silverado. The contact was informed by an independent mechanic that the rear rotors were worn out, which caused the parking brake to malfunction. The vehicle was not diagnosed or repaired. The manufacturer was notified of the failure. The approximate failure mileage was 167,000.

See all problems of the 2002 Chevrolet Silverado 🔎.

2009 Chevrolet Silverado. Consumer states problem with vehicle rotor three weeks after the vehicle was purchased, the vehicle had to be serviced for a front rotor problem. Since then, the rotors have been turned and replaced. On August 24, 2010 they were turned again.

See all problems of the 2009 Chevrolet Silverado 🔎.

The contact owns a 2004 Chevrolet Silverado. While driving 25 mph, the brake pedal extended to the floor when depressed. The contact shifted into first gear. The vehicle coasted for three minutes before it stopped. The emergency brake was not applied. The contact drove the vehicle home without functioning brakes. He inspected the vehicle and determined that the failure was caused by a split left rotor. The rotor was replaced. The defective rotor is available, if needed. The current and failure mileages were 68,000. Updated 12/12/2007 updated 12/12/07.

See all problems of the 2004 Chevrolet Silverado 🔎.

I have a 2002 Chevrolet Silverado $wd extended cab short bed truck. This vehicle was purchased new by me. Currently the vehicle has 39,950 miles on it. Since approx 12,000 miles I noticed longer stopping distances. I took it to selling the dealer & was told everything was normal. This weekend I installed new ac delco front brake pads & installed new wagner rotors. Upon removing the rotors I couldn't help but notice that there was a issue with the old original never cut rotors. The rotor surface was deteriorated hence causing the problem with loss of stopping distance. Note: the brake pads were the original gm. I am a state certified inspection mechanic. After surfing the internet & seeing al of the complaints from other Silverado owners I couldn't help but to file a complaint. If this was addressed earlier maybe I would of felt more comfortable driving this vehicle more. As you will see the usual low miles we drove other vehicles instead.

: the contact stated while traveling various speeds, the brakes squeaked and when the brake pedal was depressed, the vehicle shimmied. The dealership determined the rotors were rusted from the inside out, and needed to be replaced.

2006 chevy truck with brake system and suspension problems. Customer states he has had problems with this vehicle since he purchased it. Consumer wants to have this vehicle checked. The consumer stated the brakes made a noise and would shake when coming to a stop. The consumer removed the wheels and discovered the rotors had grooved out pretty badly for a vehicle that only had 20,000 miles. When the consumer went to the dealer the last time, they informed him they would replace the brakes one more time and after that the warranty would end. Updated 12/12/2007 the consumer stated drivers front door harder to close than passenger and the consumer further stated hearing noise in lft wheel area. Updated 12/12/07.

See all problems of the 2006 Chevrolet Silverado 🔎.

I have a 2003 Silverado truck that has only 24,000 miles on it and chevy said the warranty was out and my truck had to have brakes and new rotors put on this week. I fell this is not right and they should have taken care of this truck for me.

See all problems of the 2003 Chevrolet Silverado 🔎.

: the contacts stated while driving at various speeds, the brakes were less effective when hot. The dealership determined the rotors were corroded and this was a result of road salt. The vehicle was in a salt belt state. Updated 09/13/06.

: the contact stated a manufacturer recall letter # 85068 was received for corrosion of the vehicle speed sensors. The corrosion made them inoperative. The vehicle was taken to the dealership who determined the sensors could not be removed without damaging the rotors. The repair was offered at cost,.

Front and back rotors need replaced, even though vehicle has low mileage, due to rusting rotors. This creates an unforeseen expense as well as hazardous conditions that may cause brake failure.

: the contact stated during a tire replacement the dealer noticed the brake rotors were rusted. The vehicle had no indication of a problem prior to the tire replacement. The dealer determined the rotors needed to be replaced.

Took vehicle in for routine oil change @ approx. 36,000 miles. Asked service technician to examine brakes for wear. Technician stated that the front disc brakes were fine, however, the rear rotors were flaking and rusted. Rear rotors and pads needed to be replaced. Technician stated that this seemed to be a frequent problem with Chevrolet trucks. He also stated that this was not typical wear based on his experience, particularly at such a low mileage.

All four rotors rusted threw, all four had to be replaced, only 56000 miles on this 2000 chevy Silverado pick up truck.

See all problems of the 2000 Chevrolet Silverado 🔎.

: the contact stated while having recall #05v379000 for the abs performed on the vehicle, the dealership determined the rotors needed to be replaced.

See all problems of the 2001 Chevrolet Silverado 🔎.

: the contact stated while attempting to apply brake pressure there was an increase in stopping distance. This occurred at various speeds on normal roads without any prior warning. The dealership determined the rear rotors needed to be replaced. The manufacturer was alerted. 05/30/06 updated - dealer removed rear wheels and noted rotors flaking apart.

: the contact stated twice while braking at various speeds the brake pedal has gone to the floor. The brake pedal must be pumped to return to operating position. The dealership was unable to determine a problem. Also, while the vehicle was being inspected by the dealership, it was determined the rear rotors were rusted on the inside. The manufacturer has been alerted.

The brakes have not felt as though they were working properly since I purchased this truck. Sponge brake difficulty stopping at slow speeds longer stopping distance pulling to one side. I have brought it back to the dealer twice with this complaint. I felt the problem was becoming worse. I took it back again, the dealer now tells me that the rear rotors are rusted and pitted beyond repair and the front rotors are showing rust also and that they will not cover this expense. This vehicle has under 30,000 miles. I called the manufacturer for assistance and they will only pay for one rotor (a good will gesture) this is a terrible response, I have now found that I am only one of many with this problem. This is a safety issue that should be published I had very little warning of problem.

: the contact stated while inspecting the brakes on the vehicle corrosion was noticed on the rotors. The vehicle was taken to the dealership for inspection. Upon inspection, the dealership determined the rotors needed to be replaced. The contact replaced the rotors and notified the manufacturer.

: the consumer stated all 4 rotors were peeling along the laminations and exposing the metal plates. There was no evidence of rust, just extreme an breakdown of the material. The vehicle was not exposed to hazardous or severe weather conditions. Although the rotors continued to deteriorate, the vehicle has not been seen by a dealer.

: the contact stated the vehicle was taken to an independent repair shop to have the tires rotated. The technician determined all four rotors have reached an unsafe thickness. The rotors will be replaced within the next week. Updated 1/25/2006 - the rotors were badly rusted and worn paper thin. This vehicle is often used to tow trailers, boats and other loads.

: the contact stated the rear passenger side brake rotor busted while driving at 20 mph. The contact was depressing the brake pedal to the floor with little braking capabilities. There were no visible road hazards which could have caused the rotors to fail. Prior to this failure the vehicle was taken to the dealership. Upon inspection both rear rotors were rusted. According to the dealership this was normal. The defective rotors were replaced. Updated 1/25/2006 -.

: the contact stated while depressing the brake pedal the vehicle vibrated. The vehicle was taken to an independent repair shop for inspection. The repair personnel determined the rear rotors were deteriorated and needed to be replaced. The vehicle is currently at the repair shop awaiting repairs.

The contact stated a squeal was coming from the brakes. He took the vehicle to a mechanic who determined the rear rotors were rusted. Then, he took the vehicle to the dealer, where it was purchased. They advised him this was a very common problem because of the grade of metal being used in the rotors. The front rotors appeared to be fine. The vehicle has not been repaired .

The contact received NHTSA recall campaign 05v379000 concerning the abs brakes. Upon inspection by the dealer the wheel speed sensors were in excellent shape. All four rotors were completely corroded, and in needed replacement. The rotors were replaced at the contact's expense. The manufacturer was notified. They offered a partial reimbursement for yearly maintenance.

The contact states that he received a recall letter concerning the anti lock brakes. He took the vehicle to a dealer. While performing the recall repairs the dealer noted there was a problem with the front rotors. The dealer determined the rotors was made of poor quality material andwas not receiving sufficient support and wear from the pads. The dealer completed the recall repair, however the rotor problem has not been corrected at this time.

See all problems of the 1999 Chevrolet Silverado 🔎.

2003 Chevrolet Silverado. My vehicle is two years old and only has 13, 000 miles on it. Had to take vehicle to dealership to have the brakes checked. The brakes were grinding metal to metal, and the brake pads were worn out. The brakes should have not worn out at 13, 000 miles. The warranty expired since the consumer had the vehicle for two years. The consumer should not have to pay to have the brakes fixed. The dealership told the consumer that warranty was for two years. Or 24, 000 miles. Just noticed this week how bad the brakes were. Did not have any accidents, and when pressing on the brakes could hear them scrape against the metal.

Both rear brake rotors for 2002 chevy Silverado had to be replaced due to corrosion. The vehicle had only been driven 2,525 miles between the last service yet no brake problem was noticed by the technician at that time.

Vehicle, 2003 chevy 1500, 2 wheel drive truck. Part failed: rear brake rotor. The rear brake rotors are failing internally. Large pieces of rust are breaking away in the cooling fin area.

2003 Chevrolet Silverado. The contact stated the rear rotors wore out and the pads were still at half. He noticed this on October 14, 2005 when he heard a rubbing from the rear brakes. He took the vehicle to a local mechanic, and they diagnosed the problem. Has an appointment with the dealership to have this inspected.

Took truck to have brakes done on all four wheels. (could not stop but was able to steer around trouble, was reason for doing this) rear brakes and pads had to be replaced, they could not cut the rotors due to rust. I have never seen this condition in forty five years of working on cars or trucks, the rust ate away the pads to 1/3 their size. This condition should not have happened. I can see changing rotors because of heat or metal on metal, not from rust. I have the parts that have been replaced. The front rotors and pads did not need to be replaced. This happened in less than 5,000 miles as I had a new york emissions and safety inspection and it passed both.

I have a 2003 chevy Silverado 1500 with 28000 miles. I purchased the vehicle in March 2003. The rotors on the rear breaks are completely rusted. The dealer would not warrant the rotors and pad even though I complained about the problem while the truck was still under warranty. The brakes are extremely soft, especially at low speeds. I want the entire brake system replaced for safety. I have 2 friends with the same vehicle, both have twice replaced pads and rotors in less than 60000 miles! I cannot afford to pay this replacement my self. I want chevy to make good on a faulty design that I paid my entire savings on!!!!.

Contact stated while driving vehicle did not brake well. The vehicle was taken to a goodyear tire to have the tires replaced. The mechanic told her the tires wore out. This resulted from the rotors being rusted. Also, the rear brakes wore out due to the rotors being rusted. The rotors needed to be replaced. The repairs will be made at the contact's expense. However, the repairs haven't been done at this time.

Defective rear brakes.

Replace rear rotors on vehicle with 27,000 miles on it. Little wear on pads. Mfg rotors were obviously defective. I have original rotors and the metal is breaking apart.

The contact owns a 2003 Chevrolet Silverado. The tires wore out very quickly took the vehicle to midas to have the tires replaced, and they told the contact that the rotors were pitted. The manufacturer told him that I would have to pay $1000 to replace the rotors and the emergency brake pads the contact felt that the metal in the rotors were worn out .