Nissan Rogue owners have reported 1,468 problems related to power train (under the power train category). The most recently reported issues are listed below. Also please check out the statistics and reliability analysis of Nissan Rogue based on all problems reported for the Rogue.
The front and back collision warning system lights are on indicating that they are not working, this is a Nissan 2025 rouge sv, they turned on when accelerating from stop and now I have lost my turbo pressure (won't go over 0), and when in park it revs up and down without my input. Accelerating from stop turns car into limp mode.
See
all problems of the 2025 Nissan Rogue
🔎.
Failed components: engine valvetrain, powertrain/transmission, and electronic throttle control, directly linked to open federal safety recalls NHTSA 26v-080 and 26v-081. Safety risk: the vehicle was sold cpo by downey Nissan with unaddressed safety recalls. It suffers from severe engine vibration, a sharp mechanical valvetrain ticking noise, a persistent burning odor, and catastrophic transmission gear slippage that abruptly drops out of gear and slams back into drive mid-turn, creating an extreme collision hazard in traffic.
The egr cooler failed and caused a significant coolant leak into my engine. Causing sudden engine failure while driving. I experienced sudden power loss, loss of throttle control due to the motor being placed in the "safety mode" due to the engine coding, and was only able to drive on the shoulder of the road at ~25mph, causing traffic disruptions until I was able to safely exit the roadway. I was able to get the vehicle diagnosed by Nissan, it resulted in over $10000 of repairs to fix the damage. The vehicle has less than 80000 miles and is still covered under extended warranty. However, Nissan rejected the repair claim due to it being the egr cooler that failed.
See
all problems of the 2022 Nissan Rogue
🔎.
2017 Nissan Rogue awd – cvt transmission failure at approximately 57,000 miles. Vehicle is currently undriveable. Diagnostic testing identified p0776 / pressure control solenoid "b. " two independent mechanics have determined that the cvt requires complete replacement. Nissan has previously extended cvt warranty coverage and entered into class-action settlements involving cvt failures in 2014–2018 Rogue vehicles. Requesting that NHTSA record this premature cvt failure for consideration of a potential defect trend.
See
all problems of the 2017 Nissan Rogue
🔎.
I was driving at soscol Ave napa 94558 CA when engine warning came out and vehicle power reduced to less than 40mph on 55mph road. Component failure was engine. My safety and others may or may not be at risk but the road was 55mph and the vehicle went on limp mode. Problems were raised to napa Nissan dealership @1:50pm on 09/21/2026 however similar problems are reported with the same vehicle nationwide. Vehicle still in dealership possession and conducting their own inspection as of this writing. Warning lights and messages appears while driving around 6:30am napa California engine malfunction and I think it went to limp mode it’s having a hard time going 30-40mph. I was on the way to work when it happened this morning around 6:30am @ 50,394 mls the engine malfunction error went off, and the engine sounds were different than usual and power was reduced. Also the driver seats feels not sturdy and squeaking a lot when driving. I have video documenting it and how it’s sounds like.
See
all problems of the 2023 Nissan Rogue
🔎.
While driving the start/stop fault popped up then the forward collision warning, automatic emergency braking, parking collision warning malfunctioned. The vehicle also lost power when accelerating, rpm would go high but vehicle wouldn’t go any faster. Engine light came on. Had it scanned codes p0196 (engine oil temperature sensor ‘a’ range/performance) & p0507 (idle control system rpm-higher than expected). Fuel consumption goes fast.
When going over a smooth surface the awd would trigger the right rear brake and cause the caliper to hang. Over time I started getting warning indicators on the dash that appeared to result in the epb being reset. When taking the car in, it was identified that there was uneven brake wear, the outboard right rear shoe was at 1mm whereas the inboard right rear shoe was still at 8mm. It was determined that the caliper was hanging by the shop.
It is 15 September 2026; but back in June time frame 2026 an engine recall was called for my 2024 Nissan rouge. Dangerous to the point that car would shut down or burst into flame with not warnings while operating the vehicle on the road and at all speeds - hgwy. Nissans consumer affairs division discussed this in chat rooms with owners of the year vehicles 2023 - 2025? effected that when the engine is replaced you must address and change out the transmission. The vehicle is built on vct technology - variable compression technology??. The replacement engine is so robust and apparently stronger than ome - original manufacture equipment that marrying it with the ome transmission in a short period of time the engine would destroy the trans. Today only a few short months later at 5 am traveling on rt78 at max speed the trans went into limp mode. Limp mode is Nissan's reference terminology I took it to the dealership where I leased it - and changed out the engine and married the anticipated trans failure - it was only a matter of time - it failed, the vehicle lost power, steering failed the car from 71 mph quickly slowed would not go any further it dropped speed so fast it was almost hit from behind by a tractor trailer - Nissan's consumer affairs division full well knows of the combination repair issues and now the dealership I brought it to, scanned the truck confirmed my worst nightmare was true that after they replaced the engine on recall and tried to tip-toe away from a trans replacement the engine destroyed the trans and my wife was in grave danger they expect us to pay $ 2,200. 00 to replace the trans - they are refusing to pay for the replacment caused by them ignoring responsibility. We want out of this lease expunge the lease agreement and step back from demands of excessive $ for high milage take the vehicle back and put us into a new vehicle - "lemon law' recall not rectified and lives are at risk - contact me please 484 425 0453 rob monty - urgent!!.
See
all problems of the 2024 Nissan Rogue
🔎.
The defect: my 2023 Nissan Rogue awd equipped with 1. 5l 3 cylinder vc turbo engine began making growling,, shaking noises matching the symptoms of known engine main bearing failures as outlined in NHTSA recall 25v437/26v080 (r25e2). This happened with only about 44,000 miles on my vehicle. I brought it in to oak ridge Nissan under the recall on September 22, 2026. . I was expecting them to check the oil pan for any metallic debris or further related problems. The service mechanic noted: "reprogram ecm and complete test drive with no dtc po524 present. Good condition r25e20 0. 9. " the mechanic also noted "transmission mounts. Just the one vibrating badly possible motor mount also but would need tostart with trans mount. " (which they listed as a $1,146. 76 expense. ) I was told this is my responsibility but it is not usual for a car with 44,000 to have this kind of problem. I don't feel they inspected this problem in a sufficient professional manner. Warning safety problem: the car had a engine malfunction when I brought it in. It now reads awd malfunction the nature of this engine sound, awd warning, and "auto start/stop dashboard warning,, and recalled problem render this vehicle unsafe to drive. I have owned three other Nissans over the years and this one is the most problematic - it should not have this kind of problem at such low mileage.
While driving on a major public highway, the vehicle suffered a sudden, catastrophic loss of motive propulsion, dropping immediately into a dangerous transmission limp mode. The dashboard displayed a critical error message stating 'service cvt power reduced' alongside a check engine light. The vehicle became an immediate stationary traffic hazard in a live highway lane, completely unable to accelerate or move safely out of the way of oncoming high-speed traffic. The hazard was severe enough to require an emergency safety response from the gwinnett county police department (case #pd262540884) to secure the scene and protect the disabled vehicle until a flatbed tow truck could remove it. A subsequent diagnostic scan by a certified corporate dealer (premier Nissan) confirmed complete internal transaxle failure, throwing diagnostic trouble codes p0741-00 (torque converter), p0746-00, and p187e-09.
2018 Rogue hybrid fwd, ~101,090 miles. Driving normal, stopped car due to traffic, on acceleration had sudden revving without corresponding acceleration/lurching, hybrid warning followed by cel, p0776 and p0701, Nissan dealer diagnosis requiring replacement of hybrid transaxle 31020-3zx4c, quoted transaxle $8,818. 28 and total repair around $12,500.
See
all problems of the 2018 Nissan Rogue
🔎.
If Nissan knows that the 2021 Nissan Rogue has a transmission problems with valve body replacement. This could be a hazard when driving. Please recall!.
See
all problems of the 2021 Nissan Rogue
🔎.
On August 31, 2026, my 2023 Nissan Rogue suffered a total structural failure of the factory plastic engine oil pan. During a routine maintenance check, the internal pressed-in brass threaded insert completely separated from the composite plastic casing and began spinning freely. This design failure made it impossible to safely remove, secure, or torque the oil drain plug to factory specifications. Nissan has documented this exact engineering defect in technical service bulletin TSB ntb22-003. The failure occurs under normal operating force due to an inadequate layer of composite material holding the metal insert in place. The repair facility (jiffy lube) officially certified on the repair invoice that this failure was caused entirely by a "factory design flaw," completely ruling out technician error or external road damage. I was forced to pay $778. 25 out of pocket to replace the failed factory assembly to ensure the vehicle was safe to operate.
My 2022 Nissan Rogue 1. 5l vc-turbo is experiencing repeated limp-mode/reduced-power events, severe hesitation, poor acceleration, rough/shaking idle, and recurring dtc u0652 after Nissan marked recall 25v-437 complete. The vehicle is available for inspection. Reduced-power symptoms were documented as early as Dec. 2024 and significantly worsened by oct. 3, 2025 at approximately 100,400 miles, including loss of power at highway speed. I previously reported this condition to NHTSA under complaint #11696068. The first Nissan dealer (willis) used a borescope, claimed “sludge,” recommended engine replacement, refused to provide supporting photos/evidence, and did not remove the oil pan. Willis later provided me an oil sample, which I submitted for independent analysis. That analysis showed multiple bearing-associated wear metals without an abnormal viscosity condition explaining the findings, and confirmed the oil pan was had not been checked. A second Nissan dealer was contacted to performed Nissan’s recall screening/software procedure. No engine light could be on upon arrival. Because the intermittent condition did not occur during the brief test, Nissan marked the recall complete. The warning light is now illuminated again and the vehicle is again entering limp mode/reduced power. I contacted Nissan for assistance and was told they would not provide towing or further recall assistance because the recall is listed as complete. I am currently stranded with the same safety condition after Nissan declared the vehicle remedied. My complaint is failed recall remedy/recall effectiveness. Nissan’s screening process classified this vehicle as remedied, but the safety condition continues and appears progressive. Nissan is now using its own “recall complete” status to refuse further action despite recurring loss of power and independent evidence of internal engine wear.
Whilst driving my 2023 Rogue the awd light came on with a warning malfunction see owner’s manual and the check engine light came on. The start/stop/ idle feature turned off at the same time. . I was not able to stop so I reduced my speed from 55 to 40 and proceeded to finish the drive an additional 12 miles. I parked the vehicle and called for an appt at Nissan. I took the car in for service and when I got there I showed them the pic of what the dashboard was reading. I later received a text that no warning lights came on when the service tech attempted to drive it to make his report. I was recommended to pick up the vehicle and if it happened again to return. I cannot and will not drive this vehicle. I have only been driving the car for 7 months and this is the second issue I have had with it. I do not feel safe or comfortable driving it.
Nissan Rogue sport with 39,500 miles. While driving on a busy highway the vehicle all of a sudden was losing power and surging dangerously. Barely made it home. There were no warning lights. It had to be towed to a garage. There were no leaks. I was told the cvt transmission would have to be replaced. It was towed to a Nissan dealer who verified the cvt transmission would indeed need to be replaced. Nissan said that because the motor oil changes were not done at a Nissan dealer they would not give good will assistance on this car. I told them that motor oil has nothing to do with the cvt transmission. They didn't seem to care, they just said they are not helping.
The contact owns a 2026 Nissan Rogue. The contact stated that on several occasions while accelerating, the vehicle failed to accelerate or respond as needed. The rpm was elevated; however, the vehicle failed to move. The contact stated that during the failure, the transmission was shifted between park(p) and drive(d) until the proper gear was recognized and the vehicle moved forward. The vehicle was taken to a dealer where it was scheduled to be diagnosed or repaired. The manufacturer was notified of the failure. The failure mileage was 1,587.
The contact owned a 2021 Nissan Rogue. The contact stated that while the vehicle was parked, the vehicle independently accelerated and the brakes failed to operate while the brake pedal was depressed, causing the front center of the vehicle to crash into a tree. No warning lights were illuminated. The air bags deployed as needed. The vehicle was deemed a total loss at the scene. Neither a police report nor fire department report was filed. The contact was seated in the driver’s seat, and her husband was seated in the front passenger seat and sustained several injuries, including seat belt bruises and cuts on both arms and hands. The contact and her husband both sought medical attention. The manufacturer was not notified of the failure. The failure mileage was approximately 58,000.
On xxx at approx 1:29 pm, I was driving my 2023 Nissan Rogue (purchased new xxx chapman Nissan philadelphia) on [xxx] with my family including 2 young children and my brother-in- law, heading to [xxx]. At highway speed (~65 mph), "service cvt power reduced" warning appeared, complete loss of acceleration. I had to press accelerator to floor to avoid crash. I managed to drive approx 1 mile to emergency stop at [xxx] fenimore cooper service area, [xxx]. My family with 2 young children was terrified, we had to stop and rest in service area. This could have caused fatal crash - trucks behind me at 70 mph, no power, no way to accelerate. If I could not reach service area, we would have been rear-ended at high speed with 2 children in car. This is not just breakdown, this is life-threatening defect. Prior:xxx 27,756 mi cvt warning photo, xxx 28,024 mi cvt warning photo - went to [xxx] Nissan front desk, showed photo, refused repair, said "bring it when light is on" no ro 08/21/2026 highway failure with family including 2 children. Repair 08/22/2026 ro xxx [xxx] Nissan "safety repairs" valve body back order + water pump. Please investigate - next family with children may not be lucky information redacted pursuant to the freedom of information act (foia), 5 u. S. C. 552(b)(6).
Engine failed while driving. Coolant intrusion number one cylinder.
The vehicle experienced a catastrophic engine/motor failure. The engine became extremely loud/rattled and subsequently locked up, causing the vehicle to lose the ability to operate. The vehicle is currently being held for diagnosis/repair and should be available for inspection upon request. The vehicle experienced the failure while I was driving and left me stranded on a mountain. The vehicle lost its ability to operate, creating a significant safety risk because I was left stopped and without reliable transportation. A sudden engine failure while driving could also create a traffic hazard for the occupants and other motorists. Yes. The vehicle has been taken to a Nissan dealership for diagnosis following the failure. The vehicle experienced a catastrophic engine failure/lock-up. I am requesting the dealership’s written diagnostic report and confirmation of the exact failed component. The vehicle has been presented to Nissan for inspection and diagnosis. Nissan is currently involved in determining the cause of the engine failure. There has not been a police inspection that I am aware of. I am requesting that Nissan preserve and provide all diagnostic findings, photographs, technician notes, and repair records. Prior to the failure, the vehicle began exhibiting abnormal engine symptoms, including a loud/rattling engine noise and difficulty operating normally. The symptoms occurred shortly before the catastrophic failure on August 14, 2026. The vehicle subsequently became inoperable when the engine locked up. I am requesting the dealer’s diagnostic scan to determine whether any warning codes or messages were stored before or during the failure.
1 unknown. I suspect a malfunction involving the electronic gear-selection/shift-control system or transmission control system. I personally placed the vehicle in park while the engine was running. After I exited the vehicle and was away from it, the vehicle moved on its own. When I returned after hearing the impact, the gear selector was no longer in park and was in another position. The vehicle and relevant electronic systems are available for inspection. 2 the vehicle was parked on a steep hill. I had personally placed the vehicle in park and exited it with my daughter. While I was inside my home, the vehicle moved without my knowledge or intentional input and struck my garage. The vehicle was running and was my spouse was still in the car when the movement occurred. The unexpected movement created a risk of the vehicle striking a person, entering a roadway, or causing a more serious crash or injury. 3 no. The incident has not yet been independently reproduced or confirmed. The vehicle needs to be inspected to determine why it moved after I placed it in park. 4 no not yet 5 no known warning lamps, messages, or symptoms occurred before the incident. The vehicle appeared to be operating normally. I had no warning that it would leave park or move.
While the vehicle was being driven on a busy city street, it suddenly lost the ability to accelerate. The vehicle displayed multiple warning messages, including “warning low oil pressure — stop vehicle” and a collision warning. The accelerator no longer operated the vehicle normally. After the vehicle was shut off, it would not restart. The vehicle was taken to a Nissan dealership. The dealership initially could not communicate with the vehicle’s can system. After approximately three days of diagnosis, the dealer determined that there was a short to ground in the vehicle’s main wiring harness. There was no accident or other known event that caused the failure. The vehicle was operating normally before the incident. I am particularly concerned because the failure occurred while the vehicle was being driven and resulted in a sudden loss of acceleration. This created a potentially dangerous loss of propulsion. I am asking NHTSA to record and review this incident as a potential safety-related defect involving premature failure of the main wiring harness and the resulting loss of vehicle propulsion and can communication. I do not know whether this is an isolated failure or a broader design/manufacturing problem. I am reporting it so that NHTSA can determine whether similar complaints exist involving this vehicle, wiring harness, or failure mode. Note-main harness replacement cost was approximately $4,450. In my opinion the work was diagnosed incompletely and the fauly could have been traced to individual wire (s) or electronic module. Photos show no obvious burning.
See
all problems of the 2019 Nissan Rogue
🔎.
The vehicle was sold to me 3 months outside of the extended manufacturer's warranty in December of 2025 with known issues with the cvt transmission. Since owning the vehicle for less than one year, the transmission has begun to fail. The vehicle was taken to a different Nissan dealership (poughkeepsie Nissan in wappingers falls, NY) where it has been confirmed that the transmission is failing and will not go into gear correctly. Service records for the vehicle were pulled from the dealership that sold it to me (romeo Nissan in kingston, NY) and the transmission had never been serviced or repaired. If the vehicle slips out of gear or will not go into gear correctly, this could cause a major accident including life threatening injuries and potentially death to myself or others in vehicles around me. When I reached out to Nissan consumer affairs, they only offered to cover 50% of the cost to repair or replace the transmission which is a cost of $3200 to myself which would cause a severe, undue hardship to my situation. This vehicle is not safe to be on the roadways, as it can fail at any time. There have not been any warning lights or messages to the transmission issue. The transmission can be felt slipping while driving. The cvt transmission is a known issue with Nissan engines, which is why they offered an extra, extended warranty on these vehicles, but romeo Nissan let the vehicle sit on the lot until it was outside of the extended warranty before it was sold to me.
I brought my car to my mechanic for a routine oil change and the drain plug on the oil pain failed. It is made with plastic and melted due to exposure to high engine heat rendering it useless and requiring the oil pan and drain to be replaced. When we called Nissan they said this is a known issue with several Nissan models and they have since had to retrofit a part to correct the malfunction. Had this plug failed while I was driving it could have caused massive engine failure. There were no indications there was anything wrong with my oil pan and this mechanic has done my oil changes on several cars for over 10 years. Despite the associate at the Nissan dealership we got the replacement part from acknowledging this is a known issue, no service campaign has been issued. I called consumer affairs to discuss next steps in order to get this covered under warranty and was told to call back with my invoice information to submit for reimbursement. Upon calling back I was told they will not cover the repair as it was done at an independent mechanic which I was not informed of on my previous call. They assured me a supervisor would call me back by the end of the following day and I have not received a call from anyone. Failure for Nissan to take responsibility for a manufacturing defect is now leading to potential safety hazards and undue financial responsibility on its consumer's behalf since their employees are improperly trained. I will never purchase a Nissan again and can guarantee I will share this poor experience with everyone I know.
While driving the car, it seemed to slip into neutral. We took it to the dealer who does all our maintenance on the car and was told we needed to replace the transmission. The cost would be $6046. 45 plus tax. The car is 10 years old, but only has 58,714 miles on it. We contacted Nissan consumer affairs, and they only told us that the car is outside the extended warranty of 7 years Nissan offered as part of the class action suit. We purchased the extended warranty of 7 years, 84,000 miles when we purchased the car. They actually offered us nothing. Based on all the complaints, suits and class action suit, it is clear the Nissan continuous variable transmission is inherently defective and a traffic safety hazard. We should be reimbursed for replacement of our transmission.
See
all problems of the 2016 Nissan Rogue
🔎.
I acquired a 2015 Nissan Rogue, but it seems the transmission has failed. Interestingly, the transmission is identified as a 2014 model within the 2015 vehicle. I reached out to the dealership for clarification on whether the transmission had been replaced, but I received no assistance. Discussions in a Nissan forum reveal that this issue is common among Nissan vehicles, yet there is no official recall. Numerous owners have expressed concerns regarding the transmission's reliability. Given that my vehicle has only 82,000 miles, it is unexpected for the transmission to malfunction at this stage.
See
all problems of the 2015 Nissan Rogue
🔎.
Warning lights keep popping up then something will go wrong with the car. A cvt malfunction came up and wouldn’t allow me to put the car in park then after I turned the car off it went back to normal. More random lights will come up they will all be different problems with the engine or system then once car has been off for a few it would go back to normal.
Throwing code p0841. Rpm’s bouncing, slow to accelerate, enters limp mode. Dangerous when on the road as the car is not properly accelerating with the flow of traffic and could potentially stall out in the middle of the road. Will need either the valve body replaced or an entire transmission replacement. After a lot of research, this is an extremely common problem with this cvt transmission and I feel it should actually be addressed by Nissan instead of customers continually having to shell out thousands of dollars in repairs of a transmission they know fails. This car doesn’t even have 100k miles on it.
I attempted to speak with a service advisor at Nissan regarding my concerns and symptoms of the safety recall, I left a message with a service rep explaining my issue and still have not gotten a call back over 48 hrs later. I have started a case with Nissan corporate in regards to NHTSA 26v-080, I explained that I may be experiencing limp modes. I asked if I would be getting a free loaner and I was told by corporate, that would be the dealerships decision. This is a major safety recall and the fact that corporate is telling me this is very concerning. Corporate then asked if I would like to be transferred to a dealership to make an appointment. At no point did either corporate nor the dealership tell me to stop driving and offer me a tow to the dealership. This is a huge safety liability for Nissan and I have documentation of all this. While driving it feels rough and I have had power loss and have not been able to go more than 25-26 mph until pulling over and restarting the car. These calls are on recorded lines and they failed to take this safety recall seriously after I explained my issue.
My 2022 Nissan Rogue has entered reduced-power/limp mode approximately nine times. The specific component causing the malfunction has not been identified. The vehicle is available for inspection upon request. When the malfunction occurs, the vehicle displays a malfunction/reduced-power warning and substantially reduces available engine power. Several occurrences happened during a long-distance trip involving highway, mountain, and desert driving. The unexpected reduction in power creates a safety concern during highway travel, merging, passing, climbing grades, or travel in remote areas. The problem is intermittent and has not been successfully reproduced by an authorized Nissan dealership. I presented the vehicle to a Nissan dealer and reported the repeated events while the vehicle had approximately 56,500 miles and remained below Nissan's 60,000-mile powertrain warranty mileage limit. The dealership advised that it could not diagnose the problem unless the malfunction occurs again with an active diagnostic code. I have also reported the problem to Nissan consumer affairs. The underlying cause remains unidentified and the vehicle has not been repaired for this condition. Warning messages appear when the malfunction occurs. During the long-distance trip, diagnostic codes were cleared to restore vehicle operation. The vehicle would then operate normally for a period before unexpectedly entering reduced-power mode again. My primary concern is that after approximately nine occurrences, I still have no diagnosis or assurance that the condition will not recur during highway operation or another situation where maintaining vehicle power is necessary for safe operation.
While driving on hight speed traffic Nissan Rogue cvt malfunction poped-up on info-screen and all light turn on the cluster, vehicle just allowed me to stop (not a safe area), the issue the engine would disable operation. Could not drive to a safe place the vehicle was in a highway danger zone. Until 30-40 minutes after would allow u to drive to a safe area. This is a big issue for the owners, feels like they are protecting the engine and the transmission for the dealership and forgetting the people in the vehicle for their safety. Running the risk of injuries or even death for the driver and passengers. They should allow drivability of vehicle. This rouge has on 18,000 miles.
The vehicle suddenly lost motive power due to an engine/throttle control failure consistent with defects described in NHTSA campaigns 26v081 and r25a8/r25a9/r25b1. It entered limp mode and became unable to accelerate. The vehicle is available for inspection. This created a safety risk because the vehicle was stranded in extreme heat for several hours with no access to water or shelter. I became overheated and physically distressed while waiting for assistance. Nissan would not tow the vehicle, so it sat overnight at a warehouse before eventually being transported to a dealership. A dealer confirmed the vehicle entered limp mode but did not complete the recall repair. The vehicle has now been at the dealership for four days without inspection, and I was told it should not have been towed there, so they will not prioritize it. The manufacturer cannot see the open recall because the dealer incorrectly marked it completed. Because the vehicle could not be driven and the defect has not been repaired, I was unable to travel to work and was terminated as a result. Warning lamps and messages appeared immediately before the failure, including reduced engine power and driver assist system unavailable.
'service cvt power reduced' - I have been getting this warning on and off for almost a year now. It seems to come on after the vehicle has been driving for about 30 minutes. The dealership claims they can only get a code when the warning is currently showing. And I have yet to be able to get it there while it is actively showing. I've gone there as soon as the following day and am told the codes are not stored. But I have heard otherwise. I am worried it is transmission related and I am going to go past my 60,000 mile warranty, which I am currently under. When the car is turned off for at least 5-10 minutes it seems to clear. But the issue seems to be happening more frequently. Weather does not seem to he a factor. I am in a Nissan social media page and a lot of people seem to have the same issue with this year. Most people are told the same thing. A lot of others say it is the valve body or have had to have transmissions replaced.
Formal complaint against Nissan north America regarding premature cvt transmission failure on a 2016 Nissan Rogue (VIN: [xxx], case #xxx, xxx with under 54,000 original miles. During a routine check-up, an independent mechanic scanned the vehicle and found hard codes p17f0 and p17s0, indicating severe internal cvt failure and judder defects. Following their advice, I brought the vehicle to hudson Nissan (jersey city, NJ) for official diagnosis. The dealer charged a $219. 20 diagnostic fee and confirmed total internal failure of the cvt, quoting $7,829. 88 plus taxes to replace it. On xxx, Nissan executive level denied my goodwill request, claiming the warranty expired and they "did not know the service history since 2019. " I completely reject this. I possess physical, dated service receipts from 2019 to 2026 proving the car was meticulously maintained (oil changes, alignments, fluid checks) at certified shops. I am fully prepared to upload this complete history to the bbb portal. A transmission failure at under 54k miles is unacceptable and points directly to an inherent manufacturing defect in Nissan’s jatco cvt8 systems, which is well-documented and the subject of major federal scrutiny and class-action lawsuits (e. G. , xxx v. Nissan north America). Hiding behind a chronological warranty window to evade responsibility for a known defective part on a low-mileage, well-maintained vehicle is bad-faith customer service. Desired resolution: I demand a formal re-review of case #xxx by Nissan’s corporate dispute team. Nissan must provide 100% financial coverage for the cvt transmission replacement at an authorized dealer and full reimbursement of the $219. 20 diagnostic fee. I will upload all 2019-2026 maintenance records the moment this file opens. Information redacted pursuant to the freedom of information act (foia), 5 u. S. C. 552(b)(6).