Tire Problems of Toyota Camry - part 2

This is concerning the bridgestone fusion touring tire 205/65r15-94h. We had driven our Camry to north carolina from florida and back in July or August 2015. It was very hot (in the 90's). I then drove in florida from melbourne beach to tallahassee and back in the heat again in August. My car was vibrating at over 70 miles per hour. When I took the car to my mechanic, one of the tires had shredded. In late September 2015, we drove from florida to hilton head and the car was vibrating again. We took it to a mechanic in hilton head and the belt in one of the tires had separated. Since two tires out of four have had structural problems I think these tires may have a defect or cannot withstand being driven in high temperatures and can be dangerous. I would like them looked at for recall.

See all problems of the 2005 Toyota Camry 🔎.

Side wall blow out at highway speed on michelin premier a/s tire. Nothing unusual on the road (no debris, no pot hole). Video equipment in car recorded the event. Inner side wall 3" tear (rear drivers side). 8 month old tires, 15k miles on them. Mounted on 2012 Toyota Camry.

See all problems of the 2012 Toyota Camry 🔎.

Tl- the contact owns a 2002 Toyota Camry equipped with 4 goodyear assurance comforted touring tires, dot m6uvkl1r3912, size 205/65r15. The contact stated that while driving approximately 45 mph the driver suddenly lost control of the vehicle and crashed into a barrier. While inspecting the vehicle the contact discovered that the front passenger side tire had a 3 inch crack present. The manufacturer was not notified. The failure mileage was 90,000. Jft.

See all problems of the 2002 Toyota Camry 🔎.

2007 Toyota Camry. Consumer writes in regards to right front axle and tires replaced on vehicle at low mileage.

See all problems of the 2007 Toyota Camry 🔎.

I have a 2005 Toyota Camry le, I bought goodyear assurance tires back in may 2010 as a set of 4 tires. These tires have a manufacturer warranty of 80000 miles though after driving for about 35000 miles the tire tread depth came down to below 2/32nd and the dealer denied taking the car out of dealership without a replacement or an assurance of immediate replacement. I had to replace the tire within 2 hrs after coming out of dealership as they didn't have a ready available tire from non-goodyear brand. I am wondering how this tires got down to such a low tread depth so soon? I mostly drive in the city and only few time highway that too not more than 300 miles. This certainly is the worst tires. Goodyear denied providing the warranty coverage as to do so I have to take the vehicle to their authorised shop and the dealership is not one of their authorized shop, which is surprising. Since dealer told me to replace the tire immediately, my first priority was to get new tires and with such worst experience with goodyear, I didn't wanted them again. And they will not accept their tire for warranty if they are not on the wheel. Very rediculous rules that puts greedy profit before safety! my dealer also found this odd. I want money back for almost half of the total mileage promised by goodyear but they are too corrupt and so they have NHTSA also on their side to bring anything against them.

Belts separating on tire. Normal in-city driving at 30 mph, the tire started to make very loud noise while driving, started to bounce, and car wouldn't drive straight and pushing my car into the right lane almost hitting every car passing on the right as I was trying to slow down. The belts were separating from the tire located on the right rear of the tire. This tire is an anomaly from the other tires as it had made a lot of tire noise for a few months, and had excessive wear, but firestone said it was normal and would not do anything about the tire. Note, the tires were in perfect four wheel alignment. Now that the belts are separated, firestone will not replace the manufacturing defective tire.

See all problems of the 2006 Toyota Camry 🔎.

Factory-installed tires were completely and dangerously worn thin at below 24k miles. Tire air levels routinely fell below normal but Toyota dealership (Toyota of dallas) failed to notify at regularly scheduled maintenance appointments of tire wear.

See all problems of the 2011 Toyota Camry 🔎.

Tl- the contact owns a 2011 Toyota Camry ce equipped with hankook optimo h727 tires, line size p205/65r/15. The contact stated that while traveling 60 mph the vehicle steered towards the left side of the road and smoke emitted from the passenger side rear tire. Also, the contact stated that the tread completely detached from the tire. The vehicle was not taken to the dealer. The manufacturer was made aware of the failure. The failure and current mileage was 103,000. Pmb.

3 out of the 4 pirella tires I bought were defective, tread separation.

The contact owns a 2011 Toyota Camry. The contact stated while driving approximately 40 mph, the front end of the vehicle started vibrating violently without warning. The vehicle was taken to the dealer. The technician diagnosed that the center drive shaft bearing and the tires needed to be replaced. The vehicle was repaired but the failure recurred. The manufacturer was not notified of the problem and the contact was unaware of NHTSA campaign number: 10v036000 (equipment) . The approximate failure mileage was 14,700.

I was driving in my neighborhood and notice my car flat. These were relative new tires. Found out that a tire weight puncture my tire and ruined my almost new tires. Not anything sharp. Not a nail. Not a spike but a flat weight destroyed my tire going 30 miles an hour. . Ridiculous. Contacted cooper tire and said it was not the tire debris can ruin a tire. If that the case in florida cars would be all over the place with flats. Cooper tire should have resisted the weight and only would not unless it was defective.

I bought 4 new pirelli cinturato p5 tires for my 2002 Toyota Camry in February of 2010 from discount tire. I was told that these tires they easily last for 85,000 miles before having to replace them. Since then I gone back to discount tire to have them regularly rotated and balanced. Last tire rotation was in the month of December 2011. When I went to get my tires rotated and balanced again on 3-23-2012, I was told that two of the tires are already worn out and other two are close to getting worn out and I would be better off to get new tires to keep me safe while driving. I informed the sales personnel that these tires are just two years old and with less than 27,000 miles since purchased. He mentioned to me that tires many a times do not give the mileage they are rated for. In my case, I got less than 1/3rd of the rated mileage. With my driving pattern (12,000 miles/year), I would have expected these tires to last for about six years as I take good care (rotating, balancing, and alignment) of them. With my driving pattern (12,000 miles/year), I would have expected these tires to last for about six years as I take good care (rotating, balancing, and alignment) of them.

In late 2009, I purchased a new 2010 Camry hybrid. The vehicle came with bridgestone turanza tires. I have just had to replace these tires after 2. 5 years and only 19,700 miles. The front tires were 4/32 and right at the wear mark, the rear at 6/32. The worn tire treads became evident with the first chicago snow. At 10 miles per hour, I was sliding as I drove home and, at one point, had to skid into a curb in order to stop the vehicle so as not to slide into oncoming traffic in a crowded intersection. Fortunately, there was no accident and no damage to my vehicle or other property. I contacted the dealer (from whom I purchased the car) to complain. He told me the tires were guaranteed for five years but had no estimated mileage, which is hard to believe. I also contacted another Toyota dealer and was told that these tires last no more than 25,000 miles. I spoke with a bridgestone dealer and was told 40,000 miles. I have changed the oil on my car regularly and also had my tires rotated every six months (my car has very low mileage to date). It is evident that bridgestone turanza tires do not meet even the minimum endurance requirements.

See all problems of the 2010 Toyota Camry 🔎.

2011 Toyota Camry. Consumer writes in regards to problem with vehicle tires the consumer stated while having his 25,000 mile service check-up, the dealer informed him the tires needed to be replaced. The dealer stated the tires were showing signs of wear and indicated there was tire cupping as well, which was due to the vehicle being out of alignment.

Purchased falken tires 11/15/2010. Fk ze912b at sears . All four tires were high speed balanced. Car also had wheel alignment , as of 11/25/2011 with 15,000 miles the tires are almost balded in the front and not much tread life in the rear , as per the Lincoln penny test. These tires were installed on a 2000 camery, have replaced these tires with bf goodrich advantage t/a , feel much safer. .

See all problems of the 2000 Toyota Camry 🔎.

I have a 2010 Toyota Camry. When I reached 70 mph while driving my steering wheel would vibrate very badly. When I took my car in for an oil change and tire rotation, I was told that the vibration is coming from the tires and that the steel mesh was coming through my two front tires and that if I didn't get new tires immediately it was a safety hazard and I could experience a blowout in the very near future. I ended up getting 2 new tires, and my 2 back tires will also need to be replaced soon as they were showing signs of the same problem.

Pre-mature tire wear on my2009 Toyota Camry le sedan.

See all problems of the 2009 Toyota Camry 🔎.

Car was brought in for tire noise. It was determined that the tires were wearing unevenly due to misalignment. Since the dealer did an alignment in April I felt that this was unacceptable. After complaining for about a half an hour that this was the worst Toyota I have ever bought (and I have had many). The service manager finally relented to replace all four tires and do a four wheel alignment free of charge. They said it was for "customer relations". Or perhaps to make me disappear. In any event I was pleased with the results. Only time will tell if this alignment holds.

The contact owns a 2009 Toyota Camry with bridgestone turanza el 400 tires, line size: 215/60r/16. While parked, the contact noticed the front and rear driver and passenger side tires were severally worn. The contact had the tires replaced. The dot number was not available. The approximate failure mileage was 17,000. Updated 01/20/lj.

Toyota 2008 Camry le bridgestone turanza el400 p215/60/r16 tire cupping problems. In 5000 miles cupping problems was noticeable. By 15,000 miles it was quite severe. In the 25,000 miles the cupping problem was so bad the tires had to be replaced.

See all problems of the 2008 Toyota Camry 🔎.

The contact owns a 2005 Toyota Camry. The contact stated that the vehicle had continental touring tires, line size 205/65/r15 (n/a). The tires became completely worn within 10,000 miles. The vehicle was taken to the dealer who advised that the failure was caused by the vehicle being out of alignment and the tire pressure was abnormal. The contact took the vehicle to a second dealer where the contact was advised there was nothing wrong with the vehicle and the failure was within the tires. The tire manufacturer was not contacted and the vehicle was repaired. The failure mileage was 19,999 and the current mileage 20,080.

I have a 2009 Toyota Camry le that I have owned for less than two years. Currently has less than 13,000 miles. The 40,000 mile bridgestone turanza tires, size 215/60/16 that came with this car, have worn down to 5/32 within 18 months. That is 1/2 of the tread gone. Minimal city driving with very little freeway driving. Always properly inflated and rotated every 5,000 miles . I have had to replace the tires. I did not replace them through the Toyota dealership. I purchased quality tires elsewhere. It is ridiculous that a consumer spends over $20,000 for a vehicle and must replace the tires with so few miles. After reading all of the negative reports about these tires from consumers, I did not complain to Toyota or bridgestone, because it is apparently a lost cause. I am totally disgusted with Toyota and the poor quality they have been selling over the past few years.

2010 Toyota Camry right front tire was completely worn down to the mesh, left front tire was still full of tread, advised Toyota of issue, they refused to replace. Local tire company stated this should not have occurred.

Ltr fwd on behalf of (NY) re his leased 2009 Toyota Camry le defective tires, after being driven only 25,000 miles the tires are worn, reply to massapequa park , NY ofc. The consumer stated the tires were always properly inflated and rotated. The consumer contacted bridgestone to inquire about a replacement price, but was told they could not offer any assistance because Toyota had contracted to have their automobiles equipped with lower rated mileage tires in order to achieve a higher mph.

I have a 2010 Camry le which I purchased three weeks ago. The car has bridgestone turanza el 400-02 tires, which had 689 miles on them. The rear driver side tire failed at 60 mph when the tread split. After reading all the similar complaints by other Toyota car owners, I believe these tires are dangerous. After a very ugly discussion with the dealership, the one tire was replaced, but Toyota would not replace the remaining three.

The contact owns a 2006 Toyota Camry equipped with goodyear integrity tires, p205/65/r15, dot n6urb3jr. While driving at approximately 45 mph, the tread delaminated and separated, causing the front passenger tire to go flat. The remaining tread depth was â½ inch. The contact stated that he had not drive over any potholes or anything that could have caused the tire to become flat. The mileage on the vehicle when it was purchased was 65,326. The current mileage was approximately 100,000.

Email from the office of congressman on behalf of constituent re acceleration problems in Toyota Camry models. The consumer stated the recall was performed on Feb 5, 2010 regarding the sudden acceleration problem. However, on March 25, 2010 as the consumer removed the gear from park to drive, with his foot on the brake, the vehicle began to accelerate and roar, the rpm's had redlined and the vehicle began to move forward and the brakes would not stop the vehicle from moving forward. The consumer put the gear in neutral and the vehicle was still accelerating. The consumer then immediately shifted the gear into park and the vehicle came to a screeching halt. The consumer took the vehicle to the dealer for an inspection. However, the inspection revealed nothing wrong with the vehicle. Also, the tires had to be replaced due to excess wear, despite the tire rotations that were performed every 5,000.

I have Toyota Camry 2006 in which there are good year integrity tires with defects. It seems that a little of water on the roads the tires make the car to loose control.

I bought a brand new 2010 Camry le (4 cylinder), and it has already been through the set of factory-installed tires, another set of four michelin tires, a third set of four, and 2 more tires as of 10/27/2013, although the vehicle only now has approximately 74,000 miles on it. The tires curiously go uniformly bald on the front in less than 1/3rd of the life of the tire. Each company from which I have purchased new michelin or bfgoodrich tires for this Camry said this is highly unusual. They stated that the tires should not ordinarily be uniformly bald or be worn out so quickly. They have also stated that the vehicle must have come out of the factory aligned this way, since the first pair was useless after so few miles and the new tires are wearing out so quickly. Moreover, there are electrical problems with the ac system controls and the sensor on the driver's side power window. The ac mysteriously turns its recycled air switch from recycled to vent (without being pressed to make the switch) while driving. Also, the driver's side power window will go nearly all the way up (when pressed), but it stops short of the top and then rolls itself back down. The service manager at robbin's Toyota said his mechanics could not get these problems to re-occur when driven, and therefore, he could not and would not fix the two issues, although the vehicle was under warranty at the time. Finally, I cannot remove the oil filter canister for a home-oil change. I've used the oem filter cap wrench, but I am unable to get the canister housing to turn, which makes it impossible to change the oil filter at home. This was the first Toyota I've owned, and it will be the last.

I have a 2009 Toyota Camry. Just after 20,000 miles, tires are worn-out. The dealer who sold me the new car asked me to change tires. I bought this car less than 2 years (a brand new car at that time). If tires can last only 20,000 miles, these tires (on camry) must be poor quality. I think Toyota must recall to fix this problem because this could put driver/passengers at risk.

My 2008 Toyota Camry le tires are going balled after only 18000 miles on it which is becoming extremely dangerous to handle the car in wet weather.

I have a 2008 Toyota Camry le which was purchased in oct 2007. The car currently has 22241 miles. It has had mainly highway miles (about 20miles) a day and already in two years, the tires (bridgestone turanza el400-02) size 215/60/16 have almost no tire tread left. The usual warranty on these tires should be 50k miles. Contacted both Toyota and bridgestone and nobody is willing to help out. Several complaints on all forums regarding this tire can be found online, but still both companies are playing the blame game, bridgestone and Toyota know that they have been using these sub-standard parts. I will have to now replace the tires and pay out of my pocket for something which a new car owner should not (so early in the cars life), else it is a safety hazard on the road. I hope this complaint is looked into (several other complaints on forums) and not ignored. Both Toyota and bridgestone need to stop cheating and putting customers in danger.

Brand new 2009 Toyota Camry with 22,557 miles on it was forced to replace one tire. The tire began repeatedly losing air three months prior to replacing it. 6/26/10 I purchased 3 more new tires because they didn't meet safety inspection requirements and were losing air. We were putting air in the tire 2-3x weekly. We had to replace all four tires by 30,000 miles and we waited much longer than we should have. It is ridiculous to pay 30k for a car and need new tires before 2 years. I am very disgusted with Toyota. It is a safety risk to drivers and their families. The tires a poor quality.

The contact owns a 2009 Toyota Camry with bridgestone turanza el 400 p215/60r/16 tires. While driving approximately 5 mph making a left turn with snow weather conditions the tires started spinning making it difficult to turn. The vehicle was taken to the dealer where the technicians stated to contact the tire manufacturer. The tire manufacturer was contacted and stated that Toyota needed to be contacted since the vehicle was unsafe to drive. The contact stated that the tires failed prematurely. The tires have not been replaced. The failure mileage was 11,000.

The contact owns a 1997 Toyota Camry with goodyear kelly navigator gold tires. The tire size was p195/70/r14 and the dot number was m7rw17kr2407. While driving at any speed, the contact stated that the front driver side of the vehicle vibrates, causing the steering wheel to shake excessively. When the driver side window was open, the contact heard a squishing noise and noticed that the belt separated within the tire. The dealer and manufacturer were notified and offered to prorate the price towards the purchase of new tires. The tires were replaced. The current mileage was approximately 20,000. The failure mileage was approximately 15,000. The VIN was unavailable.

See all problems of the 1997 Toyota Camry 🔎.