Engine And Engine Cooling Problems of Nissan Rogue - part 1

When changing my oil, the brass insert that connects to the oil drip pan fell out with the cap, with little effort.

See all problems of the 2023 Nissan Rogue 🔎.

The front and back collision warning system lights are on indicating that they are not working, this is a Nissan 2025 rouge sv, they turned on when accelerating from stop and now I have lost my turbo pressure (won't go over 0), and when in park it revs up and down without my input. Accelerating from stop turns car into limp mode.

See all problems of the 2025 Nissan Rogue 🔎.

Failed components: engine valvetrain, powertrain/transmission, and electronic throttle control, directly linked to open federal safety recalls NHTSA 26v-080 and 26v-081. Safety risk: the vehicle was sold cpo by downey Nissan with unaddressed safety recalls. It suffers from severe engine vibration, a sharp mechanical valvetrain ticking noise, a persistent burning odor, and catastrophic transmission gear slippage that abruptly drops out of gear and slams back into drive mid-turn, creating an extreme collision hazard in traffic.

Vehicle: 2025 Nissan Rogue (1. 5l 3-cylinder vc-turbo engine) approximate mileage: about 23,600 miles failure date: September 25, 2026 incident description: while operating my vehicle on September 24, the cabin climate control system suddenly stopped producing heat and began blowing exclusively cool air. The following day, while accelerating onto the freeway to merge into high-speed active traffic, a massive column of thick white smoke violently billowed out from the vehicle exhaust so thick I could not see vehicles around me. Concurrently, the engine temperature gauge spiked aggressively into the extreme hot/danger zone before erratically fluctuating back toward the normal range. Immediately following the temperature spike, the vehicle lost reliable acceleration, began severely lunging, jerking, and lost normal throttle response. The dashboard illuminated multiple critical malfunction alerts, specifically identifying a failure in the emission control system and the automatic start-stop system warning. Safety risk statement: the sudden powertrain failure and severe engine lunging occurred at highway speeds (65-70 mph) on a major freeway I-35, resulting in an immediate and hazardous drop in speed. As the vehicle slowed down rapidly in active traffic, I was forced to maneuver a failing vehicle across two active lanes of high-speed traffic and cut directly across a freeway on-ramp with a failing throttle to reach the safety of the shoulder, where I awaited a tow truck. This defect presents an immediate, catastrophic collision hazard. The manufacturer has expanding recalls on this specific vc-turbo engine family, but claims my specific VIN is not currently covered. There were no warning indicators prior to the failure. Elevated Nissan in merriam kansas has the vehicle and is evaluating it.

On Thursday, xxx at 14:44 pm while driving on route 202 in [xxx], the car made a loud popping sound from under the hood, followed by other metallic sounds, then all dashboard warning indicator lights flashed & the accelerator stoped working. As the car was being steered to the shoulder, a huge plume of black smoke rose from under the hood followed by a roaring fire ?? from under the hood. As per our written correspondence to usaa, our insurance company is conducting a forensic cause/analysis. We have no definitive causation determination as of this writing. The car is available for inspection at the police private towing facility. The police & fire department closed route 202 to battle the car fire. No dealer has examined the car remains, to our knowledge, as of yet. The warning lights appeared almost simultaneously as the loud popping sound and other under hood metallic sounds. The insurance company said they will conduct a forensic source /cause analysis investigation. We will report this car fire next to Nissan consumer safety and both organizations can coordinate investigations, as far as we anticipate. Not applicable regarding reproducing the massive car car. Information redacted pursuant to the freedom of information act (foia), 5 u. S. C. 552(b)(6).

See all problems of the 2020 Nissan Rogue 🔎.

My 2022 Nissan rouge lost power and engine light came on said I engine needs servicing I drove it to dealership they want to charge me 7300 to fix both cats and sensors. I asked about the recall on the kg bearing. The said the updated the program but my vehicle is now totally clogged and wont drive. There is a refusal to complete the NHTSA recall no. : 25v437. As stated in the recall: description of remedy program: dealers will inspect the engine oil pan for the presence of specific metal debris. This inspection will be performed free of charge for parts and labor and should take less than one (1. 0) hour to complete. • for customers with the 3-cylinder 1. 5l vc-turbo engine, if no debris is detected during the inspection, dealers will replace the oil pan gasket, engine oil, and reprogram the vehicle’s engine control module (ecm). This repair will be performed free of charge for parts and labor and should take less than half of one (0. 5) hour to complete. The dealer refuses to drop the oil pan and wants payment for it and the oil! I have spent about $1000 so far on a rental because dealer claims they don't do that either. I need help getting this taking care of. Thank you.

See all problems of the 2022 Nissan Rogue 🔎.

I was driving at soscol Ave napa 94558 CA when engine warning came out and vehicle power reduced to less than 40mph on 55mph road. Component failure was engine. My safety and others may or may not be at risk but the road was 55mph and the vehicle went on limp mode. Problems were raised to napa Nissan dealership @1:50pm on 09/21/2026 however similar problems are reported with the same vehicle nationwide. Vehicle still in dealership possession and conducting their own inspection as of this writing. Warning lights and messages appears while driving around 6:30am napa California engine malfunction and I think it went to limp mode it’s having a hard time going 30-40mph. I was on the way to work when it happened this morning around 6:30am @ 50,394 mls the engine malfunction error went off, and the engine sounds were different than usual and power was reduced. Also the driver seats feels not sturdy and squeaking a lot when driving. I have video documenting it and how it’s sounds like.

While driving the start/stop fault popped up then the forward collision warning, automatic emergency braking, parking collision warning malfunctioned. The vehicle also lost power when accelerating, rpm would go high but vehicle wouldn’t go any faster. Engine light came on. Had it scanned codes p0196 (engine oil temperature sensor ‘a’ range/performance) & p0507 (idle control system rpm-higher than expected). Fuel consumption goes fast.

Driving home from the store on 9/19/2026, the car completely lost power while going 45 mph. Was able to restart the vehicle and made it home.

September 15, 2026. Driving and car engine was sluggish and car wouldn't move. Red oil light came on. Managed to get the car to a parking spot and let the car cool off. Checked the oil and it was low, so put more oil in. Will follow up with mechanic but can't understand why I've not gotten a recall notice when there have been many of these same complaints!! now I am afraid to drive the car! 2023 Nissan Rogue sv.

It is 15 September 2026; but back in June time frame 2026 an engine recall was called for my 2024 Nissan rouge. Dangerous to the point that car would shut down or burst into flame with not warnings while operating the vehicle on the road and at all speeds - hgwy. Nissans consumer affairs division discussed this in chat rooms with owners of the year vehicles 2023 - 2025? effected that when the engine is replaced you must address and change out the transmission. The vehicle is built on vct technology - variable compression technology??. The replacement engine is so robust and apparently stronger than ome - original manufacture equipment that marrying it with the ome transmission in a short period of time the engine would destroy the trans. Today only a few short months later at 5 am traveling on rt78 at max speed the trans went into limp mode. Limp mode is Nissan's reference terminology I took it to the dealership where I leased it - and changed out the engine and married the anticipated trans failure - it was only a matter of time - it failed, the vehicle lost power, steering failed the car from 71 mph quickly slowed would not go any further it dropped speed so fast it was almost hit from behind by a tractor trailer - Nissan's consumer affairs division full well knows of the combination repair issues and now the dealership I brought it to, scanned the truck confirmed my worst nightmare was true that after they replaced the engine on recall and tried to tip-toe away from a trans replacement the engine destroyed the trans and my wife was in grave danger they expect us to pay $ 2,200. 00 to replace the trans - they are refusing to pay for the replacment caused by them ignoring responsibility. We want out of this lease expunge the lease agreement and step back from demands of excessive $ for high milage take the vehicle back and put us into a new vehicle - "lemon law' recall not rectified and lives are at risk - contact me please 484 425 0453 rob monty - urgent!!.

See all problems of the 2024 Nissan Rogue 🔎.

The defect: my 2023 Nissan Rogue awd equipped with 1. 5l 3 cylinder vc turbo engine began making growling,, shaking noises matching the symptoms of known engine main bearing failures as outlined in NHTSA recall 25v437/26v080 (r25e2). This happened with only about 44,000 miles on my vehicle. I brought it in to oak ridge Nissan under the recall on September 22, 2026. . I was expecting them to check the oil pan for any metallic debris or further related problems. The service mechanic noted: "reprogram ecm and complete test drive with no dtc po524 present. Good condition r25e20 0. 9. " the mechanic also noted "transmission mounts. Just the one vibrating badly possible motor mount also but would need tostart with trans mount. " (which they listed as a $1,146. 76 expense. ) I was told this is my responsibility but it is not usual for a car with 44,000 to have this kind of problem. I don't feel they inspected this problem in a sufficient professional manner. Warning safety problem: the car had a engine malfunction when I brought it in. It now reads awd malfunction the nature of this engine sound, awd warning, and "auto start/stop dashboard warning,, and recalled problem render this vehicle unsafe to drive. I have owned three other Nissans over the years and this one is the most problematic - it should not have this kind of problem at such low mileage.

I am filing this complaint regarding my 2023 Nissan Rogue due to a serious engine malfunction and concerns that a safety recall may not have been properly completed. My vehicle developed an “engine malfunction” warning with reduced power and became unsafe and undrivable. The vehicle had to be towed to a repair facility. An independent diagnostic performed afterward indicated a possible throttle body issue. Prior to this incident, I took the vehicle to a Nissan dealership because of an applicable recall. The dealership told me that the recall had been repaired. However, when I checked the vehicle’s recall status afterward, the recall still appeared as unrepaired/incomplete. I also was not provided adequate documentation explaining exactly what was inspected, what was repaired, or how the dealership determined that the recall was successfully completed. I am concerned that the recall-related defect may not have been properly addressed and that this could have contributed to the engine malfunction and sudden loss of power. I am requesting that NHTSA review this matter and determine whether there are other complaints involving this recall, the 2023 Nissan Rogue, loss of power/engine malfunction, or throttle-body-related problems, and whether the recall remedy is being properly performed. I can provide repair records, diagnostic information, photographs, recall information, and documentation from the Nissan dealership if needed.

Incident summary & safety hazard: Nissan north America and its dealership failed to perform a timely safety recall repair (NHTSA 25v-437 / 26v-080), resulting in complete engine failure and sudden loss of power in active traffic. Essential replacement parts are on national backorder, leaving the vehicle inoperable. Timeline: June–late 2025 (~105k miles): attempted to get the recall repair at tom peacock Nissan 3–4 times. Turned away each time due to lack of parts/remedy. Jan 2026 (~121k miles): engine lost power and made severe internal noise while driving. Dealer reflashed ecm and used a borescope, claiming a metal piece on a piston was "unrelated to the recall. " they refused to inspect the bearings per protocol and demanded $8,000 for repair without a diagnostic breakdown. Sept 2026: total engine failure while driving; vehicle stalled completely. An independent shop confirmed failure due to progressive bearing wear linked to the recalled defect. Nissan refused coverage because mileage passed 120,000 miles, despite repeated pre-failure recall attempts starting at 105,000 miles. Current status: purchased a replacement engine out-of-pocket (Nissan order #180929 and #181725). Parts are on national backorder with no estimated delivery date. Requested action: I request NHTSA investigate Nissan's failure to supply timely recall remedies, turning away owners prior to failure, and denying coverage for damages caused by known defective engine bearings.

While driving on a major public highway, the vehicle suffered a sudden, catastrophic loss of motive propulsion, dropping immediately into a dangerous transmission limp mode. The dashboard displayed a critical error message stating 'service cvt power reduced' alongside a check engine light. The vehicle became an immediate stationary traffic hazard in a live highway lane, completely unable to accelerate or move safely out of the way of oncoming high-speed traffic. The hazard was severe enough to require an emergency safety response from the gwinnett county police department (case #pd262540884) to secure the scene and protect the disabled vehicle until a flatbed tow truck could remove it. A subsequent diagnostic scan by a certified corporate dealer (premier Nissan) confirmed complete internal transaxle failure, throwing diagnostic trouble codes p0741-00 (torque converter), p0746-00, and p187e-09.

The specific defect: my vehicle has two active federal safety recalls: NHTSA campaign 26v080 (internal engine bearing failure causing a severe knock) and NHTSA campaign 26v081 (electronic throttle body malfunction). The dealer violations: Nissan mcdonough officially diagnosed the engine as faulty but refused to execute the free engine replacement under the campaign. Nissan south morrow attempted to charge me retail out-of-pocket prices for the recalled throttle body, they did not replace it, they only conducted the omc (?) the service manager explicitly refused the recall by claiming a code for a "throttle valve door" is not covered under the throttle body assembly campaign. Federal law explicitly mandates that when an active safety recall is present, manufacturers and their franchise dealers must complete the repair without charge and frame. I used my rouge for my courier services and I am contract by two companies aerospace and airspace and I am in danger of losing my contacts. I have lost 10 days of wages thus far. Can you please assist me.

Reported emc control issue 12/25 turned out to be a recall of trottle contol system . Dealership took vehicle and completed repair. September 26 issue occurred again . Very dangerous situations in both circumstances as the vehicle loses power and has no acceleration. September 2026 on a major 3 lane interstate vehicles traveling over 65mph vehicle dead in left hand lane . Psp state police called to scene as well as tow agency.

When starting the car a warning ?? light comes on. Engine malfunction power reduction service now so the car will not gain speed. I can turn the car off and restart an the light goes off. But will come back on in a couple of days.

While driving at speed with a newborn infant in the vehicle, my 2023 Nissan Rogue suffered a sudden and catastrophic engine failure related to NHTSA recall 26v080000. The vehicle suddenly produced a heavy burning smell, thick white smoke, and the engine completely seized and died while actively in motion. This resulted in an immediate, terrifying loss of motive power on a live roadway, trapping myself and my infant in a hazardous situation. The violent, sudden engine seizure also delivered a terminal mechanical shock that destroyed the transmission. Nissan is currently refusing 100% accountability, trying to charge me a 30% split for the transmission damage directly caused by this life-threatening defect.

Engine failure- my car goes into engine failure when I am driving it.

My engine light randomly came on with a bunch of other things and my car lost power in acceleration and can barely maintain a speed of 50 mph. Code p0196 popped up and I wanna know if it’s the sensor or the water valve. We brought the car in 3 times to a Nissan dealership and they still haven’t fixed it.

The contact owns a 2014 Nissan Rogue. The contact stated that while driving approximately 15 mph, the brake pedal was depressed and the vehicle shut off unexpectedly. The vehicle was restarted, and moments later there were two popping sounds coming from underneath the vehicle before the vehicle unexpectedly decelerated and was parked. The contact exited the vehicle to inspect the vehicle and discovered smoke and flames coming from underneath the middle of the vehicle. The fire department was immediately called to the vehicle scene, and moments later the smoke and flames were coming from underneath the hood of the vehicle. The flames were extinguished. A police report was filed at the scene, and the vehicle was towed to the residence. The cause of the failure was not yet determined. The failure mileage was 235,000.

See all problems of the 2014 Nissan Rogue 🔎.

On August 31, 2026, my 2023 Nissan Rogue suffered a total structural failure of the factory plastic engine oil pan. During a routine maintenance check, the internal pressed-in brass threaded insert completely separated from the composite plastic casing and began spinning freely. This design failure made it impossible to safely remove, secure, or torque the oil drain plug to factory specifications. Nissan has documented this exact engineering defect in technical service bulletin TSB ntb22-003. The failure occurs under normal operating force due to an inadequate layer of composite material holding the metal insert in place. The repair facility (jiffy lube) officially certified on the repair invoice that this failure was caused entirely by a "factory design flaw," completely ruling out technician error or external road damage. I was forced to pay $778. 25 out of pocket to replace the failed factory assembly to ensure the vehicle was safe to operate.

The contact owns a 2023 Nissan Rogue. The contact stated that while approaching a stop light, the vehicle unexpectedly lunged forward. The contact stated that while pulling into the residence, there was an abnormal sound coming from the vehicle, before the vehicle lost motive power. The vehicle failed to immediately restart but restarted after a while. The vehicle was taken to a service center, and the contact was informed that the failure was associated with the engine. The contact was referred to a dealer for assistance. The manufacturer was made aware of the failure by telephone. The approximate failure mileage was 63,411.

My 2022 Nissan Rogue 1. 5l vc-turbo is experiencing repeated limp-mode/reduced-power events, severe hesitation, poor acceleration, rough/shaking idle, and recurring dtc u0652 after Nissan marked recall 25v-437 complete. The vehicle is available for inspection. Reduced-power symptoms were documented as early as Dec. 2024 and significantly worsened by oct. 3, 2025 at approximately 100,400 miles, including loss of power at highway speed. I previously reported this condition to NHTSA under complaint #11696068. The first Nissan dealer (willis) used a borescope, claimed “sludge,” recommended engine replacement, refused to provide supporting photos/evidence, and did not remove the oil pan. Willis later provided me an oil sample, which I submitted for independent analysis. That analysis showed multiple bearing-associated wear metals without an abnormal viscosity condition explaining the findings, and confirmed the oil pan was had not been checked. A second Nissan dealer was contacted to performed Nissan’s recall screening/software procedure. No engine light could be on upon arrival. Because the intermittent condition did not occur during the brief test, Nissan marked the recall complete. The warning light is now illuminated again and the vehicle is again entering limp mode/reduced power. I contacted Nissan for assistance and was told they would not provide towing or further recall assistance because the recall is listed as complete. I am currently stranded with the same safety condition after Nissan declared the vehicle remedied. My complaint is failed recall remedy/recall effectiveness. Nissan’s screening process classified this vehicle as remedied, but the safety condition continues and appears progressive. Nissan is now using its own “recall complete” status to refuse further action despite recurring loss of power and independent evidence of internal engine wear.

The contact owns a 2024 Nissan Rogue. The contact stated while driving at approximately 53 mph, the vehicle intermittently stalled. The messages "engine malfunction. Power reduce. Service now" and the "start/stop system fault. Idle stop system" were displayed on the instrument panel, and the check engine warning light was illuminated. The vehicle was taken back to the residence. The vehicle was not diagnosed or repaired. The manufacturer was not notified of the failure. The failure mileage was approximately 59,267.

The contact owns a 2023 Nissan Rogue. The contact stated that after the son started the vehicle, white exhaust smoke suddenly emerged from the engine compartment and entered the vehicle's cabin. The engine was turned off, and the vehicle was towed to a dealer. The dealer diagnosed that the engine had sustained a catastrophic failure; however, the cause of the failure had not been determined. The contact was informed that the engine needed to be replaced or rebuilt. The vehicle was not repaired. The manufacturer was notified of the failure, but no assistance was provided. The failure mileage was 98,000.

The engine failed, and yes its available for inspection, my safety was put at risk due to the white billowing smoke out the exhaust and the smell entering in the vehicle while driving down the interstate, I proceeded to pull off onto an exit and stop at a red light and my car made me put into park and then proceeded to not crank or move other then neutral, the problem was originally part of an active recall of r25d10 reprogramming the ecm, and p4a470 replacing the turbo hose. I originally brought my vehicle to Nissan dealership to have those fixed on February 6th 2026. However after finding that my vehicle ended up with low oil and dried my entire system of coolant, and then proceeded to turn off in traffic on August 22nd 2026, I became aware of an extended recall that did not notify me or my specific VIN yet in the system, however the recall had been upgraded since February 11th 2026. The only warning lights were saying I needed an oil change soon, the check service warning, and the coolant temperature gauge getting hot when my engine was needing to drive, and before shutting off the car told me to put into park, pressing on the gas would not move the car. The new recall codes are r25e2, and r25e3?.

I turned on my car and it started smoking. (white smoke out of the exhaust). I decided to drive it to the nearest Nissan dealership (approximately 4. 7 miles). I noticed a sputtering and loss of power while driving. Approximately 3 miles into the drive, the check engine light and see owner’s manual warning popped up on the dash. I noticed the engine temperature was really high, and I noticed a dramatic loss of power. I turned on my hazards and I pulled into auto zone which was along the route. I put coolant into it and the engine began struggling to even start. I got it started and attempted to drive the remaining mile to the dealership. I wasn’t able to get enough power to enter traffic safely. I reversed by putting it in neutral. I then called a tow truck and had it towed to the dealership.

On xxx at approx 1:29 pm, I was driving my 2023 Nissan Rogue (purchased new xxx chapman Nissan philadelphia) on [xxx] with my family including 2 young children and my brother-in- law, heading to [xxx]. At highway speed (~65 mph), "service cvt power reduced" warning appeared, complete loss of acceleration. I had to press accelerator to floor to avoid crash. I managed to drive approx 1 mile to emergency stop at [xxx] fenimore cooper service area, [xxx]. My family with 2 young children was terrified, we had to stop and rest in service area. This could have caused fatal crash - trucks behind me at 70 mph, no power, no way to accelerate. If I could not reach service area, we would have been rear-ended at high speed with 2 children in car. This is not just breakdown, this is life-threatening defect. Prior:xxx 27,756 mi cvt warning photo, xxx 28,024 mi cvt warning photo - went to [xxx] Nissan front desk, showed photo, refused repair, said "bring it when light is on" no ro 08/21/2026 highway failure with family including 2 children. Repair 08/22/2026 ro xxx [xxx] Nissan "safety repairs" valve body back order + water pump. Please investigate - next family with children may not be lucky information redacted pursuant to the freedom of information act (foia), 5 u. S. C. 552(b)(6).

I am filing this complaint regarding Nissan's handling of an open safety recall involving my vehicle and the subsequent engine failure. Nissan issued recall 26v080 concerning an engine-related defect that can cause engine oil breakdown, bearing damage/seizure, engine damage, and loss of motive power. My vehicle developed the red oil warning light, check-engine light, and reduced engine power before the engine failed. The vehicle also had dark oil and sludge in the engine. The dealership is now attributing the engine failure to alleged lack of maintenance and has denied the engine warranty claim. This is disputed. The vehicle received oil changes at an independent repair facility, and I provided Nissan with receipts documenting the maintenance. The dealership originally relied on the absence of carfax entries to claim that the oil changes had not occurred. The dealership inspected the vehicle and submitted photographs and a physical sludge sample to Nissan's warranty department. I was told that Nissan's warranty department responded approximately three days later. No Nissan warranty technician or field representative physically inspected my vehicle before the determination was made. Nissan consumer affairs told me that the dealership's warranty department made the determination and that they would not disclose what information was submitted or what the sludge sample established. I dispute the conclusion that maintenance caused the engine failure. The presence of sludge does not, by itself, establish what caused the sludge. Nissan's own recall documentation identifies oil breakdown as part of the defect's failure mechanism. I have not been provided with evidence explaining how Nissan distinguished maintenance-related oil degradation from the recalled defect or how it ruled out the recalled defect as a cause or contributing factor. I was also told that the recall cannot be performed because my engine is no longer operational and that I would have to obtain another.

The contact owns a 2024 Nissan Rogue. The contact received notification of NHTSA campaign number: 26v0801000 (fuel system, gasoline, engine and engine cooling); however, the part to do the recall repair was not yet available, even though the notification stated that the parts were available. The contact stated that the vehicle had experienced several issues, including the loss of motive power and engine shut-off as stated in the recall notification. The local dealer was contacted and stated there was no such recall. The contact stated that the manufacturer had exceeded a reasonable amount of time for the recall repair. The manufacturer was made aware of the issue but stated that the recall did not exist. The failure mileage was 95,000.

The vehicle experienced a catastrophic engine/motor failure. The engine became extremely loud/rattled and subsequently locked up, causing the vehicle to lose the ability to operate. The vehicle is currently being held for diagnosis/repair and should be available for inspection upon request. The vehicle experienced the failure while I was driving and left me stranded on a mountain. The vehicle lost its ability to operate, creating a significant safety risk because I was left stopped and without reliable transportation. A sudden engine failure while driving could also create a traffic hazard for the occupants and other motorists. Yes. The vehicle has been taken to a Nissan dealership for diagnosis following the failure. The vehicle experienced a catastrophic engine failure/lock-up. I am requesting the dealership’s written diagnostic report and confirmation of the exact failed component. The vehicle has been presented to Nissan for inspection and diagnosis. Nissan is currently involved in determining the cause of the engine failure. There has not been a police inspection that I am aware of. I am requesting that Nissan preserve and provide all diagnostic findings, photographs, technician notes, and repair records. Prior to the failure, the vehicle began exhibiting abnormal engine symptoms, including a loud/rattling engine noise and difficulty operating normally. The symptoms occurred shortly before the catastrophic failure on August 14, 2026. The vehicle subsequently became inoperable when the engine locked up. I am requesting the dealer’s diagnostic scan to determine whether any warning codes or messages were stored before or during the failure.

Complaint description: on xxx, my 2021 Nissan Rogue would not start due to a busted engine block, rendering the vehicle inoperable. The vehicle was serviced exclusively at kraft Nissan in [xxx], from the time of purchase until approximately one year prior to the failure, following the manufacturer’s recommended maintenance schedule. I contacted Nissan regarding the engine bearing recall affecting 2021-2024 Rogue vehicles equipped with the vc-turbo engine (Nissan recall numbers r25a8/a9 and r25b1/b2), which addresses bearing failures that can breach the engine block and increase the risk of engine fire. I was informed that my VIN is not included in this recall campaign, despite my vehicle being the same model year and equipped with the same engine type, and despite experiencing symptoms consistent with the defect described in the recall (engine block failure). My vehicle remains undrivable due to this engine failure. I am requesting that NHTSA investigate whether additional vehicles, including mine, should be included in this recall campaign based on the described defect and failure pattern. Date of failure: xxx dealer: kraft Nissan, [xxx] owner information: [xxx] contact info: [xxx] information redacted pursuant to the freedom of information act (foia), 5 u. S. C. 552(b)(6).

See all problems of the 2021 Nissan Rogue 🔎.

The contact owns a 2022 Nissan Rogue. The contact stated that while driving 65-75 mph and depressing the accelerator pedal, the vehicle experienced reduced power and failed to exceed 30-35 mph. Several unknown warning lights were illuminated. The contact pulled over to the side of the road and notified the dealer of the failure by phone. The contact associated the failure with NHTSA campaign number: 25v437000 (engine and engine cooling). The vehicle was taken to a dealer, where it was diagnosed and dtc: p0012 and p0196 were retrieved, and the contact was advised that the engine was overheating. The contact was informed that the failures associated with the diagnostic trouble codes needed to be fixed prior to the recall repair. The contact declined to pay for the repair. The vehicle was taken to an independent mechanic, where the cooling system was replaced. The vehicle was then taken to cannon Nissan eastern shore (29788 frederick blvd, daphne, al 36526), where the contact was informed that the vehicle needed to be diagnosed prior to the recall repair. The contact declined to pay for the diagnostic test because the vehicle had previously been diagnosed with the same trouble codes by the first dealer and o'reilly auto parts. The manufacturer was notified of the failure by phone and informed the contact that the recall did not apply to the vehicle. The failure mileage was approximately 102,801.