Structure Problems in popular cars
Structure problem is a common vehicle problem that happens to most car brands and models. The following is a sample list of Structure problems reported in most popular vehicles.
Structure problem of Chevrolet Tahoe
The car was a 2007 Chevrolet Tahoe. The vehicle identification number (VIN) is 1GNFC13J87_. I got into my car at 1pm and found a crack above the instrument panel and another where the airbag should deploy on the dashboard. It was 01/24/14 when this structure issue occurred.
See
all problems of Chevrolet Tahoe and
all Structure problems of Chevrolet Tahoe.
Structure problem of Chevrolet Silverado
The vehicle having this issue was a 2004 Chevrolet Silverado. The VIN of this Silverado is 1GCEK14V74_. All my lines under truck rusted out brake lines shift linkage transmission lines. Brakes were the worst lines popped from rust. I keep this truck in a garage not used commercially. I'm a hospice nurse and need to get where I'm going. I keep this truck mint detailed twice a year professionally maintained every 3000 miles. [xxx] information redacted pursuant to the freedom of information act (foia), 5 u. S. C. 552(b)(6). The failure date was Tuesday, Feb. 14, 2012.
See
all problems of Chevrolet Silverado and
all Structure problems of Chevrolet Silverado.
Structure problem of Chrysler Crossfire
The vehicle is a 2005 Chrysler Crossfire roadster. The vehicle identification number (VIN) of the car was 1C3AN65L65_. Rear window detached. Nhtsa has Chrysler TSB on file for same exact defect, issued by Chrysler in 2011, specifying 10 year/100,000 mile warranty extension. Chrysler restricts their remedy to only vehicles first sold in alabama, florida, georgia, louisiana, missouri, north carolina, south carolina, tennessee, and texas, despite the fact that all of these cars were imported from the same source at the same time. There is no difference in the product defect that has occurred nationwide. The NHTSA must force Chrysler to help all affected owners! what Chrysler is doing is just so wrong! please help us! updated 05/12/14. It was 05/25/2013 when this structure issue occurred.
See
all problems of Chrysler Crossfire and
all Structure problems of Chrysler Crossfire.
Structure problem of Chrysler Crossfire
The car involved is a 2005 Chrysler Crossfire roadster. Rear window became completely detached (loose) from the mounting surface. Having the Chrysler group service bulletin (23035-11 rev a) on file, which specifies a 10yr/100,000 mi. Warranty extension (2005 model) along with an ample amount of evidence that this defect has occurred in all regions of the u. S. , to a vehicle that was imported from only one source in germany; why has the NHTSA failed to require the Chrysler group to cover all of the affected vehicles regardless of which state they were first sold in???. This structure issue occurred May. 19, 2013.
See
all problems of Chrysler Crossfire and
all Structure problems of Chrysler Crossfire.
Structure problem of Dodge Ram 2500
The vehicle was a 2001 Dodge Ram 2500. The dashboard started to disintegrate almost immediately after purchase. At 70,000 miles it had opened up a giant sinkhole and started causing electrical shortages, like headlights going out occasionally while driving. Now every time the fan is run, small pieces fly around the cab. A piece got into my eye while driving, it was a bad situation. I had to be treated with antibiotics in eye for a cut. Now I am seriously concerned for my safety in the event the airbags deploy. Sharp shards of shrapnel could be forced into my body by the airbag deploying. It is a very unsafe situation for driver and passenger. I am having the whole dash replaced at my own cost because of this. Dodge refuses to help. Unfortunately my mechanic says he replaces these all the time because of this issue, but in two years new dash is disintegrating again. This is clearly an unsafe situation that needs to be dealt with, before fatalities occur. This issue happened on 11/14/2012.
See
all problems of Dodge Ram 2500 and
all Structure problems of Dodge Ram 2500.
Structure problem of Dodge Ram 2500
The vehicle is a 2001 Dodge Ram 2500. The dashboard in this vehicle started to disintegrate at about 70,000 miles, even though it had a dash cover and window sun protection in at all times, since purchase of the vehicle. It was like a sinkhole opening up in dash. It is now causing wiring problems to the point I have it in the shop. Called Dodge to see if there is a recall as the mechanic said he has the same truck, with same issue, and every Dodge 2001 truck he works on has the same issue. Dodge would not comment. I have a Dodge Ram 2500 1992, and the dash looks like new. It is a defect that needs to be recalled. It can cause the headlights to short out while driving. This structure problem happened on Dec. 11, 2012.
See
all problems of Dodge Ram 2500 and
all Structure problems of Dodge Ram 2500.
Structure problem of Ford Escape Hybrid
The vehicle involved is a 2005 Ford Escape Hybrid. The contact stated while driving approximately 55 mph over a bump, a loud clanking noise emitted from outside of the vehicle. The contact inspected the vehicle and noticed that the rear passenger's side wheel well inner liner was rusted. The vehicle had not been repaired. The manufacturer was not notified of the failure. The approximate failure mileage was 130,000. The VIN was unavailable. The failure date was Wednesday, April 30, 2014.
See
all problems of Ford Escape Hybrid and
all Structure problems of Ford Escape Hybrid.
Structure problem of Ford Escape
The vehicle was a 2005 Ford Escape. The contact stated that the rear passenger side shock absorber became detached. Upon inspection, it was found that the frame was perforated due to rust. The vehicle was not diagnosed or repaired. The VIN was not available. The manufacturer was notified of the failure. The approximate failure mileage was not available. This issue happened on 04/28/14.
See
all problems of Ford Escape and
all Structure problems of Ford Escape.
Structure problem of GMC Sierra
The vehicle is a 2009 GMC Sierra. The VIN of the car is 1GTHK63659_. 3 cracks appeared in the top of the dash. One 2" long running from the air bag cover forward to edge of dash section. 2 cracks on back of instrument cluster one on right side 4" long, and one on the left side about 6" long. Vehicle has not been in any accidents. This seems to be a common problem that gm is ignoring. This structure problem happened on Tuesday, January 28, 2014.
See
all problems of GMC Sierra and
all Structure problems of GMC Sierra.
Structure problem of GMC Acadia
The vehicle involved is a 2009 GMC Acadia. Vehicle identification number (VIN): 1GKER23D39_. Various gm vehicles have a known defect that allows water from the sun roof drain to enter the passenger compartment and more importantly allows water to enter the passenger compartment fuse block. This defect is covered under service bulletin #08-08-57-003c. This vehicle has had numerous electrical system issues that only occur during heavy rains and the dealer has been unable to recreate the problem after things have dried out so to speak. Most recently after a heavy rain, the battery was dead and when replaced with a new battery, the engine would not shut off even after the key was removed. This is a serious safety concern that can result in injury or death. The only way to shut off the engine is to remove the ecm fuse from the under hood fuse block. Not being able to shut the engine off via the key can have serious life consequences in the event of an emergency. This is a wide spread issue that seems to get worse over time and ends up with not being able to shut the engine off. The gm models affected by the service bulletin as follows: 2008-2012 Buick enclave 2007-2012 GMC Acadia 2007-2010 Saturn outlook. It was January 12, 2014 when this structure issue happened.
See
all problems of GMC Acadia and
all Structure problems of GMC Acadia.
Structure problem of Acura TL
The VIN of this Tl is 19UUA66224_. Dash board driver to passenger side many large long cracks. Acura Tl owners get no response from Acura motor company on this defect. This problem occurred on 06/25/09.
See
all problems of Acura TL and
all Structure problems of Acura TL.
Structure problem of Acura TL
The car is a 2006 Acura Tl. The vehicle identification number (VIN) of the car was 19UUA66276_. About 3-6 months ago, I noticed a crack on the passenger side of my Acura 2006 Tl. Gradually the crack grew, then over time, I saw two more cracks in the areas where the airbags are located. Now these cracks are widening and I can see white in the cracks. My concern is that the manufacturer's defect will compromise proper deployment of the airbags in case of an accident. If so, this can have tragic consequences. I called the Acura manufacturer customer service. They informed me that it will cost me $1500-2000 and that the adjustment from them will be minimal because the warranty for such a thing has expired. I researched on the internet and discovered that this is a common problem for Acuras. Please, please investigate and help others like me who are highly disappointed, discouraged and angry about the poor quality of materials used in the area that encases the airbags that should protect us from injury or death. For your information: my car has 92,000 miles and I have always taken good precautions to protect the dashboard with a windshield cover, used special conditioner and cracked my windows to keep the heat out. I also do proper and timely mechanical and electrical maintenance. I am the only driver and was hoping this would be my last car. Now, if I must sell my car, my car has depreciated substantially due to poor workmanship and I will have a car payment I don't need or can't afford. Do ru. It was July 1, 2007 when this structure issue occurred.
See
all problems of Acura TL and
all Structure problems of Acura TL.
Structure problem of Honda CR-V
The vehicle involved was a 2004 Honda Cr-v. 2004 Honda crv. Consumer writes in regards to vehicle paint issues. The consumer stated white spots starting appearing on the hood, then windows and around the windows. Also, the air conditioner had to be fixed. This structure issue occurred Mon., Mar. 3, 2014.
See
all problems of Honda CR-V and
all Structure problems of Honda CR-V.
Structure problem of Honda Accord
Consumer has a 2014 Honda Accord. The contact stated that while driving approximately 5 mph, the headlights from another vehicle vehicle caused a reflective glare to the e driver's side view mirror, obstructing the driver's visibility of the roadway. The vehicle was not repaired. The manufacturer was notified of the problem. The approximate failure mileage was 150. Updated 03/31/lj. This structure problem happened on Sunday, February 16, 2014.
See
all problems of Honda Accord and
all Structure problems of Honda Accord.
Structure problem of Hyundai Genesis
The vehicle involved is a 2011 Hyundai Genesis coupe. Letter from congressman sarbanes on behalf of constituent re vehicle safety. The consumer stated there was a metal-on-metal sound coming from the vehicle and the steering would bind while driving. The vehicle was taken to the dealer, where the noise and steering issues were confirmed. The dealer stated the problem was due to a seam failure on the chassis. The steering pump was replaced. However, a month later, the problem returned. It was Wed., Sep. 12, 2012 when this structure issue occurred.
See
all problems of Hyundai Genesis and
all Structure problems of Hyundai Genesis.
Structure problem of Hyundai Tucson
The car involved is a 2012 Hyundai Tucson. I was having my car cleaned after a week at the beach and the little plastic circle that hold the floor mats in place came off of the floor mat. Now when I drive the floor mat is constantly riding up onto the gas pedal. I called Hyundai and they said there was nothing they could do and I'd have to purchase a whole new set of floor mats for over $100. The car was just over a year old at the time. . . . Now I have had to take the floor mat out because I am afraid the gas pedal will get stuck or the floor mat will prevent me from using the brake properly. This structure issue occurred Tuesday, Jul. 23, 2013.
See
all problems of Hyundai Tucson and
all Structure problems of Hyundai Tucson.
Structure problem of Infiniti FX35
The VIN of this vehicle is JNRAS08W03_. 2003 Infiniti Fx35 trunk lock actuator motor and passenger door stop working dealer recommendation was to replace both actuators. This problem occurred on 01/31/2012.
See
all problems of Infiniti FX35 and
all Structure problems of Infiniti FX35.
Structure problem of Infiniti G37
The vehicle involved is a 2011 Infiniti G37. The vehicle's vehicle identification number (VIN) is JN1CV6FE9B_. This is a hardtop convertible car whose roof folds into the trunk space when the top is down. Unlike a previous hardtop convertible I owned (Volkswagen eos), the roof on the Infiniti goes down even when there is an obstruction in the trunk space (such as a book). [the roof of the eos would not go down until the obstruction was removed]. This has happened twice with the Infiniti, causing thousands of dollars of damage to my car. My concern is that if a child were to climb into the trunk (god forbid) and the top were to be engaged, there would be nothing to stop the roof from crushing the child. This seems like a serious safety shortcoming. I called Infiniti motors and expressed my concern; they created a file and basically said there was nothing they could do. It was Feb. 21, 2012 when this structure issue occurred.
See
all problems of Infiniti G37 and
all Structure problems of Infiniti G37.
Structure problem of Jeep Liberty
The vehicle identification number (VIN) is 1J4GL48K25_. The vehicle is a 2005 Jeep Liberty. The contact received a notice for NHTSA campaign number 13v252000 (fuel system, gasoline, structure) had surpassed the reasonable amount of time for repair. The manufacturer was not contacted. The contact had not experienced a failure. This problem occurred on 09/06/13.
See
all problems of Jeep Liberty and
all Structure problems of Jeep Liberty.
Structure problem of Jeep Liberty
The reporting person's vehicle is a 2002 Jeep Liberty. The contact stated that he received notification of NHTSA campaign number: 13v252000 (fuel system, gasoline , structure) but was unable to have the vehicle repaired because the part was not available. The contact stated that the manufacturer had surpassed a reasonable timeframe to initiate the recall repairs. The manufacturer was made aware of the contact's concerns. The contact had not experienced a failure. The VIN was not available. It was May. 8, 2014 when this structure issue happened.
See
all problems of Jeep Liberty and
all Structure problems of Jeep Liberty.
Structure problem of Kia Motor Sorento
The vehicle having this issue was a 2014 Kia Motor Sorento. 2014 kia sorrento. Consumer writes in regards to the driver seat, accelerator and brake pedal issues. The consumer stated the very large seats were a problem for her, as they were hard to adjust. The distance between the driver's seat and the accelerator pedal, in the most forward and highest seat position, was so great, she was only able to engage the pedals with her toes. The consumer stated she could barely see the hood and couldn't see or distance the front of the vehicle. Therefore, she was forced to use both a manufacturer's vehicle seat cushion and a thick chair cushion underneath that, to be able to raise her body up and closer to the dash. Also, there was and continues to be a subtle, chirping, rhythmic sound coming from the driver's side front tire or wheel well. The service technician stated he did not hear a noise. The traction light illuminated. The consumer discovered the tires had no traction, as they did not grip the road properly. She was informed the tires were inferior, so she was forced to purchase 4 new winter tires at a cost of $ 657. 18. Updated 04/21/14. This structure problem happened on Tuesday, Apr. 1, 2014.
See
all problems of Kia Motor Sorento and
all Structure problems of Kia Motor Sorento.
Structure problem of Kia Motor Sorento
The vehicle was a 2014 Kia Motor Sorento. The two rear, fixed windows leaked while the vehicle was in a touchless carwash. The dealership and service department have been notified and are having a glass expert inspect the trim and seal. The cause of the leaks is currently unknown. This issue happened on Saturday, October 26, 2013.
See
all problems of Kia Motor Sorento and
all Structure problems of Kia Motor Sorento.
Structure problem of Land Rover LR3
The vehicle involved is a 2006 Land Rover Lr3. Landrover lr 3 have a known problem of having water collect in the sunroof area due to blockage in some drainage tube from debris. Cleaning of these tubes is not a regular part of maintenance if you take your vehicle to the dealership for scheduled maintenance or service. The water collect and leaks into the cabin directly over the radio and middle console. It also leaks over the dashboard near the passenger heat register and in the driver's side dashboard area over the heat register. Water seeps into the electric system (the main bcm) that controls many important functions of the vehicle operation. So far I have a short in the radio. Many of the landrover forums online have several customers and owners of landrover Lr3 that have experienced this problem. This defect in the drainage system for the sunroof could cause serious damage / shorting out of the bcm that controls the entire vehicle. It was Jan. 3, 2014 when this structure issue happened.. Read more...
See
all problems of Land Rover LR3 and
all Structure problems of Land Rover LR3.
Structure problem of Land Rover LR3
The vehicle was a 2005 Land Rover Lr3. Vehicle identification number (VIN): SALAD24495_. Water coming into the driver and passenger carpet through the sunroof drains. The failure date was February 20, 2012.
See
all problems of Land Rover LR3 and
all Structure problems of Land Rover LR3.
Structure problem of Lexus ES
The car involved was a 2012 Lexus Es. On the passenger side dashboard next to temperature control switch, dashboard vinyl is melting, it has bubble and one bubble was broken to make a hole. I noticed it on April 1, 2014. When I changed the cabin air filter on March,31 in glove compartment, I didn't see it. I brought my car to new country Lexus and described the issue hoping that their technician may see issue with temperature control resistance may causing wiring to heat that is causing vinyl to melt. But they didn't see it that way, instead they are saying that I might have dropped a chemical on it, I swore to them I didn't use any chemical and I don't have any passenger except my wife. I don't want to fix the vinyl until I fix what caused it. But, unfortunately Lexus dealerships trained technician didn't see anything causing it from the inside the dashboard. By taking second opinion from outside repair shop, he mentioned the temperature control resistance may be heating up the wire that might have caused the vinyl to melt. I feel that this is a real issue and it may cause a fire. I have opened a case with Lexus corporate and a case manage promised to call me by April 4, 2014. Updated 04/17/14. It was 04/01/14 when this structure issue happened.
See
all problems of Lexus ES and
all Structure problems of Lexus ES.
Structure problem of Lexus Rx400h
The vehicle having this issue was a 2007 Lexus Rx400h. The vehicle identification number (VIN) of the car was JTJHW31U17_. Rubber handle part to open the hatch back, became gooey like tar, and made a big mess. Difficult to clean off of things and hands. Progressively worsened. Temporary repetitive solutions was to cut to fit black duct tape and totally cover the mess, but could still press the mechanism if necessary. Mostly use remote now or the button in the driver's seat. Last duct tape application is wearing off, and I need to go in to Lexus for a recall service, so I decided to ask them about it, and how much it would cost. Amazingly, the service man knew off the top of his head that they had the part in stock, and recalled how much the part and labor would cost! sounds like they've had a lot of these replacements!!! of course I'm not under warranty right now. The failure date was Sunday, Nov. 1, 2009.
See
all problems of Lexus Rx400h and
all Structure problems of Lexus Rx400h.
Structure problem of Lincoln Navigator
Our 05 Lincoln Navigator we just purchased about 7-8 months ago. The retractable running boards broke on the driver side rear in the swiveling bushing area. The structure cracked and would not hold it up. I got told there are no parts available for this and its $3,000. 00 for a new running board. I am super upset, especially because I purchased this vehicle for my wife's daycare, and while one of the children stepped up on it, it broke; therefore they fell on the ground twisting their ankle. I can't afford to spend $3k on a new running board. I think its insane that there is not replacement parts for this. I cant get the kids in and out on the driver side now. I am so upset. Why hasn't someone fixed this. Sounds like it happens to all of them in this year range. No one can afford to fix them. This structure problem happened on 01/28/14.
See
all problems of Lincoln Navigator and
all Structure problems of Lincoln Navigator.
Structure problem of Lincoln Navigator
Cpsc#i1230613a. 2010 Lincoln Navigator. Consumer stated her daughter stepped out the truck onto the extended running board and it closed and crushed her feet/ankles between the running board and car frame. Ford said they could not duplicate the accident so they told her to keep the car and bring it back if happens again. This problem occurred on Mar. 8, 2012.
See
all problems of Lincoln Navigator and
all Structure problems of Lincoln Navigator.
Structure problem of Mazda MAZDA6
The vehicle involved was a 2011 Mazda Mazda6. Sunglass holder above rear view mirror pops out while driving obstructing the drivers use of rear view mirror. This problem occurred on Monday, December 9, 2013.
See
all problems of Mazda MAZDA6 and
all Structure problems of Mazda MAZDA6.
Structure problem of Mazda MAZDA3
The car was a 2012 Mazda Mazda3. Crash happened when the problem occurred. Car hit coyote at 75mph. Car never wavered from what it was supposed to do. It saved our lives that night. Headlight not hit by coyote but bares a large "blind spot" on drivers side making car unsafe to drive after dark. Car taken to dealership, dealership says head light is within specs and was compared to another car of the same make and model year and the "blind spot" is normal. This particular Mazda 3 "doesn't like tires". That is what the guy who put on the 3rd full set of tires told me. Mileage 46,000 the car keeps breaking motor mounts and Mazda claims this is all from the accident now 15 months ago. They refuse to fix headlight and I have been told not to drive the car after dark as my insurance company may fight if I should have an accident due to the faulty head light. I have never know a car manufacturer to offer headlights with blind spots but I have an invoice from the dealership saying this is normal on the Mazda 3. These cars are not made to take the impact of a coyote so I can only imagine what would happen to the Mazda 3 should it hit something larger than a dog. This structure issue occurred June 29, 2012.
See
all problems of Mazda MAZDA3 and
all Structure problems of Mazda MAZDA3.
Structure problem of Mercedes Benz E350
The car involved is a 2014 Mercedes Benz E350. The vehicle identification number (VIN) of the car was WDDKJ5KB0E_. In October of 2013 I leased a 2014 mercedes E350. The vehicle had been parked overnight at my home on 12/25/13 and upon entering the vehicle on 12/26/13, I noticed a large crack extending approximately 15 inches from the bottom of the driver's side windshield wiper and up to the center portion of the windshield. When I parked the vehicle at my home on 12/25/13 this large 15 inch crack did not exist. I took the vehicle to the mercedes dealership on 12/27/13 and was told the huge crack in the windshield was caused by a small impact, about the diameter of a pencil point just below the windshield wiper. The extremely small pencil point diameter impact caused the windshield to develop the crack overnight while the vehicle was parked at my home, since the large crack didn't exist when I last exited my vehicle at my home on 12/25/13. I believe that if such a small pencil point sized impact as alleged by the dealer, could cause such a large crack to develop overnight while my vehicle was parked at my home, the windshield itself is defective and the weakness of the E350 windshield poses a serious safety hazard. This issue happened on Thursday, December 26, 2013.
See
all problems of Mercedes Benz E350 and
all Structure problems of Mercedes Benz E350.
Structure problem of Mercedes Benz E350
The car was a 2014 Mercedes Benz E350. My husband and I just purchased a 2014 mercedes e 350 convertible and the first time I placed a standard size water bottle in the cup holder it fell under the pedals on the first turn. The cup holder are not safe to use for any cups or bottles. This structure problem happened on Sep. 9, 2013.
See
all problems of Mercedes Benz E350 and
all Structure problems of Mercedes Benz E350.
Structure problem of Mercury Milan
The vehicle identification number (VIN) of this Mercury Milan is 3MEHM08Z18_. 2008 Mercury Milan. Consumer writes in regards to vehicle dashboard has warped in such a way that it prevents the air bag from properly deploying. This problem occurred on Mar. 3, 2014.
See
all problems of Mercury Milan and
all Structure problems of Mercury Milan.
Structure problem of Mercury Mountaineer
The vehicle was a 2008 Mercury Mountaineer. Driver seat moves back into exit position and interior lights come on while driving. This happens at any speed periodically and while going over bumps. I am very short so when this happens I have a difficult time reaching the gas/brake. I have 4 young children and this is a very big safety issue while driving. This issue happened on Wed., Dec. 1, 2010.
See
all problems of Mercury Mountaineer and
all Structure problems of Mercury Mountaineer.
Structure problem of Mitsubishi Endeavor
The car was a 2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor. The a/c drain tube leaks and causes water to pool up on the driver's side floorboard underneath the carpeting. I have had the vehicle looked at two times and all they can do is blow the tube out, which only temporarily fixes the problem. It is recommended to have the dash removed in order to get to the box where the debris is located to repair the seal. I don't have hundreds of dollars to have this done, nor can I do without my vehicle for several days! this should be made a recall because it becomes not only a safety hazard, but also a health hazard. The water makes the floorboard wet, causes the windows to fog up on the inside and causes the flooring under the carpeting to possibly become corroded. Plus, it causes mold to grow which makes my allergies flair up. So, Mitsubishi if you read this, please consider recalling all Endeavors to fix this problem!!. This structure problem happened on 09/11/13.
See
all problems of Mitsubishi Endeavor and
all Structure problems of Mitsubishi Endeavor.
Structure problem of Mitsubishi Endeavor
The vehicle having this issue was a 2007 Mitsubishi Endeavor. The vehicle's vehicle identification number (VIN) is 4AAMM21S37_. There is a leak that is causing the driver side carpet to become very wet. This I also resulting emittng an odor. The failure date was Saturday, Jan. 12, 2013.
See
all problems of Mitsubishi Endeavor and
all Structure problems of Mitsubishi Endeavor.
Structure problem of Nissan Maxima
2007 Nissan Maxima. Consumer writes in regards to corrosion in the floor boards, on both the driver's and passenger side. This structure issue occurred Tuesday, Apr. 1, 2014.
See
all problems of Nissan Maxima and
all Structure problems of Nissan Maxima.
Structure problem of Nissan Altima
Well I have a black 09 Nissan Altima and I started to notice that my dashboard is very sticky and shiny and it looks like its melting. There is such a big glare that blocks your view when you're driving. I look online and saw that other people in florida have the same problem I do. In florida the weather is always hot. The cars in florida should be made to withstand the hot weather and not start melting. This is such a safety hazard for drivers. This structure issue occurred 07/25/13.
See
all problems of Nissan Altima and
all Structure problems of Nissan Altima.
Structure problem of SAAB 95
The vehicle having this issue was a 2003 SAAB 9-5. The vehicle stalled on 4 separate occasions from various speeds of 25 mph or more while driving. The vehicle has been to the dealer on 3 separate occasions. The dealer has cleaned and tightened the battery cables, the first time, they replaced the crank sensor, t-7 and the ignition switch, the second time and the third time, they were unable to duplicate the problem. The ecm was replaced but the vehicle stalled again, the cup holder crack and had broken, the battery cables were loose and dirty, the transmission did not shift properly and caused a jerking motion, the electrical gauges dropped and the vehicle lost acceleration. It was October 15, 2003 when this structure issue occurred.
See
all problems of SAAB 95 and
all Structure problems of SAAB 95.
Structure problem of SAAB 95
The vehicle was a 2002 SAAB 9-5. VIN of the vehicle was YS3EH48G91_. Contact stated the inboard dashboard side information display panel garbled, and there was no legible display printing off. The dealer advised the contact this was a frequent problem, and he would have to replace it often. He had the system repaired previously ,and was experiencing the problem again. The manufacturer will offer no free remedy. This structure issue occurred Thursday, June 10, 2004.
See
all problems of SAAB 95 and
all Structure problems of SAAB 95.
Structure problem of Saturn ION
The VIN of the car is 1G8AW12FX4_. I own a 2004 Saturn Ion. The roof of the vehicle exhibited a severe leak from the date of purchase. Water would enter the vehicle rapidly during heavy rains. The vehicle was not further repaired. The failure mileage was 32,000 and the current mileage was 57,030. This structure problem happened on Friday, September 9, 2011.
See
all problems of Saturn ION and
all Structure problems of Saturn ION.
Structure problem of Saturn VUE
Vehicle identification number (VIN) of the vehicle is 3GSCL33P69_. No accident. I'm reporting designflaw: Saturn Vue service manual states not use tire chains, but no suggestion of what to use in snow. After many phone calls I found Saturn sells spike spiders for $470 to more than $500 a pop. These spikes are said by the spike spider manufacturer, not to interfere with sensors, brakes, suspension on the side of the tire next to the vehicle. My Saturn dealership was careful not to recommend these very expensive spikes. I had to ask them. But Saturn does sell them at their dealerships. When calling the nationwide Saturn customer service number, they didn't have an answer at all for me. In fact, they wanted to talk about everything but my question. So, it is either pay for very expensive after market product or use nothing. I fear the latter. How many folks will go without this winter due to cost and availability. All due to the design of the vehicle. Someone wasn't thinking. It was Oct. 17, 2009 when this structure issue occurred.
See
all problems of Saturn VUE and
all Structure problems of Saturn VUE.
Structure problem of Subaru Outback
The vehicle identification number (VIN) of this Subaru Outback is 4S4BRCCC3D_. 2013 Subaru Outback. Consumer writes in regards to poor quality made tie downs in cargo area of vehicle. The consumer stated when he took the vehicle for its 7500 mile service, he showed the service representative the broken tie down. The consumer stated it broke, when he tied his 50lb dog to it. The service representative stated they would not replace it, because it was not designed to handle the tremendous stress of a 50lb dog. After some discussion, the consumer should the representative where he could easily break the tie down with his hand. The consumer was informed the tie downs were only designed to hold a net put over groceries to keep them from sliding, certainly not for anything of substantial weight or stress. The failure date was Friday, January 4, 2013.
See
all problems of Subaru Outback and
all Structure problems of Subaru Outback.
Structure problem of Subaru Legacy
The brake and gas pedals on automatic transmission Subaru Legacy models are so close together that a man of average shoe size, wearing boots of any kind, is liable to inadvertently apply pressure to both pedals at the same time. The "fix" is simple: Subaru of America should hang the manual transmission brake pedal, with its smaller pad footprint, on all automatic transmission Legacy models. Problem solved. While driving my vehicle, and if wearing boots, I must maintain constant vigilance to avoid the potentially lethal consequence of applying pressure to both pedals at the same time. This structure issue occurred 11/28/2012.
See
all problems of Subaru Legacy and
all Structure problems of Subaru Legacy.
Structure problem of Suzuki SX4
The car involved is a 2007 Suzuki Sx4. The vehicle identification number (VIN) is JS2YB41707_. Ok where do I begin, I have had this car for 5 yrs. , and it is a piece of crap. The air conditioner leaks water inside the car, I had it blown out and it didn't help, the power steering pump leaks, I don't have any power steering, the air bag light stays on. I paid 15,000 for this car, I feel its a lemon, but can't prove it, cause I don't have receipts from the last 12months. Does anybody else have these problems. I'm just sick of it, I know I got ripped off. What can I do about it, I will never buy another Suzuki. This issue happened on Tuesday, Oct. 2, 2012.
See
all problems of Suzuki SX4 and
all Structure problems of Suzuki SX4.
Structure problem of Suzuki Esteem
The VIN of this Esteem is JS2GB41S3Y_. 2000 Suzuki Esteem. Consumer writes in regards to vehicle front end problems and seeks reimbursement for unauthorized repairs. The consumer stated he took the vehicle to a repair shop for front end problems. While there, he was informed a recall had been issued for a frame problem. The consumer then contacted the dealer, and they confirmed, that in fact, the vehicle was covered. The vehicle was then towed to the dealer. The next day, the consumer received a call from the dealer, stating a mistake had been made, and the vehicle was no longer covered under the recall. According to the dealer, the vehicle was not covered because it was five months older than the recalled covered. The dealer informed the consumer the cost for the repair was $603. 26 after deducting $300 from the original bill. The consumer stated he never authorized them to perform the work, since the recall was no longer valid. This structure issue occurred Nov. 2, 2012.
See
all problems of Suzuki Esteem and
all Structure problems of Suzuki Esteem.
Structure problem of Toyota Tacoma
The vehicle's vehicle identification number (VIN) was 5TEWM72N01_. The vehicle involved is a 2001 Toyota Tacoma. The contact stated that the subframe was perforated due to rust. The vehicle was taken to a dealer where it was diagnosed that the entire frame needed to be replaced. The manufacturer was notified of the failure. The vehicle was not repaired. The approximate failure and current mileage was 154,000. This problem occurred on Wednesday, April 23, 2014.
See
all problems of Toyota Tacoma and
all Structure problems of Toyota Tacoma.
Structure problem of Toyota Prius
The vehicle involved was a 2006 Toyota Prius. When driving at night, the dashboard displays some of the dashboard on the front windshield, which causes you to avoid that area of your windshield. This is a defect in all 2006-2009 Toyota Prius cars. What happens is that you start looking at this reflection and it creates a safety concern. You also do not have a clear view through the reflection. It is extremely distracting. When you are on a country rode late at night, where there may not be any street lights, it is even worse. This problem was fixed in the 2010 models and beyond with a longer edge on the dashboard at the top. I have talked to Toyota about this, but have gotten nowhere. I feel this is a big safety concern that must be addressed and I am turning to you for help. I could have gotten lawyers involved in a class action lawsuit, but I wanted to try and resolve this professionally. I am not looking to get rich or make money off this problem. I just want my car and everyone else's Prius fixed. This issue has always been around. I have noticed it more lately with cloud cover and driving on back country roads at night. It is scary. It was Mar. 10, 2014 when this structure issue happened.
See
all problems of Toyota Prius and
all Structure problems of Toyota Prius.
Structure problem of Volkswagen Tiguan
The car was a 2010 Volkswagen Tiguan. The VIN of the problem Tiguan is WVGAV7AX4A_. My 2010 Tiguan has experienced a couple of significant issues due to design - one a burned fuse box and two a major water leak inside the right front passenger floorboard. Both issues stem from design and not wear and tear. Both repairs were costly - $561 and $753. I have received a safety recall 97z9 from vw for a fuse issue and will be waiting on a response. I've also submitted an inquiry to vw asking about plans to review the drain hose issue. Had I not investigated the strong damp smell in the interior of the vehicle I would not have found the saturated floorboard and I do mean soaking wet. Both drain hoses were found to have small leaks and the route of the hoses dumps right into the cabin - again this is not a wear and tear issue - it's a design/product issue. As a precaution the dealer recommended that I have all of the hoses replaced to prevent future water damage. I've seen numerous complaints from other vw owners about the drain hoses being defective so this appears to be a larger issue than just a few vehicles. Thank you. This structure problem happened on Sep. 13, 2013.
See
all problems of Volkswagen Tiguan and
all Structure problems of Volkswagen Tiguan.
Structure problem of Volkswagen Passat
The car is a 2004 Volkswagen Passat. The vehicle identification number (VIN) of the car was WVWMD63B04_. The plastic clips holding the window in place broke and window falls down. It costs $350 to replace the $1. 50 cheap plastic part. This problem occurred on January 2, 2012.
See
all problems of Volkswagen Passat and
all Structure problems of Volkswagen Passat.
Structure problem of Volvo V70
The vehicle involved was a 2009 Volvo V70. The VIN of this vehicle is YV1BW98209_. I have a windshield problem: the seal that secures the windshield to the roof of the car has failed along the entire length of the top of the windshield. This was found during troubleshooting a leak problem -- water was entering the car when it rained, leaking from the rear-view mirror and the light above it (note - my V70 wagon does * have a sunroof). Upon inspection by an auto glass technician, the windshield easily lifted away from the car when it was pushed from inside the cabin. The technician told me that this is a major safety problem. Without a proper seal on the windshield, the entire structural design safety of the car is compromised. If the car was in an accident, especially a front-end collision, the windshield would not absorb any of the impact as it was designed to, resulting in greater damage to the vehicle and making it unsafe. I was advised not to operate the vehicle until it was repaired. I looked at some online Volvo forums and noted that other Volvo owners have had this problem. The technician also stated that he has noticed this problem on other Volvo vehicles, and was replacing about 2 or 3 a month. He believes it is a manufacturing defect and that Volvo should issue a recall to correct this problem. The failure date was December 24, 2013.
See
all problems of Volvo V70 and
all Structure problems of Volvo V70.
Structure problem of Volvo XC90
The car involved is a 2003 Volvo Xc90. I was not aware of the design defect in sun roof & the water damages that result in electrical issues. I had always parked my vehicle in covered parking until moving this year in January. I had taken my car in to have a tune up in Nov 2012 at which time I was given an estimate of repairs needed in my car. My car remained parked for most of 2013 due to having moved I wasn't able to afford repairs. The repairs where inner&outer tie rods,ball joints, mounts, arm bushings, rotors & break pads. The above aforementioned where made. Following repairs I washed my car and drove out of town 4th July weekend from los angeles to jamestown California. Once I arrived my car remained parked until returning home July 7th. Shortly after starting my car the dash gauges started to flash on/off and eventually went out. At the time I had my portable gps, a/c was working & I had use of windows (rolling up & down). I knew I had a full tank of gas cause I had fueled up prior to arriving at destination. Being I was in the middle of know where without cell phone service I drove as far as I could before I thought I may need gas. When I stopped to get fuel I was not able to open the door to refuel with gas. I broke the clips on the door allowing me to access and fuel tank and refill with gas. It was Sunday after a major holiday and there was a lot of traffic, the only Volvo dealership I passed was closed and I just wanted to get home. So I continued to drive and was just getting onto the grapevine and traffic really backed up. There was a fire that had been burning on the mountain to the right and helicopters where dumping water on this ongoing fire. Around this time I noticed the a/c had quit working and was blowing hot air. I tried to roll my windows down and they where inoperable. Traffic was at a crawl and there was no place to pull over. Worst nightmare ever. This structure issue occurred Sunday, July 7, 2013.
See
all problems of Volvo XC90 and
all Structure problems of Volvo XC90.
Structure problem of Audi A6
The VIN of the car is WAUDL74F25_. My 2005 Audi A6 has water damage. Some how over night heavy rain seepage left an inch of water behind driver seat. Car was parked in driveway at a slight incline. All windows and doors where closed. This has caused $2,700 electrical damage to modules located under front passenger seat. These modules alert me about esp/abs and park brake as well as a module that powers the vehicles mmi/navigation and stereo system. None of these function anylonger. I don't know where the water entered my vehicle. Is Audi responsible? this appears to be a design flaw. This structure issue occurred Saturday, May 5, 2012.
See
all problems of Audi A6 and
all Structure problems of Audi A6.
Structure problem of Audi Cabriolet
The car involved was a 2003 Audi Cabriolet. Vehicle identification number (VIN) of the vehicle is WAUAC48H53_. I purchased an Audi because I thought I was buying quality. I have a broken hing on my glove box that rarely is used (est $450), oil leak from a cam shaft chain adjuster seal (est $517), broken trunk bin (est $675), and now a radio that doesn't work and Audi wants ($1,900) so I can get radio reception. I am shocked these items have already worn out on a car that has only 50,500 miles and is only used for pleasure. This problem occurred on Jan. 2, 2012.
See
all problems of Audi Cabriolet and
all Structure problems of Audi Cabriolet.
Structure problem of BMW 3 Series
The vehicle having this issue was a 2008 BMW 3 Series. The auc sensor under the hood is not well secured. The bracket securing the sensor is broken leaving the sensor loose under the hood. The loose sensor wire rubs against sharp edge of the car body, breaking the outer protective shield of the wire. The exposed wire is a fire hazard. This structure issue occurred Monday, Aug. 29, 2011.
See
all problems of BMW 3 Series and
all Structure problems of BMW 3 Series.
Structure problem of BMW 328
The vehicle was a 2010 BMW 328i. (incident #1) I began having issues with my 2010 328i replacement vehicle (initially purchased 2009, because of water leakage BMW replaced 2009 with current 2010) hardtop, initially reporting slippage outside of the hardtop of rubber trim hanging out of the convertible top (seals) at approx 17k miles early may 2012. According to the invoice, the technician stated that the " hardtop roof seals were defective. Seals were removed and replaced at approx 18k miles after a two week wait to receive replacement parts ordered from the only supplier in germany". (incident #2) a year later, may 2013, once again I began to experience defective parts after hearing the hinge on the right (passenger) rear of my vehicle making a grinding noise, grating against the glass as the convertible collapsed into the trunk compartment of my vehicle. This was a noise that sounded as if the roof of the vehicle, upon closing was truncating and collapsing within itself. Fearing that the roof would collapse on me, I exited the vehicle and closed it until receiving service. Extremely frustrated that I had accepted another faulty BMW, and uncertain how to rationalize why the defacto expectation would be that the "convertible" feature would be the "safest feature on the vehicle, and knowing that the "convertible" option was the main reason for purchasing the vehicle may soon be my most expensive? reason for wishing I would have chosen another manufacturer other than BMW based on my 2009 experience. I have been continuously haunted, anxious, worried, unable to sleep because of the recent breakdowns with regard to the "safety/integrity" of the rooftop of my 2010 replacement vehicle. In the interest of safeguarding the public, shouldn't all convertibles have the option of a "special warranty" to the consumer to ensure the integrity of the vehicle?. This issue happened on May. 1, 2012.
See
all problems of BMW 328 and
all Structure problems of BMW 328.
Structure problem of Buick Regal
The vehicle was a 2013 Buick Regal. The vehicle identification number (VIN) is 2G4GV5GV6D_. The trim panel near the driver's left foot is not tightly secured and there is a space between trim panel and carpet. Driver's shoe sole gets caught under edge of panel and driver is unable to lift foot I order to apply clutch and therefore unable to control vehicle. Three very close calls accidents to date. The failure date was Monday, November 4, 2013.
See
all problems of Buick Regal and
all Structure problems of Buick Regal.
Structure problem of Buick Lacrosse
The vehicle involved is a 2012 Buick Lacrosse. There was crash involved with this problem. The vehicle identification number (VIN) of this Buick Lacrosse is 1G4GC5ER1C_. The a-pillar of the vehicle is extremely wide and obstructs visibility. The vehicle is dangerous to drive, and the width of the pillar has caused us to pop 3-tires (one left, two right) (three separate times/three different drivers) due to an inability to adequately gauge turns as a result of the pillar's width. It is an extreme design flaw and action should be taken against gm for such a negligent design. No matter the seat position, you simply do not have adequate frontward visibility to the left or right (it's just one giant frontward blind spot). Additionally, the c/d pillars are also extremely wide and obstructive, and the rear deck is too high. This design has not changed for even the 2014 models and provides an inherent safety risk. This structure problem happened on Aug. 20, 2012.
See
all problems of Buick Lacrosse and
all Structure problems of Buick Lacrosse.
Structure problem of Cadillac SRX
2012 Cadillac Srx. Consumer writes in regards to ignition switch malfunction. The consumer stated there was no fail safe, chime or timed shutoff once he left the vehicle. On several occasions, the consumer returned to his vehicle to find the vehicle running and the garage full of fumes. The steering wheel and windshield blocked the view of the engine start/stop button. Which has resulted in the consumer leaving the engine running on numerous occasions. The consumer stated the start button should be moved to the left or right or up or down , in order to be visible from the driver's seat. This problem occurred on Monday, March 3, 2014.
See
all problems of Cadillac SRX and
all Structure problems of Cadillac SRX.
Structure problem of Cadillac CTS
The vehicle involved was a 2006 Cadillac Cts. The rear driver's side panel that held the air bag came apart. I have not taken the vehicle to the dealer yet. If this panel is not in correctly and the air bag deploys, the panel may not separate correctly and cause injury to any passenger. This structure issue occurred 08/15/2013.
See
all problems of Cadillac CTS and
all Structure problems of Cadillac CTS.
Structure problem of Jaguar XK8
The vehicle was a 2002 Jaguar Xk8. The vehicle identification number (VIN) of this Jaguar Xk8 is SAJEA51C42_. Problems with wind noise on driver's side window. The front door was hard to open, the j gate clicked all the time when braking, air leaked in the driver's front window along with noise, there was a hum noise when going at highway speeds, and the center console light flashed. This problem occurred on Tuesday, Jan. 1, 1901.
See
all problems of Jaguar XK8 and
all Structure problems of Jaguar XK8.
Structure problem of Jaguar XK8
The vehicle involved was a 2001 Jaguar Xk8. The vehicle identification number (VIN) of the car was SAJDA42C91_. Hydraulic fluid leak in power roof system. This structure issue occurred 10/01/07.
See
all problems of Jaguar XK8 and
all Structure problems of Jaguar XK8.
Other Structure related problems of all cars: